COMMENTARY

 

                          ON

 

                  THE PSALMS

 

 

 

 

                                                   BY

                     E. W. HENGSTENBERG,

                         DR AND PROFESSOR OF THEOLOGY IN BERLIN.

 

 

 

 

                                               VOL. III.

 

 

                                             TRANSLATED BY THE

                            REV. JOHN THOMSON, LEITH,

 

                                                             AND

 

                       REV. PATRICK FAIRBAIRN, SALTON.

 

 

                                            EDINBURGH:

                         T. &L T. CLARK, 38 GEORGE STREET.

 LONDON : HAMILTON, ADAMS, AND CO.; SIMPKIN, MARSHALL, AND CO.

            SEELEY AND CO.; WARD AND CO.; JACKSON AND WALFORD, &C,

                                          DUBLIN : JOHN ROBERTSON.

                                                      MDCCCXLVIII,

                                                     1848

 

   Digitized by Ted Hildebrandt, Gordon College, Wenham, MA, March 2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

               ADVERTISEMENT.

 

 

 

 

            THE present Volume of the FOREIGN THEOLOGICAL LIBRARY

has been enlarged considerably beyond the regular size, in order

to comprize the whole of the remainder of HENGSTENBERG on

the PSALMS. Of the portion contained in this volume, it may be

proper to state that the translation, as far as the close of Psalm

cxxvi., is by Mr Thomson, the remainder by Mr Fairbairn. The

Treatises at the close have a separate paging, from its having

been found convenient to print that part of the translation before

the rest could be got ready for the press. By some accident the

short general introduction to the group of Psalms, cxxxv.—cxlvi.,

was omitted at its proper place between Ps. cxxxiv. and cxxxv.;

and it has been inserted at the close of the group, at p. 546.

The translators have not thought it necessary to append any

notes or explanations of their own, with the exception of a brief

statement at the close of the Treatises, for which the translator

of that portion is alone responsible.

 


 

 

 

 

 

                                         ERRATA.

 

   In Ps. cxx., p. 412; Ps. cxxi., p. 418; Ps. cxxii., p. 426; Ps, cxxiii, p. 432, for

Pilgrims read Pilgrimages.

 


 

 

 

 

 

                                               THE

 

                   BOOK OF PSALMS.

 

 

 

 

                                     PSALM LXXIX.

 

THE main division of the Psalm contains twelve verses. These

are divided, as is frequently the case, into three strophes, each

consisting of four verses. Ver. 1-4 contains the representation

of the misery:—the land of the Lord has been taken possession

of by the heathen, the temple desecrated, Jerusalem laid in ruins,

the servants of God have been put to death; the people of God

become the objects of contempt to their neighbours. The second

and third strophes contain the prayer. The conclusion, ver. 13,

containing the result of the whole, gives expression to confi-

dence.

            The Psalm stands nearly related to the lxxiv.; the situation

is the same, and they come a good deal in contact as regards the

expression. Both Psalms refer to the Chaldean invasion. The

Psalm before us proceeds on the supposition that the seventy-

fourth had been previously composed, and supplements it. In

the seventy-fourth Psalm the destruction of the sanctuary is

pre-eminently and almost exclusively brought forward; but in the

seventy-ninth it is referred to very briefly, for the purpose of

indicating the passages which connect the two Psalms, and

other subjects are put in the foreground. There is no good

reason for the assertion which has been made, that the Psalm

before us must have been composed previously to the seventy-

fourth, as the Temple is there spoken of as entirely destroyed,

 


2                  THE BOOK OF PSALMS.

 

whereas it is only its desecration that is spoken of here. The

desecration does not exclude its destruction; the destruction is

one of the forms of its desecration. Had the Psalmist design-

ed, in allusion to the seventy-fourth, to speak of the sanctuary

in one single expression, he could not possibly have found a

stronger term than this: the most dreadful thing that can befal

the sanctuary is that it be desecrated.  In saying this every

thing that can be affirmed of it is said.

            Several expositors, both ancient and modern, refer the Psalm

to the time of the Maccabees. But there are quite decisive

grounds against this view. First, from the close resemblance to

Ps. lxxiv., the arguments which were there adverted to are of

equal force here. There are no traces here of any reference to

the special relations of the times of the Maccabees. And there

are two circumstances which are not suitable to those times: the

laying of Jerusalem in ruins, ver. 1, and the mention of nations

and kingdoms in ver. 6 (comp. 2 Kings ixiv. 2), whereas in the

time of the Maccabees Judah had to do only with a single king-

dom.a There are also two weighty external reasons. Jeremiah

was acquainted with the Psalm, and made use of it (comp. at

ver. 6), and in 1 Macc. vii. 16 and 17 it is quoted as forming at

that time a portion of the sacred volume.b It is thus not neces-

sary here to avail ourselves of the general reasons which may be

urged against the existence of Maccabean Psalms.c

            The title, "a Psalm of Asaph," is confirmed by the fact that

the Psalm stands closely related to a whole class of Psalms which

bear in their titles the name of Asaph. Those critics who re-

 

            a The remark of Venema renders it evident that even verses 2 and 3 will not suit the

times of the Maccabees: "that the expressions, they delivered the servants of God to

birds and wild beasts, and there was none to bury them, are to be taken in a restricted

sense, as used only of some, and in reference to the attempts and intentions of the

enemies."

            b  kata> to>n lo<gon o{n e@graye: sa<rkaj o[si<wn k.t.l.  The Syrian translation: " ac-

cording to the word which the prophet has written." This is the usual way of quoting

Scripture: comp. Harless on Eph. iv. 8. Hitzig translates falsely: according to the

words which a certain one wrote. The obscure productions of unknown authors are

never quoted in this way. The fact that the author omits, in the passage from the

Psalm, what does not suit his purpose, renders it evident that the Psalm was not com-

posed for the occasion there referred to: comp. J. D. Michaelis.

            c Amyrald.: besides it cannot be doubted that there were prophets at the time of Ne-

buchad who were able to compose such poems; whereas in the age of Antiochus there

were none, at least none whose writings have reached posterity.

 


                      PSALM LXXIX. VER. 1-8.                            3

 

ject the titles are unable to explain this similarity admitted by

themselves, which obtains among all the Asaphic Psalms, even

among those which were composed at different eras. If we fol-

low the title the reason of this is clear as day. The descendants

of Asaph looked upon themselves as the instruments by which

the Asaph of David's time, their illustrious ancestor, continued

to speak, and therefore they very naturally followed as closely in

his footsteps as possible: the later descendants, moreover, would

always have the compositions of their more early, ancestors before

their minds. The unity of the persons named in the titles is

connected with the unity of character by which all these Psalms

are pervaded. Any one who composed at his own hand, and did

not look at his ancestor or the early or contemporaneous instru-

ments of that ancestor, could not have adopted it.

            Ver. 1-4.—Ver. 1. 0 God, the heathen have come into

thine inheritance, they have polluted thy holy temple; they

have laid Jerusalem in ruins. Ver. 2. They have given

the bodies of thy servants for food to the fowls of heaven,

the flesh of thy saints to the wild beasts of the earth. Ver.

3. They have shed their blood like water round about Jerusa-

lean, and the was no one to bury. Ver. 4. We have become

a reproach to our neighbours, a scorn and derision to them that

are round about us.—On ver. 1, Calvin: The Psalmist says,

the order of nature is, as it were, inverted; the heathen have

come into the inheritance of God." Berleb.:  "Faith utters a

similar complaint in its struggles: the heathen have made an

inroad into my heart as thy inheritance." The pollution of the

temple by the heathen presupposes its previous pollution by the

Israelites: comp. Ex. v. 11, xxiii. 38. Ps. lxxiv. 7, is parallel.

On vtyH in ver. 2, comp. at Ps. 1. 10. That the Crx is to be

understood of the earth and not of the land is obvious from the

term in contrast heaven.—The expression, "and there was none

to bury," points to a great and general desolation, such as did

not exist at any other period except during the Chaldean inva-

sion.—Ver. 4 is from Ps. xliv. 13.

            Ver. 5-8.—Ver. 5. How long, 0 Lord, wilt thou be angry

for ever? shall thy jealousy burn like fire!  Ver. 6. Pour out

thy floods of wrath upon the heathen who know thee not, and up-

on the kingdoms which do not call upon thy name. Ver. 7.

 


4                   THE BOOK OF PSALMS.

 

For he devours Jacob, and they lay waste his pasture. Ver. 8.

Remember not against us the iniquities of our ancestors, make

haste to surprise us with thy tender mercies, for we have become

very much reduced.—On "how long . . . for ever," in ver. 5,

comp. at Ps. lxxiv. 9; xiii. 1. On the second clause, Deut.

xxix. 19. Ex. xx. 5.a –In ver. 6, the heathen and the kingdoms

are not at all the heathen nations generally, but those who had

risen up against Israel. The prayer rests upon what God does

constantly. Judgment begins at the house of God, but it pro-

ceeds thence to those whom God has employed as the instruments

of his punishment: the storm of the wrath of God always re-  

mains to fall at last upon the world at, enmity with his church;

comp. Deut. xxxii. Ez. xxxviii. 39.b—The sing. lkx in ver. 7

denotes the one soul which animates the many membered body of

the enemies of the church of God. All the nations and king-

doms referred to in ver. 6 served the king of Babylon. It is

better to take hvn in the sense of pasture than of habitation:

comp. the tyfrm in ver. 13: they eat up Israel, the poor flock,

and lay waste his pasture, his land. Ver. 6 and 7 are repeated

almost word for word in Jer. x. 25. It has been alleged in

favour of Jeremiah being the original author, that the prophecy

was uttered before the destruction. But this reason is of no

weight. The prophecy, which designedly bears no particular

date, was, at least in its present form, written after the destruc-

tion; it contains much moreover which represents the destruc-

tion as an event which had already taken place, while other por-

tions of it again refer to it as still future, (a peculiarity which

admits of explanation from the circumstance that the prophet is

here giving a summary view and the substance of what had been

spoken at different times); ver. 25 itself takes for granted that

the heathen had already devoured Israel and laid waste his pas-

turage. On the other hand, and in favour of the priority of the

Psalm before us, it may be urged that in all such cases there is

 

            a Ven.: The interrogative form conveys an insinuation that God ought not to de-

stroy utterly the whole people, as there remain among them so many pious, to be chas-

tised and purified (Dan. xi. 35), but not to be destroyed.

            b Arnd: "The difference is this: God's wrath will burn for ever against unbelievers;

with believers, however, when they deserve punishment his wrath burns fiercely indeed,

but not eternally,—he visits them with the rod and chastisement for a short while, and

with a view to their improvement."

 


                          PSALM LXXIX. VER. 5-8.                      5

 

a presumption in favour of Jeremiah borrowing--it being his

usual manner to do so; that in this chapter there are manifestly

references to other Psalms, the preceding verse being borrowed

from Ps. vi. 1, (comp. Kuper p. 159); that in Jeremiah the

words occur without any connection whatever, while in the Psalm

before us the prayer that the Lord would pour out the flood of

his wrath upon the heathen, is appended without anything inter-

vening to the complaint that his zeal is burning like fire against

Israel—the "pour out" refers back to "they have poured out,"

in ver. 3, (Mich. propter, sanguinem tuorum copiose effusum ef-

funde, see Ps. lxix. 24),—comp. ver. 10; that the difficult singu-

lar lkx is changed into the plural; and finally, that the passage

is expanded exactly in the style of Jeremiah in quoting passages,

who can leave nothing short and round,--and they have eaten him

and consumed him.—Mynwxr in ver. 8, where it stands alone, sig-

nifies nothing else than ancestors, not antiquity. The reference to

Lev. xxvi. 45, which it is impossible not to observe, is altogether

against the exposition, the former sins:  "and I remember to

them the covenant of their ancestors whom I brought out of the

land of Egypt before the eyes of the heathen, that I might be

their God,"—God does not remember the sins of their ancestors,

but according to his own promise, the covenant which he made

with them. Comp. also Lev. xxvi. 39, where instead of "ances-

tors" we have "fathers:" they desired that they may not be

treated according to this verse, but according to the 45th of this

chapter, or rather, that after they had experienced the treatment

referred to in the 39th verse, they might now also enjoy the 45th,

comp. Lam. v. 7. The guilty fathers do not at all stand in op-

position to the innocent children. It is the uniform doctrine of

scripture that no one is punished unless he be personally guilty,

and that it is only in the ungodly children that the sin of the

fathers which is represented as increased in them that is punish-

ed: comp. the Beitr. p. 544 ss. The mention of the sins of

the fathers, so far from exculpating, indicates the depth and the

magnitude of the guilt. Calvin:  "They acknowledge an obstin-

ancy of long standing, in which they have hardened themselves

against God. And this acknowledgment corresponds to the

prophetic punishments. For sacred history testifies that the

punishment of the captivity was postponed till God had experi-

 


6                      THE BOOK OF PSALMS.

 

enced that their wickedness was incurable:" comp. Is. lxv. 7.

On Mdq to surprise, comp. at Ps. xxi. 4.

            Ver. 9-12.—Ver. 9. Help us, 0 God, our Salvation, for thy

name's glory's sake; and deliver us and pardon our sins for

thy name's sake. Ver. 10. Why should the heathen say, Where

is their God? May the vengeance of the blood of thy servants

which they have shed become known to the heathen before our

eyes. Ver. 11. May the sighing of those who are bound come

before thee. According to the greatness of thine arm preserve

the dying. Ver 12. And recompense to our neighbours seven-

fold into their bosom their reproach wherewith they have re-

proached thee, 0 Lord.—In the 9th verse the church implores

the Lord to redeem that pledge of similar future deeds, which she

got in his early dealings. The name, and the honour of the name,

i. e., his glory (comp. at Ps. xxix. 1, 2), are in reality the

same:—for the sake of thy historically manifested glory (comp.

at Ps. xxiii. 3), for the purpose of now verifying this in sight of

the blaspheming enemies, and to their terror.—The first half of

the 10th verse is word for word from Jo. ii. 17, and this passage

again rests on Ex. xxxii. 12. Num. xiv. 13 ss. Deut. ix. 28. On

comparing these passages, especially the one last quoted, it be-

comes obvious, that "Where is their God?" signifies, "Where is

his far-famed love towards his people and where is his omnipo-

tence?"  The ground is not one of a mere external character:--

the heathen would have had good reason to speak thus, and

therefore God must not give them any occasion to do so; he must

make known his omnipotence, and his love, in delivering his

people; they cannot be for ever given over to misery: comp. the

Christology p. 657, &c.  In the second clause, the Myg is

written without the Vau: comp. at Ps. lxxiv. 11. "Before our

eyes," is from Deut. vi. 22. "The vengeance of the blood of thy

servants" points back to "He will avenge the blood of his ser-

vants," in the conclusion of the Song of Moses, in Deut. xxxii.

43.—In ver. 11, the whole people appears under the emblem of a

prisoner. At the first clause we ought to add: as it once did in

Egypt, Ex. ii. 23-25. The people of God have the privilege, in

every trouble, of looking to the early deliverances as pledges of

those yet to come; and hence they possess a sure ground of con-

fidence. The world, when it prays, prays only as an experiment,

 


                                  PSALM LXXX.                                  7

 

having no connection whatever with history. On "according to

the greatness of thine arm," comp. Num. xiv. 19. Deut. iii. 24.

Inward greatness is meant, energy. The htvmt is a noun

formed from the third fem. fut. (comp. in Balaam p. 120, &c.),

very probably by the Psalmist himself. Hence it cannot mean

"death," but only "that which dies," "the dying."  The sons

of the dying are those who belong to him as a personified race,

and thus the dying themselves, just like "the sons of the needy''

in Ps. lxxii. 4.—On "in their lap," ver. 12, comp. Is. lxv. 6-7.

Jer. xxxii. 18. Luke vi. 38. Their reproach, inasmuch as they

say, Where is their God? ver. 10.

            Ver. 13. And we are thy people and sheep of thy pasture,

therefore we shall praise thee for ever, recount thy praise through

all generations. The verse is expressive of confidence:  "we shall

praise thee" being equivalent to "thou shalt give us occasion to

do so;" comp. Ps. xliv. 8. In reference to "the sheep of thy

pasture," comp. at Ps. lxxiv. 1.

 

 

                                  PSALM LXXX.

 

            The Psalmist prays for help on behalf of the oppressed church,

particularly on behalf of Joseph and Benjamin, ver. 1-3, and

describes, in mournful language, their oppression in ver. 4-7.

In ver. 8-13, Israel appears under the image of a vine tree,

which at first is carefully attended to, and had spread forth luxu-

riantly, but now had become altogether destroyed. In ver.

19, the Psalmist prays that God would again take this vine tree

under his gracious protection.

            Ver. 1-7 are evidently to be considered as an Introduction;

and the individual character of the Psalm is to be found in the

figure of the vine tree.

            The formal arrangement is obvious,—so obvious, that light is

thrown from this Psalm upon others, where otherwise there would

have been ground for uncertainty; and even from this Psalm alone,

the significance of the numbers in the arrangement of the Psalms is

placed beyond a doubt. The whole, inclusive of the significant

title, contains twenty verses, two decades. The introduction con-

tains seven, and the main division twelve,—the numbers of the

 


8                   THE BOOK OF PSALMS.

 

covenant, and of the covenant people. The seven is divided into

three and four, the preliminary complaint and the preliminary

petition; the twelve is divided into six and six, the expanded

complaint, which comes in immediately after the preliminary one,

and the expanded prayer, the first and the last verses of which

are the same.

            The fundamental tone of the whole Psalm is given in the words:

"0 God, lead us back, and cause thy face to shine, and us to be

delivered." These words occur three times, like the Mosaic bles-

sing to which they allude, for the purpose of making a deeper

impression upon the mind,a at the end of the first and of the se-

cond part of the Introduction, ver. 3 and 7, and at the end of the

main division and of the whole, ver. 19: the names of God in

these same verses are arranged in an ascending series,—God,

ver. 3; God of Hosts, ver. 7; Jehovah, God of Hosts, ver. 19.

They are wanting at the end of the first part of the main division,

because it is bound together by the unity of the figure of the vine

tree; the twelve also is not so decidedly divided by the six, which

is destitute of any meaning of its own, as is the seven by the three

and the four. The beginning, moreover, of the second half of the

main division is externally indicated by the address, "0 God of

Hosts," ver. 14, just as the beginning of the second part of the

Introduction by the address, "Jehovah, God of Hosts," ver. 4,

indicating the termination prescribed for the refrain, to which it

had to advance by degrees.

            The Psalm is a remarkable testimony on behalf of the catholic

spirit by which the true church of God has been always pervaded

—an illustration of the apostolic saying, "when one member suf-

fers, all the members suffer along with it." Like the seventy-

seventh Psalm, to which it is closely allied, it gives adequate ex-

pression to the painful feelings awakened in Judah's mind by the

captivity of the ten tribes; comp. the three times repeated "lead

us back," ver. 3, 7, 19. The Septuagint have already with ac-

curacy written: u[pe>r tou?   ]Assuri<ou. For it is incontrovertibly

evident, from reasons which never would have been overlooked,

had it not been for the perverse disposition to assign to the Psalms

 

            a Calvin: God did not design to dictate a vain repetition of words to his people; but

this support is frequently held out to them, when oppressed with evils, in order that

nevertheless they may courageously arise.

 


                                   PSALM LXXX.                                  9

 

the latest possible date, that we cannot refer the Psalm with se-

veral interpreters, to the Chaldean invasion, nor yet, with others,

to the times of the Maccabees, nor indeed to any suffering which

befel Judah. 1. The vine tree appears as destroyed to a consi-

derable extent, and even as deprived partly of its branches, but

still it is standing in the holy land: the people of the Lord ap-

pear, as is evident from the thrice-repeated prayer, lead us back,

partly as led away; and yet they are also in possession of their

own land, as is manifest from the title, "to the Chief Musician,"

which is wanting in Ps. lxxiv. and lxxix., and which marks out

this Psalm as designed for a public service in the temple. By

this the reference to the Chaldean destruction is wholly excluded.

2. In the very first verse, God is addressed by the title: he who

leads Joseph like a flock. The idea is altogether untenable that

Joseph, who appears always as the leader of the ten tribes, and

who is spoken of, in Ps. lxxviii. 67, in opposition to Judah, is

here used for the whole of Israel, or for Judah, in whom Israel at

the time existed. Even in Obed. ver. 18, the house of Joseph

denotes the ten tribes (comp. Caspari), and, in like manner, in

Amos vi. 6, Joseph is used only of the ten tribes; comp. Ch. B.

Michaelis. 3. In ver. 2, the tribes on whose behalf the help of

God is supplicated are Ephraim, Benjamin, and Manasseh.

Every thing here depends upon determining whether, in the divi-

sion of the state into two kingdoms, the Benjamites adhered to

Judah or to Joseph. The general view is in favour of the first.

(Comp. for example Winer in his dic., Gesenius in his Thesau-

rus.)  It is, however, involved here in inextricable difficulties; as

if Benjamin belonged to the kingdom of Judah, and this Psalm

refers to the misery of the whole people, there can be no reason

assigned why Benjamin is named here, and not Judah. We, on

the other hand, maintain that, with the exception of Jerusalem,

which lay close on the boundaries of Judah, by whom it was con-

quered, and by whom, in common with Benjamin, it was inhabited

(comp. Raumer, p. 334), and of that portion of its environs which

lay on the side of Benjamin, the declivity, namely, slanting down,

from the upper city, Benjamin adhered to Joseph. The presump-

tions are all in favour of this view. Benjamin and Joseph were

bound together by ties of an ancient character. They were both

the darling sons of beloved Rachel (Gen. xliv. 27-29), and were

 


10                   THE BOOK OF PSALMS.

 

united to each other in the tenderest affection, Gen. xliii. 29-

30-34. In travelling through the wilderness we find them as

here united to each other; comp. Num. ii. 17, &c., x. 21-24. It

is clear, from 2 Sam. xix. 21, that the bond of union between

Joseph and Benjamin was very close even in David's time: in

this passage Simei says that he comes first of the whole house of

Joseph. Further, Benjamin is the very last tribe who can be

supposed to have entertained any friendly feeling towards Judah,

inasmuch as the honour and pre-eminence which belonged to it

during the reign of Saul was transferred to Judah (comp. 1 Sam.

xxii. 7); and history affords evidence that, even in David's time,

there existed a spirit of deep-rooted hostility. Shimei, on the

rebellion of Absalom, gave utterance to the spirit of the tribe;

the rebel Sheba (2 Sam. xxi. 1) belonged to Benjamin: and at

the numbering of the people, with the exception of Levi, which,

from the nature of the case, could not be included, the only tribe

which was not numbered was Benjamin, undoubtedly because

Joab did not choose to provoke its seditious spirit. If we turn

now to the evidence in support of the opposite view, we find, as

wholly favouring it, the passage 1 Kings xii. 21, according to

which Rehoboam assembled the whole house of Judah and the

tribe of Benjamin. But a whole series of other passages demon-

strates that the author loosely, though, after all, with sufficient

accuracy, as the real state of matters was universally known, em-

ployed the tribe of Benjamin to denote that small portion of the

tribe which was incorporated with Judah, so that we are to supply

as understood: so far as it remained faithful to Judah. Accord-  

ing to 1 Kings xi. 13, 32, 36, xii. 20, it was only the single

tribe of Judah that remained with the house of David; and it is

utterly preposterous to suppose that in all these passages Benja-

min, which always occupied a place of distinguished honour among

the tribes, is passed over in silence, on account of its littleness.

In 1 Kings xii. 17, the only individuals not Jews who submitted

to the government of Rehoboam are "the children of Israel who

dwelt in the cities of Judah." This passage forms the connecting

link between xii. 21 and the passages above quoted, and gives to

the former the necessary limitation. Further, if we join Benja-

min to Judah, it will be impossible to make out the ten tribes;

for Simeon, who is commonly reckoned among them, manifestly

 


                                 PSALM LXXX.                                11

 

cannot be counted. That tribe, according to Gen. xlix. 7, ought

to be found like Levi, broken up into pieces; according to Jos.

xix. 1, "its inheritance was in the midst of the tribe of Judah,"

not certainly any contiguous portion of the land, but separate,

single cities, lying at a distance from each other: comp. Bachiene

i. 2, 408. The Simeonites belong, assuredly, to "the children

of Israel who dwelt in the cities of Judah," as their cities origi-

nally were situated within the tribe of Judah, and are enumerated

in the list of these cities, Bach. § 409. They must necessarily

have held fast by Judah, and probably did so very willingly: it

was quite natural that they should amalgamate with Judah, and

this is sufficient to explain the fact that they are nowhere men-

tioned as a part of the kingdom of Judah: on the division into

two kingdoms they became extinct as a tribe. This peculiar

state of matters explains 1 Kings xi. 30, &c., according to which

the whole number of the tribes was twelve, of which one remained

faithful to the house of David, and ten took part with Jeroboam.  

Now, if we leave out Simeon, it becomes necessary to take in

Benjamin, in order to complete the number ten.—It is, therefore,

evident that the three passages above quoted represent Israel

only in a limited sense, whose leading tribes they name, in ac-

cordance with original historical relations, and agreeably to later

usage; and, therefore, the Psalm cannot be referred either to the

Babylonian captivity or to the times of the Maccabees.a

            Title: To the Chief Musician, on lilies, a testimony of Asaph,

a Psalm. This title is formed in an original manner after those of

the two Davidic Psalms, the sixtieth and the sixty-ninth. "To the

Chief Musician" is important, because it skews that the Psalmist

is here acting as the organ of the whole church. Instead of lx  

pointing out the object (comp. at title of Ps. vi.) we have lf in

the two fundamental passages, The lilies are an emblem of what is

lovely (comp. at Ps. xlv.), here, as in Ps. lxix., of the lovely salva-

tion of the Lord, his tvfvwy: comp. hfwvn with which the re-

frain generally ends, the peculiarly prominent word of the Psalm,

and the htfvwy, in ver. 2. The tvdf, which, on account of the ac-

cusative, cannot be connected with Mynww, signifies always law

 

            a Calvin: It would have been absurd to have passed over the tribe Judah, and the

sacred city itself, and to have given the prominence to Joseph, Manasseh, Ephraim, and

Benjamin, if the language had not been designed to apply specially to Israel.

 


12                 THE BOOK OF PSALMS.

 

(comp. at Ps. lx. title), and generally denotes the divine law, as

given in the Books of Moses; in this way also it is used in the

Asaphic Psalms lxxviii. 5, lxxxi. 5. That it is used in the

same sense here also, that the Psalmist designates his poem a

law, because he does not prescribe a way of salvation at his own

hand, but merely points to the one which had already been de-

scribed in the law, and comes forward as its expounder, is evi-

dent from the reference to the title of Ps. lx., where the original

itself from which the Psalmist merely copies, is named tvdf,

and from the fact that the Psalm really throughout depends

upon the law, especially the refrain which gives its fundamental

tone. The particular application of tvdf is to be got from the

word immediately preceding, on the lilies: "a law which treats

of the way of obtaining deliverance."a  The Jsxl tvdf, cor-

responds to the Jsxl lykWm an instruction of Asaph in

Psalms lxxiv. and lxxviii.; but it is a stronger and more em-

phatic expression: comp. also, Hear, my people, my law in Ps.

lxxviii. 1.

            Ver. 1-3.--Ver. 1. 0 thou Shepherd of Israel give ear, who

leadest Joseph as the sheep; thou who sittest enthroned upon the

cherubim, shine forth. Ver. 2. Before Ephraim, and Benjamin,

and Manasseh, stir up thy strength and come for help to us.

Ver. 3. 0 God, lead us back, and cause thy face to shine, and us

to be delivered.—The "thou Shepherd of Israel," in ver. 1 (comp.

at Ps. xxiii. 1), refers to Gen. xlviii. 15; xlix. 24, where in

Joseph's blessing God is named the Shepherd of Israel. The

expression, "who leadest Joseph," &c., is the development of the

first clause, and marks directly that part of Israel who at this

time stood particularly in need of the shepherd care of God. In

the second clause prominence is given to the omnipotence of God

as the second foundation of the deliverance, just as in the first

his care for his people had been especially dwelt upon. It is

omnipotence that is indicated by, "thou sittest enthroned upon

the cherubim:" comp. at Ps. xviii. 10. The cherubim of the

sanctuary are the emblem of the earthly creation. God's sitting

above these indicates that this sublunary world with all its powers

is subject to him and serves him.  "God of hosts" corresponds

 

            a Venema: that the pious, when placed in dreadful trouble, might be instructed in

the true way of obtaining deliverance and salvation.

 


                      PSALM LXXX. VER. 4-7.                          13

 

to this appellation of God, and denotes as exclusively God's

dominion over the heavenly powers as the expression before us

denotes his dominion over those of earth. In reference to shine-

forth, comp. at Ps. 1. 2. Allusion is made, as appears, to the

resplendent symbol of the presence of God during the march

through the wilderness. In ver. 2, Benjamin "the little," stands

between Ephraim and Manasseh. "Before them:"—that is,

leading them forward, at their head, as formerly before Israel in

the pillar of cloud and the pillar of fire: comp. Deut. xiii. 21, 22,

"and the Lord went before them," &c. Thy strength:—which

now slumbers,—comp. Ps. lxxviii. 65.—The "lead us back," in

ver. 3, refers to that portion of the people who had been led into

captivity, and who had been described with sufficient distinctness

in the preceding clauses, and whom the Psalmist, sympathising

with a suffering member, keeps throughout prominently before

his eye. The usual sense of bvw in Hiph. is to lead back

(comp. Gen. xxviii. 15, where Jacob, who in his exile beyond the

Euphrates, and in his restoration to Canaan, typified the fate of

his people, is addressed by God, I bring thee back to this place,

Jer. xii. 15; xvi. 15; xxx. 3): and there is no ground whatever

to depart from this usual sense here; more especially as in the

12th and 13th verses we find a lamentation expressed in figu-

rative language over a considerable portion of the people who had

been led into captivity. The sense to bring back to a former

condition, to restore (Luther: comfort us), is of very rare occur-

rence, indeed occurs with certainty only in one passage, Dan.

ix. 25: comp. the Christology, p. 2, p. 456. "Cause thy face

to shine," is demanded as a fulfilment of the Mosaic blessing,  

Num. vi. 25: comp. at Ps. iv. 6; xxxi. 16.

            Ver. 4-7.—Ver. 4. 0 Lord God, God of hosts, how long

dost thou smoke against the prayer of thy people? Ver. 5.

Thou feedest them with tear-bread, and givest them drink in a

great measure full of tears. Ver. 6. Thou placest us for conten-  

tion to our neighbours, and our enemies make merry. Ver. 7. 0

God, God of hosts, bring us back, and cause thy face to shine

upon us, and us to be delivered. A heaping up of the names of

God similar to that in ver. 4, occurs also in the first verse of the

fiftieth Psalm, another of the Psalms of Asaph. In prayer,

every thing depends upon God, in the full glory of his being,

 


14                    THE BOOK OF PSALMS.

 

walking before the soul. It is only into the bosom of such a

God that it is worth while to pour out lamentations and prayers.

"Jehovah," corresponding to "thou Shepherd of Israel," in ver.

1, points to the fulness of the love of God towards his people;

and "God, God of hosts" corresponding to "who sittest enthron-

ed upon the cherubim," to his infinite power to help them. The

Elohim Zebaoth causes no difficulty if we only explain cor-

rectly Jehovah Zebaoth: comp. Ps. xxiv. 10. It is manifest

from, comparing the fundamental passage, Deut. xxix. 19, and

the parallel Asaph. passage Ps. lxxiv. 1, that the smoke comes

into notice only as the attendant of fire. It is clear also from

these passages that we must translate against, not at the prayer

of thy people. There is a significant reference to smoke as the

standing symbol of prayer, and to its embodiment in the burnt

offering: comp. Ps. cxli. 2. Rev. v. 8; viii. 3, 4. Is. vi. 4, "the

house was full of smoke," Beitr. iii. 644. The smoke of prayer,

according to Lev. xvi. 13, should smother the fire of the wrath

of God: but instead of this, God opposes the smoke of his anger

to the smoke of prayer. In ver. 5, tear-bread is not at all bread

destroyed by tears, but bread composed of tears. This is mani-

fest from the parallel passages: comp. at Ps. xlii.3, and the second

clause: as the tears are drink there, they must be bread here.

It cannot always be, that the Shepherd of Israel, of whom it is

said, Ps. xxiii. 5, "thou preparest before me a table in presence

of my enemies, . . . my cup overfloweth," prepares nothing

but tears for the food and the drink of his people. That were a

very singular quid pro quo. The second clause can only be

translated: thou causest them to drink with a measure of tears.

For hqwh is constantly construed with the accusative of the per-

son and the thing; but it never occurs with b, before the thing.

The "measure" is thus the thing that is given to drink (the wylw  

as the name of a measure occurs only in one other passage, Is.

xl. 12; there is no need for defining its size, it was, at all events,

large for tears):  "of tears" denotes the contents of the measure.—

Ver. 6 alludes to Ps. xliv. 13, on which also Ps. lxxix. 4 depends.

The neighbours are always the petty tribes in the immediate neigh-

bourhood of Israel (several interpreters refer incorrectly to the As-

syrians and Egyptians), who always availed themselves of those

occasions when Israel was oppressed by more powerful nations, to

 


                       PSALM LXXX. VER. 8-13.                        15

 

give vent to their hatred. The Nvdm the object, the butt of

rage expressed in actions, but especially in bitter contempt,

"where is now their God?" &c.  The vml as the dat. comm.,

i.e., according to the heart's desire.

            Ver. 8-13.—Ver. 8. Thou broughtest a vine out of Egypt,

thou didst remove the heathen and didst plant it. Ver. 9. Thou

didst make room before it, and it struck its roots and filled

the land. Ver. 10. The mountains were covered with its sha-

dow, and the cedars of God with its branches. Ver. 11. It

sent its boughs to the sea and its shoots to the river. Ver. 12.

Why then hast thou broken down its wall, so that everything

that passes by plunders it? Ver. 13. The boar out of the forest

wastes it, and whatever stirs in the field feeds of it.—God can-

not leave off, far less destroy a work which he has once begun;

this is the truth on which depends the significance of the con-

trast between the once and the now. The fundamental passage

for the figurative representation is Gen. xlix. 22, where Joseph,

to whom the eye of the Psalmist is continually directed, appears,

in reference to his joyful prosperity, as a wall tree by a fountain,

whose branches rose high above the walls. The difference is  

only this, that here instead of the fruit tree, the vine is intro-

duced, after the example of Isaiah in ch. v. 1-7, where Israel

appears as the vineyard of the Lord. It is obvious from the fun-

damental passage, and from the expanded description which fol-

lows, that the point of comparison next to the abundance of beau-

tiful fruit is the luxuriant growth: comp. Hos. xiv. 7, "They

shall grow as the vine."—That the fysh in ver. 8 is to be taken

in its usual sense, to cause to depart, which it maintains even in

Job xix. 10, is evident on comparing the Asaphic passage, from

which it is immediately borrowed, Ps. lxxviii. 52, and the funda-

mental passages, Ex. xii. 37; xv. 22, on which this depends.

An affirmation may be made in regard to the spiritual, which

could not be applied to the natural vine. "Thou didst remove the

heathen" is taken from Ps. lxxviii. 55, which again depends upon

Ex. xxiii. 28; xxxiii. 2; xxxiv. 11. The sons of Asaph always

follow in the footsteps of their father.  The "plant" is from Ps.

xliv. 2, to which allusion is also made in ver. 12. The Berleb.:

“Shall all this be for nought and in vain?  Or hast thou plant-

ed it on this account, that the enemies might devour it?" On

 


16                   THE BOOK OF PSALMS.

 

hnp in Ps. vii. "to clear," "to clear out," in ver. 10, comp.

the Christol. 404. It corresponds to "the clearing out of the

stones" of Is. v. 2, and refers to the removal of the original inha-

bitants of the country. Instead of "it struck its roots," Luther

has falsely, "Thou hast made it strike its roots."—The funda-

mental passages for verses 11 and 12 are Gen. xxviii. 14, where

it is said in the promise to Jacob, "thou stretch out on the west

and on the east, on the north and on the south," and especially

Deut. xi. 24, "every place which the sole of your feet shall tread

upon shall be yours, from the wilderness and Lebanon, from the

river, the river Euphrates, even unto the west sea shall be your

boundaries:"—comp. Josh. i. 4. God had in former times glori-

ously fulfilled the promises contained in these passages. hlc  

and hypnf are in reality both accusatives governed by vsk

Pü; the mountains which were covered with the shadow of

the vine are the mountains on the south of Canaan, the hill coun-

try of Judah, particularly the southermost part of the same, the

hill country of the Amorites, which at the commencement of Is-

rael's country met the traveller like a wall; comp. Raumer p.

48. "The wilderness of mountains" is introduced in Ps. lxxv. 7

as the southern boundary, in the same way as the mountains are

here spoken of as the most southern portion of the land. The

cedars of God (comp. at Ps. xxxvi. 6) which the boughs of the

vine ascend and cover, are, as usual, those of Lebanon (comp. Ps.

xxix. 5; xcii. 13; civ. 16), which formed the north boundary

of Canaan: comp. Ps. xxix., where Lebanon and the wilderness

of Kadesh stand opposed to each other as the northern and

southern boundaries of Canaan. The sea is the Mediterranean,

the river, Euphrates. From this antithesis the translation falls

to the ground: and his boughs were cedars of God,—which

would bring out a monstrous figure.—The hrx to pluck (else-

where only in Song of Sol. v. 1), applies not to the grapes but to

the branches:—the luxuriance of the branches formed the subject

of the preceding description; and the opposite of that state is

described in this clause, as it is in Is. v. 5, Ps. lxxxix. 40, 41.

All who pass by time way: Berleb.:  "for example, Pul, Tiglath-

pileser, Salmanasser, Senacherib."— The boar from the forest

(comp. Jerem. v. 4) is according to the analogy of Ps. lxviii. 30.

Ez. xxix. 3, where the hippopotamos and the crocodile are em-

 


                       PSALM LXXX. VER. 14-19.                          17

 

blem of Pharaoh, and Ez. xvii., where the eagle indicates Ne-

buchadnezar, descriptive not of the enemies generally, but of the

king of Assyria. "Whatever stirs in the field" (zyz, is from the

Asaph. Ps. 1. 11, the only other passage where it is used of

beasts), denotes the whole mass of the nations serving under

him.a

            Ver. 14-19.—Ver. 14. 0 God, God of hosts, turn yet back,

look from heaven and behold and visit this vine. Ver. 15. And

maintain that which thy right hand has planted, and the Son

whom, thou hast made strong for thyself.  Ver. 16. It is burned

with fire, cut down, before the rebuke of thy countenance they

perish. Ver. 17. May thy hand be upon the man of thy right

hand, the Son of Man whom thou hast made strong for thyself.

Ver. 18. We will not go back, quicken thou us and we will call

upon thy name. Ver. 19. Lord, God, God of hosts, lead us

back, cause thy face to shine and us to be delivered.—The be-

ginning of the prayer in the main division, ver. 14 is connected

with the beginning of the prayer in the introduction, ver. 1. The

hnk; ver. 15, is the imper. of Nnk, to make firm, comp. the pro-

per noun, vhynnk, whom Jehovah hath established. It is con-

strued first with the accusative, and afterwards with lf, which

denotes the care and the protection. Against the idea that it

is to be considered as a noun, in the sense of a slip, it may be

urged, that there is no such noun, that the reference to the 8th

verse demands that it be the vine-tree that is here spoken of,

and that the following verse refers to the vine as if it had pre-

viously been spoken of. The Son of the second clause is just the

spiritual vine. The translation, a shoot, according to Gen. xlix.

22, is not only against ver. 17, but also against the sense, as it

is not any particular shoot, but the whole vine that is here spo-

ken of. The Cmx should be taken in its usual sense, to make

strong (comp. the proper noun, Amaziah,) rather than in the

sense of to choose, which depends upon the single and very doubt-

ful passage, Is. xliv. 14. The singular, of rare occurrence else-

where, here and in ver. 17, is accounted for by the allusion to

the name of Benjamin, whom the Psalmist here considers as the

representative of all Israel.  Thy right hand and, Son ought to

 

            a Berleb: The beasts represent, in the inner man, the destructive passions by which

the vineyard of the soul is torn up and consumed.

 


18                     THE BOOK OF PSALMS.

 

read with italics, for the purpose of making this allusion obvious.

The Son of the right hand is the Son who stands at the right

hand of his earthly and his heavenly father, and who is, conse-

quently, protected by him: Gen. xliv. 20, "his father loves

him," and Deut. xxxiii. 12, "the beloved of the Lord," are to

be considered as explanations of the name. In so far as Jacob

gave this significant name to his son, under the guidance and in-

spiration of God, it was a pledge of the divine love and help for

him, and, at the same time, for all Israel, with whom he is inter-

woven. The subject in "they perish," in ver. 16, is the chil-

dren of Israel, the spiritual vine.a—Ver. 18 alludes to Ps, xliv.

18, "our heart has not turned back, nor have our steps declined

from thy paths." Israel could not say so now; they have de-

served their misery, they have turned aside to many ways, and,

instead of the name of the Lord, they have called upon strange

gods (comp. Ps. lxxix. 6), but they promise better; if the Lord

will bring them back unto life (Ps. lxxi. 20), they also will walk

in a new life. The guilt of Israel is very tenderly touched.

The Psalmist has no intention of acting the part of Job's friends,

he follows the admonition of Job:  "have pity upon me, have

pity upon me, my friends, for the hand of God is upon me." God

has undertaken to rebuke, ver. 16, and therefore his servants may

well be silent.

 

 

                                  PSALM LXXXI.

 

            The exhortation to celebrate the passover with joyful heart,

ver. 1-3, is followed by the basis on which it rests, ver. 4-7:

the passover is the festival of Israel's deliverance, through their

Lord and God, from great trouble and deep misery. While the

first part points to what the Lord has done for Israel, the second

describes the position which Israel ought to occupy towards

their Lord: inasmuch as the Lord, who brought Israel out of

Egypt, is thus alone Israel's God, sufficient for all his necessities.

Israel ought therefore to serve him alone, and leave to the world

its imaginary deities,—a preposition, however, to which Israel,

 

            a Calvin:  "Let us learn, whenever the anger of God burns forth, even in the midst

of the flames of the conflagration to cast our griefs into the bosom of God, who wonder-

fully revives his church from destruction.

 


                                   PSALM LXXXI.                                  19

 

alas, has not hitherto responded,—and hence the origin of all his

troubles, ver. 8-12. Would that he would now become obe-

dient to the Lord! the salvation of his kingdom would be the

consequence, ver. 13-16.

            In ver. 1-5 the Psalmist speaks, as is manifest from the con-

clusion of ver. 5, as the representative of the better self of the

church, or, in the language of the Apocalypse, as its angel; and

in the 6th and following verses the speaker is the Lord. But

that this distinction, which has commonly been a great deal too

much spoken of, is one of no moment, is evident from the fact,

that vers. 6 and 7 are nothing else than a continuation of ver. 5,

and from the conclusion, vers. 15 and 16, where the address of the

Lord, and the address of the Psalmist, who speaks in the spirit

of the Lord, are immediately linked together.

            If we keep this in view, the formal arrangement of the Psalm

becomes easy and simple. The Psalm falls into two main divi-

sions, an objective and a subjective one, which are even exter-

nally separated from each other by a Selah, at the end of ver. 7.

The first, ver. 1-7, is completed in seven verses. This, as

usual, is divided into a three and a four. The second main divi-

sion contains, in the first instance, only nine verses, and is di-

vided by a five and a four. The defect of the conclusion, how-

ever, is, as in the case in Ps. lxxvii:, compensated by the title.

The arrangement, therefore, is exactly the same as that which

obtains universally in Psalms which contain 17 verses.

            According to the title, "To the Chief Musician after the

manner of Gath (comp. at title of Ps. viii.) by Asaph," the

Psalm was composed by Asaph. We shewed already, at Ps.

lxxiv., that we must adhere to the Asaph who belonged to the  

age of David, in all the Psalms which bear this name, except in

those cases in which the contents of the Psalm render this im-

possible. In the present instance this is not the case. "The

contents," observes Köster, "are of a general character, and the

freshness of tone indicates the great age of the Psalm." The

verbal reasons which led Hitzig to assign it a very late date are

of no consequence. He refers to the loose Jsvhy in ver. 5, and

to the participle after vl in ver. 13. But that the retention of

the h of the Hiph. (Ew. §. 284), is not at all characteristic of

the language of later times, is evident, among other passages,

 


20                      THE BOOK OF PSALMS.

 

from Ps. xlv. 17, and from 1 Sam. xxii. 47. These forms are

throughout poetical, and are altogether independent of time.

Poetry is fond of full and sonorous expressions. It can never be

shewn that the position of the participle after vl is characteristic

of a later idiom; comp. 2 Sam. xviii. 12. In favour, however, of

the Asaph of David's tithe, we have to urge the prophetic cha-

racter which our Psalm bears in common with the other produc-

tions of this bard, the "seer," the prophet among the Psalmists,

Ps. 1., lxxiii., lxxviii. (even Hitzig believed that he heard in the 

warnings here the voice of the author of the seventy-eighth

Psalm), and lxxxii. To this we may add the striking connection

between ver. 8 here, and Ps. 1. 7.

            Ver. 1-3.—Ver. 1. Sing aloud to God, who is our strength,

make a joyful-noise unto the God of Jacob. Ver. 2. Raise the

song, and give the timbrel, the lovely guitar with the harp.

Ver. 3. Blow in the month the horn, at the full moon, on the

day of our feast.--The exhortation to praise God with all the

might depends for its significance, as the second part of the

strophe shews, upon its pointing to the rich treasures of salvation

which he has imparted to his people.—On "our strength," comp.

as a commentary vers. 14, 15, and Ps. xlvi. 1. The Lord mani-

fested himself as the strength of his people on their deliverance

from Egypt.  In ver. 3 the instruments are introduced in regard

to their tone: timbrel stands instead of sound of the timbrel.

Against the exposition "bring hither the timbrels," it may be 

urged, that, according to the title and verse 2d, those addressed

are called upon both to sing and to play.—In verse 3 the month

is the first and the chief month of the year, the month in which

the passover occurred: comp. Ex. xii. 1, 2:  "And the Lord said

to Moses and Aaron in the land of Egypt, This month shall be

to you the chief of months, it shall be the first month of the year

to you."  "In the full moon" of the second clause defines ex-

actly the time within the sacred month which belonged to the

festival. The general and special descriptions are connected with

each other exactly in the same way in Lev. xxiii. 5: "In the

first month, on the 14th day of the month, is the passover to the

Lord." In other passages throughout the law it is merely the

general descriptions that occur; thus, Ex. xxxiv. 18: "The

feast of unleavened bread shalt thou keep, seven days shalt thou

 


                        PSALM LXXXI. VER. 1-3.                       21

 

eat unleavened bread, at the time of the month Abib" (comp. on

the passage the Beitr. p. 361 ss. on Abib p. 364), Deut. xvi.

1:  "Observe the month Abib, for in the month Abib the Lord

thy God brought thee out of Egypt:" comp. on the passage the

Beitr. p. 365.  According to the common construction, wdH sig-

nifies the new moon; throughout the Pentateuch, however, it

invariably signifies a month; and everywhere, even in the later

scriptures, it retains this signification, with this difference, that

sometimes the month stands for the festival peculiar to the month.

And the following grounds are decisive the other way. 1. As it

is undoubted that hsk signifies full moon, we have two festivals

according to this view—a supposition very unlikely in itself, and

the more so that no inward connection whatever is indicated be-

tween the new moon and the full moon festival.  2. The con-

tents of the Psalm shew that it was composed exclusively for

use at the passover. The festival for which it was set apart was,

according to ver. 5, instituted at the departure from Egypt, and

according to verses 6, 7, and 10, stands in immediate reference

to this deliverance;--that the new moon of the month Abib was

celebrated as, a preparation for the passover is altogether an arbi-

trary assumption. 3. The horn (not at all the trumpets named

in Num. x. 10) appears here only as one among many instruments,

while the sound of drums for the new moons, and especially for

the 7th of the month, was the peculiar and characteristic cere-

mony. Such an amount of musical power as is here desired was

not suitable for this festival. 4. There is no doubt that our verse

as supplementing the title fixes the character of the Psalm. This,

however, it cannot do, if wdH signify the new moon. In this

case, in consequence of the indefinite nature, “in the new moon,”

which demands explanation from what follows, we have our atten-

tion directed exclusively to "in the full moon;" and are thus left

to waver in uncertainty, as the example of Gesenins shows, be-

tween the full moon of the passover and of the feast of taber-

nacles.a—The idea of those who, after the example of Luther (in

our festival of booths), understand the feast of tabernacles, is

confuted by the preceding context. By this reference, it becomes

 

            a It is clear from Prov. vii. 20, and also from the Syr. (See Gesen.), that hsk denotes

in general the full moon, and not at all, as has been supposed, specially the feast of ta-

bernacles.


22                        THE BOOK OF PSALMS.

 

altogether impossible to understand the Psalm. The expression

"on the day of our feast" is also in favour of the passover. The

passover, which celebrates the fundamental deed of God on be-

half of his church, is the feast: comp. the Christol. ii. p. 565.

Beitr. iii. p. 80. The feast of tabernacles never has this name,

not even in 2 Chron. v. 3.—The correct interpretation of this

verse is destructive of the position taken up by Venema, that the

Psalm was composed for the celebration of the passover under

Hezekiah; for this took place, according to 2 Chon. xxx. 2, con-

trary to the usual custom, in the second month. The account of

this celebration, however, is so far of importance to rev. 1-3, as

it shows that at that times music and singing formed a very im-

portant part of the celebration of the passover: comp. 2 Chron.

xxx. 21, 22.

            Ver. 4-7.—Ver. 4. For it is a law for Israel, a right for

the God of Jacob. Ver. 5. Such a commandment he gave to

Joseph, when he brought him over Egypt land, where I heard

a language unknown to me. Ver. 6. I removed from the bur-

den his shoulder, his hands were set free from the burden-bas-

kets. Ver. 7. In the distress thou didst call and I delivered

thee. I heard thee in the thunder-cover. I proved thee at the

waters of strife. Selah.—In ver. 4, the law for Israel and the

right for the God of Jacob correspond. God, by the deliverance

which he has wrought out, has acquired a right to the thanks of

Israel, and it is Israel's duty, by rendering obedience to the ap-

pointed law of the passover, to implement this right. Israel does

not celebrate the passover at his own hand, he only pays to God

what is his due,—a due demanded on the ground of mercies be-

stowed. It is this that distinguishes all festivals belonging to

the true religion from those connected with religions that are

false; the former depends throughout upon the foundation of

a salvation imparted by God, and assumes the character of a

right and a duty. The xvh refers to the festivals in general.

The individual expressions of festive joy spoken of in ver. 1-3

had not been expressly commanded in the law. They are, how-

ever, accidents which necessarily accompany the substance.—In

ver. 5-7, the deed is more particularly described on which the

right of God and the duty of Israel are founded. In reference to

Hvdf a testimony, next a law, comp. at Ps. xix. 7, lxxviii, 5.


23                      PSALM LXXXI. VER. 4-7.

 

Joseph occupies the place of Israel here, because, during the whole

period of the residence in the land of Egypt, the nation owed

every thing to Joseph, "the crowned one among his brethren,"

Gen. xlix. 26; their whole existence there was founded on the

services which Joseph had rendered to Egypt; comp. Ex. i. 8,

according to which, the oppression of Israel arose from the new

king, who did not know Joseph. It was only during this period

of his existence that Israel could bear the name of Joseph; and

it is altogether incorrect to generalize what is founded singly and

entirely on the special circumstances connected with that period.

The passage before us has assuredly nothing whatever to do with

Ps. lxxvii. 15 and lxxx. i. The suffix in vtxcb refers to Jo-

seph. "Out of Egypt" is the expression which commonly

occurs in the Pentateuch; comp. Ex. xi. 41, "All the armies

of the Lord went out from the land of Egypt," ver. 51, Num.

xxii. 5, Deut. ix. 7; particularly in connection with the feast of

the passover, comp. Ex. xxxiv. 18, "Thou shalt keep the feast

of unleavened bread, seven days shalt thou eat unleavened

bread as I have commanded thee at the time of the month Abib,

for in the month Abib thou wentest out of Egypt." Here, how-

ever, the expression is "over Egypt," across, lf, in the same

sense in which it occurs in Job xxix. 7, "When I went out to the

gate over or across the city." This over is more expressive than

out of. The marching out appears all the more glorious, inas-

much as the marching extended over the whole country, across

Egypt. Num. xxxiii. 4 supplies the commentary,—"The chil-

dren of Israel went out with a high hand before all the Egyp-

tians;" comp. Ex. xiv. 8.a Many expositors have suffered them-

selves to be led astray by the lf. They translate: when he.

(the Lord) went forth against the land of Egypt, with reference

to Ex. xi. 4, "About midnight I go out in the land of Egypt."

Against this, however, we may urge, besides the manifest refer-

ence to the passage from the Pentateuch above referred to, the

obviously corresponding expression "who led thee out of the land

of Egypt," in ver. 11. There is next added very suitably, accord-

ing to the first-mentioned rendering, "where I heard a language

 

            a Calvin: The people, led on by God, traversed freely the whole land of Egypt, a pas-

sage having been afforded them in consequence of the broken and terrified state of the

inhabitants.


24                    THE BOOK OF PSALMS.

 

unknown to me," an expression which denotes more exactly the

oppressive nature of their previous condition, and the unspeakable

benefit arising from their deliverance; comp. Ps. cxiv. 1, "When

Israel went out of Egypt, the house of Jacob from the people of

strange language." Finally, in the continuation in ver. 6 and 7,

the language refers entirely to the deliverance out of Egypt, and

not at all to the destruction of the first-born of the Egyptians, to

which there is nowhere else one single reference throughout the

whole Psalm. The last words of the verse indicate, as has been

already observed, what it was that rendered the departure of the

Israel so very desirable. To dwell in the midst of a people of

strange language, to serve a people from whom they were inwardly

in a state of utter estrangement, must have been very painful and

oppressive. The subject is Israel represented by the Psalmist.

We cannot translate, "a language of such a one whom," "but a lan-

guage (of the kind that) I did not understand," "a language of

unintelligibility for me;" Comp. Böttcher, proben p. 51. Many

expositors translate: the voice of one unknown to me (a God

whom I till that time did not know) I heard then in Egypt, or

I hear now, the oracle referred to in ver. 6-16. But a compa-

rison of the parallel passages, Ps. cxiv. 1, which is particularly

decisive, Deut. xxviii. 49, "The Lord will bring upon thee a

people from afar, . . . . a people whose language thou

dost not understand," Is. xxxiii. 19, and Ju. v. 15, leaves

no doubt whatever as to the correctness of the interpreta-

tion given above. Farther, the description of the miserable

condition in which Israel existed in the land of Egypt is

continued in ver. 6 and 7. To the unknown language here,

corresponds the burden, the burden-basket there; and to the

marching out here the rescuing, the delivering there. Then

the designation of Jehovah as one unknown, for the whole people,

or for the individual, to whom a revelation begins, is destitute

of all real foundation and analogy. Finally, this translation,

which proceeds from an entire misapprehension of the whole

train of thought, must be rejected on etymological grounds. hpW

never signifies a particular discourse, but a way of speaking, a

language; comp. Böttcher.--As the difference in regard to the

speaker (in ver: 6 and 7 it s the Lord that speaks, while pre-

vious to this the Psalmist, or Israel represented by him, had


                               PSALM LXXXI. VER. 4-7                         25

 

spoken in the name and spirit of the Lord) is one merely of form,

and as, in reality, verses 6 and 7 merely continue the train of

thought of ver. 5 (when the Lord removed, or, then the Lord re-

moved) it is altogether inappropriate, by marks of quotation, to

favour the idea of the beginning of a new address. Such a change

as to speakers requires very little attention to be paid to it, es-  

pecially in the Psalm of Asaph, as they are of a highly poetical

character. At the first clause of ver. 6, comp. Ex. vi. 6, 7, "I

the Lord bring you out from under the burden of the Egyptians."

The basket dvd is, according to the parallelism, the burden-

basket. Baskets of this kind were found in the sepulchral vaults

which have been opened in Thebes, of which Rosellini first fur-

nished drawings and descriptions: the Israelites used them for

carrying from one place to another the clay and manufactured

bricks: comp. Egypt and the Books of Moses, p. 79, &c.a —On.

"I heard thee in the thunder-cover," in ver. 7, comp. Hab. iii. 4,

"And there (in the lightning-flash which surrounds the Lord at

his appearance) was the hiding of his power." As in that pas-

sage God is concealed in the lightning-flash (comp. Delitzsch),

so is he here in the thunder, i. e., the thunder-cloud, "the dark-

ness," Ex. xx. 18, the storm. There is no need for assuming

that the Psalmist alludes, specially and exclusively, to Ex. xiv.

24, according to which, while the Egyptians were passing through

the sea, the Lord looked upon their chariots from the pillar of

fire and cloud, and thus completed the deliverance of the Is-

raelites. It is a common figure of poetry to represent the Lord

as riding forth in a storm, mighty against his enemies, and on

behalf of this people; comp. Ps. lxxvii. 16-18; Ps. xviii. 11:

--and hence the Psalmist has assuredly before his eyes

the whole series of Egyptian plagues. At the last clause, I

proved thee at the water of Meribah, Luther says correctly:

"he makes mention of the waters of strife in order that he may

remind them of their sins." The words do not properly belong

to the train of thought in the preceding context, which is occu-

pied only with the salvation of God. They look in the first in-

 

            a Calvin: "We may now apply the subject to ourselves: inasmuch as God has not

only removed our shoulders from burdens of bricks, and our hands from kilns, but

has redeemed us from the tyranny of Satan, and brought us up from perdition, we

are laid under much more solemn obligations than were the ancient people."


26                      THE BOOK OF PSALMS.

 

stance very like the expression of an idea which had started up

uncalled for. This apparently arbitrary reference to Israel's un-

faithfulness and ingratitude prepares the way, however, for the

following exhortation and complaint, and thus forms the connect-

ing link between the first and second portions of the Psalm. The

proving at the waters of strife, Ez. xvii. 1, &c. (comp. on the rela-

tion which this narrative bears to that at Num. xx. 1, &c., the

Beitr. p. 378, &c.) is specially referred to, because it was here

that the first proper act of rebellion took place on the part of the

people who had only a short while ago beheld the glorious deeds

of the Lord—the first manifestation of his real nature. The

proving comes into notice here in reference to the well known re-

sult by which it was followed.

            Ver. 8-12.—Ver. 8. Hear my people, and let me swear

solemnly to thee, if thou harkenest unto me. Ver. 9. Let

there not be among thee another God; and thou shalt not wor-

ship a God of the strangers. Ver. 10. I am the Lord thy God

who have brought thee out of the land of Egypt: open thy mouth

wide, I will fill it. Ver. 11. But my people does not listen to

my voice, and Israel will not be mine. Ver. 12. So I have

given them over to the wickedness of their heart, they walk in  

their own counsels.—On ver. 8, comp. Ps. 1. 7. On "my peo-

ple," Luther says: "You are my people, I have preserved, nour-

ished, and redeemed thee; therefore listen to me." As Mx is

never a particle expressive of desire, it is necessary to supply:

it will be well with thee, or something similar,—a construction

rendered also probable by comparing ver. 13. Similar ellipses

occur in Ex. xxxii. 32 ; Ps. xxvii. 17 (comp. at the passage),

Luke xix. 42; xix. 9 (see Koenöhl on the passages).—Ver. 9

and 10 depend on Ex. xx. 2, 3. It has been very unjustifiably

maintained that the first commandment stands instead of the

whole decalogue. This would deprive the thought of all point.

It was only their fathers' God, their country's God, that had ma-

nifested himself in the past as Israel's Redeemer (comp. Dent.

xxxii. 12, "the Lord alone did lead him, and there was not with

him one God of the stranger)," and thus he is still rich in help

for them; therefore they should even now serve this one God only.

—Ver. 10 is in reality connected with ver. 9 by a "Because." The

expression, "who led thee out of the land of Egypt" is literally


                        PSALM L.XXXI. VER. 10-16.                     27

 

from Deut. xx. 1. The words, "Open thy mouth wide, I will

fill it," are equivalent to "I am rich for all thy necessities, even

for thy boldest wishes," as is evident from their development in

ver. 14-16.—In ver. 11, 12, the Lord complains that Israel had

hitherto, to their own loss, failed to respond to the exhortations

addressed to them in ver. 8-10, notwithstanding the solid foun-

dation on which these rested in their deliverance. Comp. Prov.

i. 30, 31, "they would have none of my counsel, they despised

all my censures: therefore they eat the fruit of their way and

shall be satisfied with their own counsels." At ver. 11, Luther

says:  “It is something dreadful and terrible that he says my

people Israel. If it had been a stranger to whom I had mani-

fested no particular deeds of kindness, &c.” Allusion is made to

Deut. xiii. 9, where it is said, in reference to him who should

entice Israel to serve strange Gods:  "thou shalt not consent

unto him nor hearken unto him." Israel had- singularly and

shamefully reversed the matter: they had lent their ear to the

enticer and renounced their own God. The preterites denote

the past stretching forward into the present.—At ver. 12, God

lets every one take his own way; the stiff-necked Israelites who

would not have his truth and goodness, shall be given over to

error and wickedness, to their own destruction; comp. Rom. i.

24. 2 Thess. ii. 10, 11. The bl tvryrw (not hardness but

wickedness of heart) is here and everywhere else where it occurs,

Is. iii. 17; vii. 24, taken from Deut. xxix. 19. To walk in their

own counsels is to regulate the life according to them, according

to the passions of their own corrupted hearts instead of the com-

mandments of the holy God, comp. Jer. vii. 24; Is. lxv. 2:  "a

rebellious people who walk in a way that is not good, after their

own thoughts."

            Ver. 13-16. Arnd.:  "The blessed God in his great fatherly

love and faithfulness cannot leave them, he must repeat his pro-

mise and call men again to him by the offer of his gracious deeds."

—Ver. 13. If now my people did hear me, and Israel walked in

my way. Ver. 14. I would soon bring down their enemies and

turn my hand upon their adversaries. Ver. 15. The haters of

the Lord would feign submission to him, and their time would

continue for ever. Ver. 16. He would feed them with the fat of

the wheat, and out of the rock would I satisfy thee with honey.


28                     THE BOOK OF PSALMS.

 

---The vl, ver. 13, denotes the condition notwithstanding the

consciousness that it is not realized: if my people heard, which

they do not: comp. Ewald, 627. Is. xlviii. 18. The ways of

the Lord form the contrast to their own stupid and ruinous plans,

ver. 12.—The phrase "to turn the hand upon," ver. 14, is, when

taken by itself, an indefinite one, to turn it to the object of trade

or manufacture: comp. the Christol. p. 338. Here, accord-

ing to the connection, it is the punishing hand; and to turn it

back denotes the speedy overpowering of the enemies,—as for-

merly in the days of old, ver. 6 and 7: comp. particularly there

hrcb.—The first half of ver. 15 depends on Deut. xxxiii. 29:

"thy enemies shall feign to thee" (comp. at Ps. xviii. 44.) The

allusion to this passage shews that the vl is to be referred to

Israel and accounts for the singular. On "the haters of the

Lord," Luther: "Thou shouldst not think that I am favourable

to them, for they are my enemies also. But they are too strong

for thee and gain the upper hand because thou hast forsaken me.

Had it not been for this, matters would have been very different.

It is not the enemies that plague thee; it is I: mine hand it is

that oppresses thee when thine enemies oppress thee." It was

the design to give great prominence to the thought so comfort-

ing for Israel and so well fitted to lead them to reconciliation with

God, that their enemies are also the enemies of God, which led to

the expression, "the haters of the Lord," instead of "my

haters." The use of the third person in the first clause of ver.

16 is connected with this. But towards the conclusion, the usual

form is resumed. On the second clause, comp. 2 Sam. vii. 24.

The tf signifies always time, never fortune.—On ver. 16, Luther:

"For there are two things of which we stand in need, nourish-

ment and protection. Therefore, God now says, that if they turn

to him he will not only be their man of war to fight for them, but

also their husbandman: so that those who fear him and trust in

him shall want nothing that pertains to this life." The first

clause is from Deut. xxxii. 14 (the fat of the wheat is instead of

the best of the wheat), the second clause from Deut. xxxii. 13,

and he caused Israel to suck honey from the rock, oil from the

flinty rock." That the honey from the rock is not at all what

several very prosaicly have supposed, the honey which the bees

had prepared in the crevices of the rocks, but something alto-


                                  PSALM LXXXII.                                          29

 

gether unusual and supernatural (out of the hard barren rock) is

evident from the parallel clause in Deut., oil from the flinty rock,

and also from the passage, Job. xxix. 6, which in like manner

alludes to the passage in Deut.: "when I bathed my feet in milk

and the hard rock was changed for me into streams of oil."

 

 

                                  PSALM LXXXII.

 

            God appears in the midst of his church for judgment upon the

gods of the earth, the judges who bear his image, ver. 1, pun-

ishes them on account of their violation of justice, and exhorts

them to a better conduct, ver. 2-4. Still they persevere in

their want of understanding, in their walk in darkness, and every

thing is in confusion, ver. 5. The definite sentence is there-

fore passed upon them, intimation of their destruction is made

to them, ver. 6 and 7. In conclusion, the Psalmist expresses in

ver. 8 his desire for the appearance of the Lord to judgment.

            The formal arrangement is very simple. The main division is

complete in seven, which is again divided into a four and a three,

the preceding judgment, and the final decision. To the main

division, which is throughout of a prophetical character, there is

appended a lyrical conclusion, in which the Psalmist expresses

his wish for that which he had already announced as just impend-

            The question arises, whether the wicked rulers against whom

the Psalm is directed are internal or external. The last view is

the one generally entertained. The Psalm is considered as di-

rected " against the potentates of Asia about the time of the

captivity;" "the miserable, the poor," &c. are viewed as the Is-

raelites. But the only argument in favour of this view depends

upon a false interpretation of ver. 5 and 8; and there are nu-

merous and decisive reasons in favour of the reference to inter-

nal relations. Just at the very beginning God appears for judg-

ment in the "congregation of God," and there calls to account the

wicked judges who must therefore belong to it. The name

Elohim and sons of God which is given to them, is never used in

the Old Testament of heathen magistrates. It presupposes the

kingdom of God. When there is no king there can be no vice-


30                      THE BOOK OF PSALMS.

 

king. Besides, in ver. 6, in reference to this title of honour, al-

lusion is made to expressions in the Pentateuch which are applied

exclusively to Israelitish rulers. In reference to heathen rulers,

it is matter of great difficulty that those in the Psalm are accused

of nothing else than faulty administration of justice, partiality in

favour of the wicked, the denial of the rights of the poor, and so

on. The sins of the heathen judges lay entirely in another direc-

tion. And on the other hand, these very charges are brought

forward in many passages against the Israelitish rulers, for ex-

ample, Is. iii. 13-15, a passage nearly related to our Psalm, and

which may serve as a commentary to it: "the Lord standeth up

to plead, and the Lord standeth to judge the people: the Lord will

enter into judgment with the ancients of his people and the

princes thereof; for ye have eaten up the vineyard, the spoil of  

the poor is in your houses," Ch. i. 17-24. Mich. iii. 1-4.

Jer. xxii. 1, &c. If we compare carefully these passages and

likewise the passages in the Pentateuch in which the Israelitish

rulers are told their duties, such as Deut. i. 17, and also the ad-

dress of Jehosaphat to the rulers sent forth by him, it will not be

possible with a good conscience to adopt the hypothesis of hea-

then riders.

            These passages, and also the fundamental passages of the

Pentateuch, are decisive against those who would refer the Psalm

exclusively, or only especially, to kings.  It has to do with the

judges of the people, and with kings, if at all, only in so far as

they are judges. If the Psalm was composed in the time of

David, in favour of which supposition may be pleaded the pro-

phetic tone peculiar to the Asaph of that period, and against

which no tenable ground can be advanced (even Hitzig must

allow that there is no allusion of any kind, no late form or con-

necting particle, no term which could be pronounced as being

decidedly of later origin to betray an author belonging to a later

age), the Psalmist could not, in the first instance, assuredly have

referred to the king,—a view which is confirmed by the express

mention of "the princes," in ver. 7, as compared with "the

ancients of his people and the princes thereof," in Is. iii. Still

though the Psalm was in the first instance called forth by exist-

ing relations, yet being destined for all ages, it undoubtedly ad-

mits of being applied to kings in the discharge of their duty as


31                                 PSALM LXXXII.

 

judges, in so far as they are guilty of that perversion of right

here imputed to them: comp. Jos. xxii. 1, ss.

            The following remarks are designed to lead to a deeper insight

into the meaning of the Psalm. Nothing can be more unground-

ed than the assertion which in modern times has been repeatedly

made, that the God of the Old Testament is a being altogether

strange or foreign to finite beings. The Old Testament opposes

this view at its very opening, with its doctrine of the creation of

man after the image of God. With this doctrine in its com-

mencement, it cannot possibly teach in any other part that there

is an absolute opposition between God and man. Besides, in

the Law of Moses, all those whose office it is to command, to

judge; and to arbitrate, all those to whom in any respect rever-

ence and regard is due, are set apart as the representatives of God

on earth. The foundation of this is found in the commandment,

"honour thy father and mother," in the Decalogue. It was shewn

in the Beitr. P. iii. p. 605, that this commandment belongs to the

first table: thou shalt fear and honour. God, first in himself,

second in those who represent him on earth, and farther, that the

parents are named in it only in an individualising manner, as re-

presentatives of all who are possessed of worth, and are worthy

of esteem. The direction in Lev. xix. 32, rises on the foundation

of this commandment, where respect for the aged appears as the

immediate consequence of respect for God, whose eternity was de-

signed to be revered and honoured under the emblem of their old

age; also Ex. xxii. 27, according to which we are taught to re-

cognise in governors a reflection of the majesty of God: "thou shalt

not revile God, nor curse the ruler of thy people," i. e., thou shalt

not curse thy rulers (or in any one way dishonour him), for he

bears the image of God, and every insult offered to such a repre-

sentative of God in his kingdom is an insult against God, in him

God himself is honoured and revered: comp. 1 Chron. xxix. 23,  

"and Solomon sat upon the throne of Jehovah." But it was in

connection with the office of judge that the stamp of divinity was

most conspicuous, inasmuch as that office led the people under

the foreground of an humble earthly tribunal to contemplate the

background, of a lofty divine judgment; "the judgment is God's,"

Deut. i.. 17, whoever comes before it, comes before God, Ex.

xxi. 6; xxii. 7, 8.


32                       THE BOOK OF PSALMS.

 

            The position assigned to the office of judge must, when pro-

perly considered, have exerted a practical influence of a twofold

character. It must have filled those who were brought before its

tribunal with a sacred reverence for an authority which maintained

its right upon earth in the name of God. And on the part of the

judges themselves it must have led them to take a lofty view of

their calling, it must have called forth earnest efforts to practise

the virtues of him whose place they occupied, him "who does not

favour princes, and makes no distinction between rich and poor, for

they are the work of his hands," Job xxxiv. 19, and it must have

awakened a holy fear of becoming liable to his judgment. For

there could be no doubt that as they judged in God's stead, the

heavenly Judge would not suffer them to go unpunished should

they misuse their office, but would in that case come forth from

his place and utter his thundering cry, "how long!" This last

idea is expressly brought forward in the law. In Deut. i. 17,

solemn admonitions are addressed to judges, grounded on the

lofty position assigned to their office. Comp. 2 Chron. xix. 6, 7,

where Jehosaphat, with greater copiousness of detail, addresses

the following admonitions to the judges, whom he commission-

ed:  "Take heed what ye do, for ye judge not for man but

for God, who is with you in the judgment: wherefore now let the

fear of the Lord be upon you, take heed and do it, for there is

no iniquity with the Lord our God, nor respect of persons, nor  

taking of gifts."

            The Psalm has no reference to the depth of human sinfulness

except in so far as the judges lost sight of the above view, set

before their minds rather the rights than the duties of their

exalted station, and abused for the gratification of their pride

what should have produced in them fear and trembling. The

name Elohim, which should have continually reminded them of

their heavenly Judge, served them as a shield for their own un-

righteousness. They held it up in the face of all complaints and

objections. Every man who did not go in with their unrighteous-

ness, they branded as a rebel against God. The Psalmist raises

his protest against this melancholy perversity. He shows the

wicked judges what it was that they really had to do with the

title Elohim. Asaph the seer lets them see, what the eye of


                              PSALM LXXXII.                                     33

 

flesh did not see, God, God among the gods, and brings him out

to their dismay from his place of concealment.

            There is a deviation so far from the language of the law of

Moses, that there the name Elohim is applied only in general to

the bench of judges as representing God, and here in the expression,

"in the midst of the gods he judges," it is applied to individual

judges. This difference, however, which has frequently been

misused in favour of completely untenable expositions, is so far

from being of any importance, that even in the Pentateuch an

individual person, although not a judge, if representing God,

is dignified with the name Elohim. Moses, in Ex. iv. 16, as the re-

presentative of God for Aaron, is called his god; and in like manner

a god to Pharaoh, ch. vii. 1: comp. Baumgarten on the passages.

Luther, after giving a picture of the wickedness and profligacy

of the great men of his time, remarks:--"There existed also among

the Jewish people youths of this character, who kept, continually in

their mouths the saying of Moses in Ex. xxii. 9. They employed

this saying as a cloak and shield for their wickedness, against the

preachers and the prophets; and gave themselves great airs

while they said: wilt thou punish us and instruct us? Dost thou

not know that Moses calls us Gods?  Thou art a rebel, thou

speakest against the ordinance of God, thou preachest to the

detriment of our honour. Now the prophet acknowledges and

does not deny that they are gods, he will not be rebellious, or

weaken their honour or authority, like the disobedient and re-

bellious people, or like the mad saints who make heretics and

enthusiasts, but he draws a proper distinction between their

power and the power of God. He allows that they are gods over

men, but not over God himself. It is as if he said:  It is true

you are gods over us all, but not over him who is the God of us

all. From this we see in what a high and glorious position God

intends to maintain the office of the magistracy. For who will

set himself against those on whom God bestows his own name?

Whoever despises them, despises at the same time the true

Magistrate, God, who speaks and judges in them and through

them, and calls their judgment his judgment. The Apostle Paul,

Rom. xiii. 2, points out the consequences of this; and experience

amply confirms his statement. But again; just as on the one

hand he restrains the discontent of the populace, and brings


34                      THE BOOK OF PSALMS.

 

them on account of it under the sword and under law, so does he

on the other hand restrain the magistracy, that it shall not abuse

such majesty and power for wickedness, but employ it in the pro-

motion and maintenance of peace. But yet only so far, that he will

not permit the people to lift up their arm against it, or to seize

the sword for the purpose of punishing and judging it. No, that

they shall not do; God has not commanded it. He himself,

God; will punish wicked magistrates, he will be judge and master

over them, he will get at them, better than any one else could,

as he has done from the beginning of the world."

            Ver. 1-4.—Ver. 1. A Psalm of Asaph. God stands in the

congregation of God, in the midst of the gods he judges. Ver. 2.

"How long will ye judge unjustly, and accept the persons of

the wicked? Selah. Ver. 3. Judge the poor and the fatherless,

give their rights to the poor and needy. Ver. 4. Deliver the

poor and the needy, rid them out of the hand of the wicked."—

The fiftieth Psalm, which was also composed, by Asaph, begins,

like the one now before us, with an appearance of God for judg-

ment. The name Elohim, not Jehovah, designedly occurs in the

first clause of ver. 1, because the judges also had been designated

by this name:  God judges the gods.  The bcn is, "he is placed,"

he comes forward," as in Is. iii. 13. The sphere of the judging

is described in general terms in the first clause, and is more par-

ticularly defined in the second. The general description refers to

the ground of this special judging act on the part of God because

Israel is his people, among whom he can suffer no unrighteous-

riess, no abuse of an office which bears his name, he must judge

his degenerate office-bearers.a  hvhy tdf, the congregation,

of Jehovah, in lxrWy tdf, the congregation of Israel (for ex-

ample Ps. lxxiv. 2), hdfh, the congregation, are standing ex-

pressions for the people of God. The Psalmist places lx in-

stead of the Jehovah of the first expression, for the sake of the

allusion to the second, and also because lx is more allied to

Myhlx.  Several deny the reference to Israel, and translate

 

            a Luther: He stands in his congregation, for the congregation is his own. This is a

terrible word of threatening against these wicked gods or magistrates. For they must

here understand that they are not placed overstocks and stones, nor over swine and dogs,

but over the congregation of God: they must therefore be afraid of acting against God

himself when they act unjustly.


                        PSALM LXXXII. VER. 1-4.                    35

 

either: in the assembly of God, the assembly which God ap-

points, or that over which he presides, or: in the divine college

of judges. But hdf never signifies an assembly or a college,

but always a community, a congregation. By Elohim several

would understand the sons of God, the angels: God holds a

judgment (upon the judges) in the midst of his heavenly court.

But in this way the fundamental thought of the Psalm which

seems placed at its head in marked antithetic expressions, God

judges the Gods, is destroyed; Elohim is never used for angels,

(comp. at Ps. viii. 5, Gesen. on the word), and there is no reason

why it should be so used here, the same appellation applied to

God and to the angels manifestly leading to confusion; it is

impossible to tell in this case who is judged, or to whom the

address in ver. 4-6 is directed; and finally, ver. 6, where the

judges are called gods, cannot possibly be separated from the,

words "in the midst of the gods." The judging refers, in the

first instance, to the sharp accusation of ver. 2-4. Still in these  

cases where this is not attended to,a it is completed in the defi-

nite sentence of death contained in ver. 6 and 7.—Ver. 2 de-

pends on Lev. xix. 15: Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judg-

ment, thou shalt not respect the person of the poor, nor honour

the person of the mighty, but in righteousness shalt thou judge

thy neighbour: comp. Deut. i. 17: Ye shall not respect persons

in judgment. The lf stands here in some measure as an ad-

verb, exactly as Myrwym in Ps. lviii. 1: comp. at the passage.

Gesenius in his Thesaurus has proved, in a thorough discussion

which in fact exhausts the subject, that the phrase Mynp xWn  

signifies, not "to lift up the face of any one,"  “to make him

lift it up,” but "to regard the face of any one," "to respect his

person," "to be inclined towards him," "to favour him."  The

Selah standing here, as in Ps. iv. 4, between the prohibition and

the command, leaves time to lay the first to heart.—The judging

in ver. 3 denotes the opposite of not taking up their case, of

sending them away unheard: comp. Is. i. 17: judge the father-

less, plead for the widow.  The poor,—comp. Ex. xxiii. 3. The

fatherless,--comp. Ex. xxii. 21. Luther "Every prince should,

 

            a Mich.: Such is the great benignity and patience of the supreme Judge; that before

pronouncing sentence he addresses to the criminals before his bar a serious admonition,

with a view of bringing them, if possible, to a sound state of mind.


36                     THE BOOK OF PSALMS.

 

get these three verses, yea the whole Psalm, painted upon the

walls of his room, upon his bed, over his table, and even upon

his clothes. For here they will find what high, princely, noble

virtue their situation demands; so that assuredly worldly supre-

macy, next to the office of the ministry, is the highest service of

God, and the most profitable duty upon earth."

            Ver. 5-7.—Ver. 5. They know not and understand not, in

darkness they walk on, all the foundations of the earth are

shaken. Ver. 6. I have said: Ye are gods and sons of the

Most High all of you. Ver. 7. But ye shall die like men, and

fall like one of the princes.—At ver. 5 we must supply: "as

they have hitherto done; the divine reprehension and punish-

ment have produced no good effects." As God continues to

speak in ver. 6 and 7, we must conceive of this complaint in re-

gard to the inefficacy of what he had hitherto announced, as pro-

ceeding from him. At "they know not and understand not,"

we are to supply the object from the context, as in all similar

cases (comp. at Ps. xiv. 3), viz., the sacred duties of their office,

which had been inculcated upon them in ver. 2-4. Comp.

Mich. iii. 1. "is it for you to know judgment?" The darkness

indicates moral bewilderment, comp. Prov. ii. 13:  "They forsake

the ways of uprightness, and walk in the ways of darkness."  At

the last clause we are by no means to supply therefore: the

clause stands in the same relation as the other clauses to the

criminality of the judges: every thing is ruined by them,—they

ruin every thing. There is an implied comparison: every thing

in the land is tossed upside down as in an earthquake. It is

only in the comparison, and not in the reality, that the reference

to the earth lies.—In the final judgment pronounced by God,

ver. 6 and 7, the elevated station of judges is first acknowledged,

on which they grounded their assertion that they were invested

with absolute power, ver. 4, and then it is affirmed that this

station by no means frees them from responsibility, or affords

them any protection against that merited punishment which was

just about immediately to befal them. The but in ver. 7 sup-

poses an indeed understood in ver. 6.a I have said refers to cer-

 

            a Calvin: A concession in which the prophet spews the wicked judges, that they will

derive no protection from that sacred character with which God has invested them. I

acknowledge that you are God, &c.


                           PSALM LXXXII. VER. 5-7.                        37

 

tain generally well-known expressions in which the magistracy,

and in particular the judicial office, is designated by the name

Elohim,—the passages already quoted of the Mosaic law. The

Elohim might here in itself be taken in the singular: ye are God,

bearers of his image, as Gousset and others expound. But ver. 1

renders it necessary to translate:  ye are gods. Our Saviour in-

terprets the passage in this way in Jo. x. 35. Along with the

fundamental passages to which it refers, and on which it certainly

forms an advance, in so far as the name Elohim is applied to

individuals, the passage before us is strikingly adapted to

give a blow to that rigid dualism of God and man, in which the

Pharasaic opposition to the God-man is rooted: The second ap-

pellation, "Sons of the Highest," indicates the intimate character

of the relation in which earthly judges stand to the Judge in

heaven. It was shewn at Ps. ii. 7, that it is in this sense that

the sonship of God is spoken of every where throughout the Old

Testament. Luther:  "It may well make one wonder that he

calls such wicked individuals as those whom he here rebukes so

sharply, by the name of sons of God or sons of the Highest, since

children of God is an appellation which in Scripture is applied to

holy believers. Answer:  it is just as great a wonder that he

should bestow upon such wicked people his own name; yea, it is

rather a greater wonder that he should call them gods. But it all

lies in the word: I have said. For we have often remarked that

the word of God sanctifies and deifies all things to which it is

applied. Wherefore we may call such situations as have had im-

pressed upon them the word of God, in every respect holy divine

conditions, although the persons are not holy. Just as father,

mother, preacher, minister, &c., are in every respect holy divine

situations, although the persons who are in them may be knaves

and rogues. Thus inasmuch as God stamps the office of magistry

with his word, magistrates are correctly called gods, and the chil-

dren of God, on account of their divine condition, and the word of

God, although they are really vile knaves, as he complains that they

are."—The 7th verse does not at all refer in general to mortality

and death—a reference which acquired proper force and significance

only in New Testament times, when "and after that the judg-

ment," was brought clearly out as standing in immediate con-

nection. The idea meant to be conveyed is, in accordance with


38                      THE BOOK OF PSALMS.

 

the Old Testament practice throughout, and especially that of

the Psalms in similar cases, a threatening of violent death, of a

cutting off in the midst of the days: comp. the heathen saying:

ad generum Cereris sine caede et sanguine pauci descendant reges

et sicca morte tyranni. This is evident from "ye shall fall" of

the second clause (lpn is always used of a violent death, Ps.

xci. 7; Ex. xix. 21; Jer. viii. 12, and in the full form, "to fall

by the sword," in Jer. xxxix. 18, and in other passages), by

which the general expression of the first clause, "ye shall die,"

which is accompanied only by the words "like men," is rendered

definite. The expression, "like men," "after the manner of

men" (comp. at Ps. xvii.), intimates to the gods of the earth,

who fancied themselves to be above all other men, that as far as

death is concerned, they are subject to the general lot of hu-

manity. The expression, "as one of the princes" (comp. 1 Kings

xxii. 13; xix. 2. Obed. ver. 11), reminds them of the numerous

examples in early times of similar dignitaries who were removed

by the judgment of God. The connection shews that it is fallen

princes that are meant. Any further reference (several exposi-

tors suppose that heathen princes are meant, who are not even 

once particularly alluded to, others warriors,—not to speak of

still more arbitrary ideas) is altogether unknown to the context,

is in no respect called for, and indeed is of no use whatever.

            The prophetic denunciation of the judgment of God is followed,

in ver. 8, by an expression of earnest desire for its accomplish-

ment.--Lift up thyself, 0 God, judge the earth, for thou art

Lord over all the nations.—The wish of the Psalmist, or of the

church, in whose name he speaks, refers, in the first instance, to

Israel; yet, as the special exercise of judgment on the part of

God is only an instance of what is general, the Psalmist calls

upon him to appear to judge the world: comp. at Ps. vii. 7,

8; lvi. 7; lix. 5.  The Lord appears also, in the parallel pas-

sage, Is. iii. 13, to judge the nations. The call made upon God

to judge the earth is based upon the fact, that all its nations are

subject to him, and responsible to him, no less than Israel, the

peculiar hlHn of the Lord, and, therefore, the immediate object

of his judgment.  lHn, with the accusative is, "to possess," and

with b "to have a possession:" comp. Num. xviii. 20; Deut.

xix. 14; Num. xxxiv. 29. (Böttcher is wrong, Proben. p. 184.)


                             PSALM LXXXIII.                                   39

 

 

                             PSALM LXXXIII.

 

            The short prayer that God would help, ver. 1, is followed, in

ver. 2-8, by a representation of the trouble which occasions the

prayer: first, in ver. 2-4, the doings of the enemies,--they roar,

they take crafty counsel, they aim at nothing less than the entire

destruction of Israel—second, their number, in ver. 5-8,—no

fewer than ten nations assembled around Ammon and Moab as

the centre-point, are united against Israel. The representation

of the distress is followed, in ver. 9-18, by the developed

prayer. This prayer first reminds God of the wonderful assist-

ance which, in similar circumstances, he had vouchsafed to

his people in the days of old, ver. 9-12; next it calls upon  

him to let loose the storm and the tempest of his wrath upon the

enemies, ver. 13-15, and finally, by the destruction of the ene-

mies, to promote his own glory upon the earth, ver. 16-18.

            The formal arrangement admits of being ascertained with ease

and certainty. If we cut off the title and the preliminary prayer

in. ver. 1 which in reality belongs to it, we have two main divi-

sions, which are also externally separated by the Selah, viz., the

representation of the trouble, ver. 2-8, and the prayer, ver. 9-16.

The seven of the first is divided into a three and a four, the qua-

lity of the enemies, and their quantity; the ten of the second by

a seven, which again falls into a four and a three (the reversed

relation of the three and the four of the first half) and a three.

The ten hostile nations, in ver. 5-7, correspond to the number

ten of the verses of the second half: there are as many verses of

petitions as there are enemies; while the number of individual peti-

tions of this half is complete in twelve, the signature of the peo-

ple of the covenant. This number ten of the nations is divided

exactly in the same way as the verses: 4, 3, 3. In like manner,

the number seven of the names of the enemies of the times of

old, who were annihilated by the omnipotence of God, at the be-

ginning of the second part, ver. 9-11, corresponds to the num-

ber seven of the verses of the first half, which speaks of the rage

and the crowd of the enemies. Accident here cannot possibly

exist.

            There is no room for doubt as to the historical occasion of the


40                       THE BOOK OF PSALMS.

 

Psalm. It refers to the war of Jehosaphat against the allied

Edomites, Moabites, Ammonites, and other nations, and forms

the earliest as to subject of a series of cognate Psalms. While it

makes mention of the help of God in the midst of danger, the forty-

seventh Psalm was sung, after the discomfiture of the enemy, on

the field of battle, and the forty-eighth at the thanksgiving service

in the temple. The following reasons may be urged in favour of this

view--a view which has been taken by all commentators, except

those who have been prevented from arriving at the truth by

some prejudice, such as that all the Psalms of Asaph were com-

posed in David's time, or that the narrative at 2 Chron. xx. is

not historically correct. 1. Here, as on that occasion, it is the

same nations, upon the whole, that meet us. The Edomites, the

Moabites, and the Ammonites, whom alone the author of Chro-

nicles expressly names, are not only mentioned in this Psalm, but  

are also introduced as those with whom the whole enterprise ori-

ginated. The others are grouped around these three; and at the

conclusion, the sons of Lot are expressly named as the instigators.

Even the narrative in Chronicles decidedly indicated that these

three were named merely as the centre of the undertaking, and

that there were others concerned of less note, the mention of

whom was not a matter of such consequence to the historian as

it was to the Psalmist whose object was promoted by a heaping

up of names. Not to mention that, according to Chronicles, the

enemy formed such a mass that Israel had no strength to resist

them, that the quantity of plunder indicated an enemy from a far

country, who had set out, bag and baggage, it is expressly said,

in ver. 1, "and with them others who dwelt remote from the

Ammonites, beyond them," (comp. on Mynvmfhm Cler. and the

annot.), and in ver. 2, "and they told Jehosaphat saying, There

cometh a great multitude against thee from beyond the sea, be-

yond Aram" (not out of Aram, for there is no copula), out of

the country east of that stripe which is bounded on the north by

Syria, and on the south by the Dead Sea, therefore, from the de-

serts of Arabia, whose hordes had in former times made Palestine

the object of their marauding assaults. 2. The union and con-

federacy of all the nations mentioned, ver. 3 and 5, is of great

consequence. Such a confederacy of nations took place only at

one period during the whole history, viz., in the time of Jehosa-


                             PSALM LXXXIII.                                      41

 

phat. The remark of Koester, who finds it necessary to consider

the confederacy of the nations as not a historical event, "they

plunder us as if they had preconcerted a plan," shows to what

arbitrary expedient those are obliged to have recourse who do

not adopt the reference to this transaction. 3. According to ver.

4, the enemies kept their plans secret, and employed cunning

preparatory to force. It is exactly in accordance with this, that,

from 2 Chron. xx. 2, it appears that Jehosaphat obtained intelli-

gence of the undertaking of his enemies for the first time, when

they were already within his dominions, at Engedi: they could

not possibly have made their hostile preparations with greater

cunning and silence. The place, also, at which the enemies made

their entrance, leads to the same result. Their marching south-

ward so as to go round the Dead Sea, while they might have

quietly entered Canaan from the east, as Israel did in former

times, could only have been adopted for the purpose of concealing

their object. 5. According to ver. 4 and 12, the enemies had

nothing less for their object than to do to Israel what Israel had

formerly done to the Canaanites. It was no ordinary marauding

expedition;—the intention was completely to root out Israel,

and to take entire possession of his lands. The enemies of Jeho-

saphat, according to 2 Chron. xx. 11, had the same object in

view. That they had so is obvious from the quality of the booty

which was found in their tents. They had set out, as Israel did

of old, with bag and baggage. 5. The mention of the Amalekites

among the enemies of Israel, in ver. 7, renders it impossible to

come down to times later than that of Jehosaphat. The last re-

mains of the Amalekites were, according to 1 Chron. iv. 43, rooted

out by the Simeonites, under Hezekiah. From that time, they

disappear altogether from history. Ewald's assertion that Ama-

lek stands here "only as a name of infamy applied to parties

well-known at the time," is to be considered as a miserable shift.

6. The Psalm must have been composed previous to the exten-

sion of the empire of the Assyrians over Western Asia. For the

Assyrians named last, in the 8th verse, appear here in the very

extraordinary character of an ally of the Sons of Lot. 7. Our

Psalm, according to the title, was composed by Asaph. In ac-

cordance with this, we read, in 1 Chron. xx. 14, that the Spirit

of the Lord came upon Jehasiel, of the sons of Asaph, in the


42                    THE BOOK OF PSALMS.

 

midst of the assembly. This Jehasiel is probably the author of

the Psalm. 8. Our Psalm is a true picture of the state of feel-

ing which prevailed throughout the people during the danger

under Jehosaphat. According to the history of Chronicles, they

praised God at that time, in the midst of their danger, with loud

voice, ver. 19; and here in the title, which is an appendage to

that of Ps. xlviii., the Psalm is called a song of praise (comp. on

ryw, at Ps. xlii. 9); and it is such in reality, although it bears

the form of a prayer,—a song of triumph sung before the vic-

tory,—no contest, no doubt, the distress is simply committed to

God.

            In establishing the correct view, we, at the same time, virtu-

ally refute those of an erroneous nature, whose very existence, as

well as that of the prejudice against the historical character of

2 Chron. xx.—a notion which even our Psalm, in common with

Ps. xlvii. and xlviii. (comp. Keil on 2 Chron. p. 241 ss.) is suffi-

cient to put to shame,—is to be accounted for by the extent to

which the abettors of the late origin of the Psalms have overshot

their mark. The hypothesis that the Psalm refers to the occur-

rence at Neh. iv. 1 ss. is negatived by this, among other reasons,

that it is scarcely possible to conceive anything less suitable to

it than these "railleries of the neighbours," who had no further

end in view than to hinder the building of the temple; and still

further by the consideration that the Samaritans, who were at

that time the chief enemies, would not have been wanting, and

that the Amalekites and the Assyrians would not have been

mentioned. That the Persians are meant by the Assyrians is

again a miserable subterfuge. In a case where nine nations are

spoken of by their proper names, the tenth must be referred to

in the same way: that the Persians took any part in that ma-

chination is a groundless assertion; even had they done so, they

would not have occupied such a subordinate place as is here as-

signed to the Assyrians.—The assertion first made by v. Til, and

subsequently repeated by Hitzig, that the Psalm refers to the

incidents of 1 Macc. v. is negatived by the following considera-

tions:—At that time, there was no combination among the

neighbouring nations; each acted by itself: these nations at that

time did not set out for the purpose of extirpating the Jews ge-

nerally; they only rose up against those who were dwelling in


                           PSALM LXXXIII. VER. 2-4.                           43

 

the midst of them: there is no passage where the Syrians are

designated by the name of Assyrians; they never were, like the

Chaldeans and the Persians, the successors of the Assyrians in

the dominion of Asia: the Syrians took no part in that conflict:

the mention of Endor as the place of the discomfiture of the

Canaanites, at ver. 10, shows that the Psalm must have been

composed at a time when, in reference to the period of the Judges,

there were other sources of information at hand than those which

now exist. It is, therefore, not at all necessary to have recourse

to those general grounds which are conclusive against the exist-

ence of Maccabean Psalms. The incidents, however, recorded in

Neh. iv. and 1 Macc. v. are of importance so far, that they show 

how intense and permanent was the hatred of the neighbouring

nations against "the people of God," and, consequently, go far

to confirm the credibility of 2 Chron. xx., and the historical cha-

racter of ver. 2-8 of our Psalm.

            Amyraldus:  "The Psalm may be applied now to the enemies

of the Christian Church, of which Israel was the type. The most

important and formidable of these are assuredly sin and Satan,

from whom we most especially long to be delivered."

            Title: A Song of praise, a Psalm of Asaph. Ver. 1. 0 God,

keep not silence, be not dumb, and be not still, 0 God.—That

ymd signifies not rest, but silence, is evident from "thine enemies

make a noise;" in ver. 2, and from the following word, wrHt,

comp. at Ps. xxviii. 1. The word also signifies to be silent, in

Is. lxii. 7, as is evident from the 6th verse.

            Ver. 2-4.—Ver. 2. For lo, thine enemies make a noise, and

those who hate thee lift up the head. Ver. 3. They make cun-

ning plots against thy people, and consult against thy concealed

ones. Ver. 4. They say: come let us root them out; so that

they shall not be a people, and that mention be no more made

of the name of Israel.—On ver. 2. Calvin:  "It is to be re-

marked that those who attack the church are called enemies of

God, and it is no ordinary ground of confidence to have enemies,

in common with God." They lift up the head,—proudly, boldly,

confidently; comp. Judges viii. 28, “And Midian was humbled

by the children of Israel, and did not any more lift up its head.”

—In the first clause of ver. 3, the translation generally given is:

they make artfully the plots in the councils. But as Myrfh in


44                      THE BOOK OF PSALMS.

 

other passages means to act cunningly, and dvs does not exactly

indicate counsel or deliberation; it is better to consider dvs  

as standing in the accusative, just as bl does in ver. 5, and

jmw in ver. 18, comp. Evr. § 483: in reference to confidence

comp. at Ps. lxiv. 2, confidential intercourse which they carry on.

The expression, "the hidden ones of God," instead of "those

under his protection," is explained by Ps. xxvii. 5; xxxi. 21.—

On ver. 4, Calvin: "it is as if they had formed the daring pur-

pose of annulling the decree of God in which the eternal exist-

ence of the church lies founded." The yvgm is away from a peo-

ple,---so that they shall be no more a people: comp. Jer. xlviii.

2; Is. vii. 8.—There are five terms employed in these three

verses, descriptive of the doings of the enemies. The number

five as the signature of the half, of something unfinished, points

to the second half strophe, which is occupied with enumerating

the enemies.

            Ver. 5-8.—Ver. 5. For they have consulted from the heart

together, they have formed a covenant against thee. Ver. 6.

The tents of Edom and of the Ishmaelites, Moab and the Haga-

rites. Ver. 7. Gebal, and Ammon,  and Amalek; Philistia

with the inhabitants of Tyre. Ver. 8. Even Assyria has joined

them; they stretch out their arm to the Sons of Lot. Selah.

Calvin:  "It is not a little profitable for us to see in this case, as

in a glass, what, from the beginning, has been the experience of

the Church of God, so that we need not be frightened too much

when the whole world is against us. When we see that nothing

new befals us, we are strengthened in patience by the example of

the church of old, until God suddenly put forth his power, which

alone is sufficient to subvert all the machinations of the world."

Several expositors erroneously connect the 5th verse with what

goes before—a flat and insipid rendering. The yk indicates a

more full exhibition of the relations alluded to in the preceding

verses; and it is not co-ordinate with the yk in ver. 2. The bl  

stands like the dvs in ver. 3, and the dmw in ver. 18, in the

accusative. The expression "with the heart" supplies a commen-

tary to Ps. lxiv. 5,6, and denotes the earnestness and zeal of their

plans; the heart, with the whole fulness of its purposes, plans,

and wickedness, is engaged in the matter. Several expositors

refer erroneously to dHx bl with one heart, in 1 Chron. xii.


                      PSALM LXXXIII. VER. 5-8.                              45

 

38.—In enumerating the nations, the first seven are grouped to-

gether in such a manner that we find associated with the ring-

leaders, who are Edom, Moab, and Ammon, those nations who had

been pressed into the service by them,—so that these three names

should be looked upon as if printed in large characters. That the

arrangement is to be explained in this way is evident from the

otherwise inexplicable separation of Moab from Ammon. As

the Edomites were not a wandering but a settled people, we

must either understand by "tents" camp-tents, or "tents" is to

be considered as a poetical expression for habitations, founded on

the dwelling of the Israelites in the wilderness: comp. Jud. vii.

8; 1 Kings xii. 16. The Edomites, who are associated with the

Ishmaelites, dwelt, according to Gen. xxv. 18, next to the Assy-

rians, and therefore, in the desert of Arabia. The attendants of

Moab, the Hagarites, were a wandering Arabic tribe, to the east

of Jordan, which, in the time of Saul, was dispossessed of its coun-

try by the tribe of Reuben: comp. 1 Chron. v. 10, 19-22. They

removed, in all probability, farther south, into that part of Ara-

bia which adjoins Moab; and they were, therefore, their natural

allies in this league. On the right side of Ammon there was

Gebal, in all probability an Idumean district, and on the left,

Amalek, who appears here, as on a former occasion, Judges iii.

13, in a state of alliance with him: “and he (Eglon, the king of

Moab) assembled around .him the sons of Ammon and Amalek.”

To the seven nations, who formed the main body, there are

added other three. First, the Philistines, who are not, indeed,

expressly named in Chronicles, but concerning whom it is taken

for granted, that those who always embraced the opportunity of

a war raised against the Israelites by other nations, would not

lose this opportunity of gratifying their deep-seated hatred. The

inhabitants of Tyre appear only as following in the train of the

Philistines. The merchants were induced merely by cupidity to

join in this movement, as the tradesmen of Tarsus did in Ez.

xxxviii. 13.  They are universally to be found wherever there is

any thing to be earned. In Amos, also, i. 6-10, the Philistines

and the Tyrians appear in compact with each other, and with the

Edomites, in their purposes of hostility towards the  Israelites;

and the passage in Joel iv. 4, &c., shows how natural is this ad-

dition of the Tyrians to the Philistines, where we find it repre-


46                      THE BOOK OF PSALMS.

 

sented in prophetic vision that the Philistines, along with the

Tyrians and Sidonians, avail themselves of the opportunity of a

war raised against Israel by other nations to gratify their hatred

and their cupidity.—The Assyrians are mentioned last, being at

the greatest distance, and engaged only indirectly and partially

in the enterprise. According to Gen. xxv. 18, they were the

neighbours of the Arabian sons of the desert, yea, according to

Gen xxv. 3, they had Arabic elements in the midst of themselves,

so that it is, therefore, antecedently probable that they should be

found taking part in this great movement of the Arabic tribes.

The Assyrians finally, as the associates from the most remote

east, stand opposed to the Philistines and the Tyrians from the

west. The seven wicked nations are bounded by these on the east

and the west. Last of all, the sons of Lot are mentioned as the pro-

per instigators and fire-brands of the war. The subject in "they

stretch" is not the singular Assyrian, but all the nations which

had been named, with the self-evident exception of the sons of

Lot themselves. It is only by adopting this view, which, indeed,

is the most obvious one, as far as the language is concerned, that

this conclusion receives its proper significance.a

            Ver. 9-12.—Ver. 9. Do to them as to Midian, as to Sisera,

as to Jabin, in the valley of Kison. Ver; 10. Who were de-

stroyed at Endor, they were dung for the land. Ver. 11. Make

them, their nobles, as Oreb and as Seeb, all their princes as

Sebah and Zalmuna. Ver. 12. Who said: we will possess

ourselves of the habitations of God.—Calvin: "The substance

is, may God who has so often smitten his enemies, and delivered

his timorous sheep out of the jaws of wolves, not leave them at

this time unprotected against these forces." From the many

examples of divine judgment upon the enemies, which constituted

pledges of deliverance in this trouble, the Psalmist selects two,

the victory over the Canaanites from Judges iv. and v., and the

victory of Gideon over the Midianites from Judges vii. and viii.

He begins with the latter as the more glorious of the two. But

in expanding the general subject of the 9th verse, in ver. 10 and

11, the order is reversed. Ver. 10 is an appendage to the second

clause; ver. 11 expands the first. "Do to them as to Midian"

 

            a Venema: Finally, having enumerated the nations in order, the Psalmist adds who

were the authors of the war and who allies.


                      PSALM LXXXIII. VER. 13-15.                            47

 

(instead of "as thou didst to Midian,"—the comparison being, as

is frequently the case, merely referred to, not drawn out, comp.

Ew. 527) was fulfilled beyond what they asked or thought:

the discomfiture of the enemies, as was the case with the Midian-

ites, took place by mutual destruction,--a means which has often

proved of signal service to the kingdom of God: comp. 2 Chron.

xx. 22, 23, with Judges vii. 22. The glorious victory over

Midian appears also in Is. ix. 4, and Hab. iii. 7, as the emblem

and pledge of glorious deliverances yet to come. The effort to

exhibit the individuals named, standing as much apart as pos-

sible, "as Sisera, as Jabin," not "and Jabin," is explained by

the reference to the seven nations. On "in the valley of Kison,"

comp. Judges iv. 7, 13; v. 21.—Endor ver. 10 (comp. Robin-

son, vol. iii. 468. 77), which appears here as the proper place of

the discomfiture of the Canaanites, is not expressly named in the

book of Judges. In the second clause there is an abbreviated

comparison, as is obvious from the other passages where this

same comparison occurs, drawn out, for example, 2 Kings ix. 37,

"and the carcase of Jezebel shall be as thing upon the face of

the field," Jer. ix. 21. Is. v. 25.—The "their nobles" In ver. 11,

is expository of "them." Oreb and Seeb were, according to

Judges vii. 25; the commanders of the Midianites, Sebah and

Zalmunah, Judges viii. 5-10; xii. 18-21, their kings.—Ver. 12

points once more to the guilt of the enemies which made them

worthy of a destruction similar to that which befel those of an

earlier period. Elohim (not Jehovah) is selected for the purpose

of making more distinct the criminality of the attempt. By the

"habitations of God" is meant the whole land of Canaan: comp.

2 Chron, xx. 11, "they have come to cast us out of thy posses-

sion which thou hast given us to inherit," Ps. xlvii. 4.

            Ver. 13-15.—Ver. 13. My God, make them like the whirl,

like the stubble before the wind. Ver. 14. As fire which burns

up the forest, as flame which scorches the hills:  Ver. 15. Do

thou thus pursue them with thy tempest, and terrify them

with thy storm.a—The "like the whirl (comp. at Ps. lxxvii.

 

            a Venema: Having placed before our eyes the judgment of God upon the enemies, as

illustrated by the example of antiquity, he now describes it in a sublimer style, with

images drawn from wind, storm, and fire, and (ver 16-18) exhibits the scope and effect

of these judgments, in order that men, overwhelmed with shame, may learn to reverence

the majesty of Jehovah.


48                    THE BOOK OF PSALMS.

 

18), like the stubble," in ver. 13, is equivalent to "like

the stubble which is, whirled round and carried off:" comp. Is.

xvii. 13, a passage which depends on the verse before us.—As

fire, ver. 14, as destructively. The hills are mentioned, as

is obvious from the parallel clause, in reference to what covers

them.

            Ver. 16-18.--Ver. 16. Fill their faces with shame, and may

they seek thy name, 0 Lord. Ver 17. Let them be put to shame

and terrified for ever, and blush and perish. Ver. 18. And may

they know that thou with thy name, 0 Lord, art above the most

high over the whole earth.—The object aimed at is intimated

in the words: may they seek thy name, and may they know thy

name. "Fill their face with shame" serves as the basis of the

first, and the contents of ver. 18, of the second: we can never

be more confident of the destruction of our enemies, and of our

own deliverance, than when these tend to promote the exaltation

and the glory of God. In point of form, however, the second

clause of ver. 16 is independent of, and co-ordinate with the first:

—not: that they may seek. Otherwise, we destroy the number

of petitions, twelve in all, seven in this paragraph, corresponding

to the number seven of the verses of the preceding paragraph.—

On "their faces," ver. 16, comp. Ps. lxix. 7. "Thy name" is

equivalent to "thee, rich in deeds, glorious." "May they seek

thee" (Berleb: as humble suppliants) has no reference to "con-

version," but to the forced subjection of those who, like Pharaoh,

are not able to hold out any longer against the inflictions of God.

This is evident, also, from the following verse, where the Psalmist

prays for the destruction of the enemies.a  It would be the height

of folly to hope for the conversion of such enemies.—In the 18th

verse, the acknowledgment is not a voluntary but a forced ac-

knowledgment: comp. Ps. lix. 13; 1 Sam. xvii. 46. The jmw,

is the accus., just as the bl in ver, 5, and the dvs in ver. 3, "as

 

            a Calvin: "It is, I acknowledge, the first step towards repentance, when men, humbled

by chastisements, yield of their own accord; but the prophet adverts merely to a forced

and servile submission. For it often happens that the wicked, subdued by sufferings,

give glory to God for a time. But because in a short while they exhibit a frantic rage,

their hypocrisy is thus sufficiently exposed, and the ferocity which lay concealed in their

hearts becomes apparent. He wishes, therefore, that the wicked may be compelled reluc-

tautly to acknowledge God: that at least their fury, at present breaking forth with im-

punity, may be kept under restraint and within due bounds.


                                PSALM LXXXIV.                              49

 

to thy name," i. e., "for the sake of thy name:" thou who

rich in deeds, glorious. The name, the product of the deeds, is

what belongs to the Lord, above all others who are called lords

and gods these are all nameless; the names which they bear

are mere names, shells without kernel. That we are not to give

the first half of the verse a sense complete in itself—and know

that thou alone hast the name Jehovah—is evident from the

parallel and in all probability dependant passage, Is. xxxvii. 16,

where Hezekiah says:  Jehovah, Sabbaoth, God of Israel, thou

art God Ha-elohim, alone for all the kingdoms of the earth,

2 Kings xix. 19.a  The Eljou is the predicate here just as Elo-

him is there.

 

 

                                  PSALM LXXXIV.

 

            The Psalmist pronounces himself happy in the possession of the

highest of all blessings, that of dwelling in the house of God, and

that of communion with him; for inheritance follows adoption:

to those who participate in this blessing, the Lord will by his

salvation yet give occasion to praise him, ver. 1-4. He pronounces

those happy (salvation to himself because he belongs to their

number) who place their trust in God, and walk blamelessly: for

their misery, shall be turned into salvation, and the end of their

way is praise and thanks, ver. 5-7. The prayer rises on the

basis of the meditation; may God be gracious to his anointed,

for his favour is the highest good, whoever possesses it is sure of

salvation, ver. 8-12.

            The whole Psalm contains 12 verses. It is divided into two

strophes; one of meditation, in seven verses, and the other of

prayer, in five. The seven is divided into four and three: sal-

vation as the necessary consequence of dwelling in the house of

the Lord, and salvation: as the consequence of piety and blame-

lessness. The five which points out the second strophe as sup-

plementary to the first is divided into an introduction and, a con-

clusion, each of one verse, and a main body of three verses.

The Selah stands where it is most necessary, at the end of the

 

            a Is. xxxvii. 20 is to be supplemented from both these passages: and all the kingdoms

of the earth may experience that thou; 0 Lord, alone (art God).


50                           THE BOOK OF PSALMS.

 

first part of the first strophe, and at the end of the introduction

of the prayer-strophe. It is here that the parts, which ought

to be kept separate, admit most easily of being read together.

The name Jehovah occurs three times in the first and three times

in the second strophe. Sabbaoth is added twice in each. If we

add to the six repetitions of Jehovah the four repetitions of Elo-

him, which occurs generally in a subordinate position, so that

Jehovah preponderates, we have altogether ten names of God.

The ninth verse renders it evident that the speaker is the

Anointed of the Lord: This fact an be reconciled with the

title, which ascribes the Psalm to the sons of Korah, only by

the supposition that it was sung from the soul of the Anointed:

comp. the Intro. to Ps. xl. and xliii., where the case is exactly

the same.

            The Psalm gives very slight intimation as to the situation of

the Anointed. That he was in a calamitous situation is obvious

from the whole tendency of the Psalm, which, is, manifestly de-

signed to pour consolation into the soul of the sufferer, and in

particular from "they shall still praise thee," in ver. 4, "going

through the valley of tears," in ver. 6, and the prayer in ver. 8

and 9, which is that of a sufferer standing in need of divine

assistance. It is intimated in ver. 7 that the sufferer particu-

larly is separated from the sanctuary.  Farther, the Anointed

stands in inward and near relation to the Lord, ver. 1-4; he is

one who has his strength in the Lord, and trusts in him, vers. 5

and 12, and who has walked blamelessly, vers. 5 and 11, yea he

stands as the teacher in Israel of these great virtues, ver. 6.

            These marks lead to David in his flight from Absalom; they

meet together as applicable no where else. This result obtained

from the consideration of the Psalm itself is confirmed by com-

paring it with Ps. xlii. and in which the traces of that

time, and the reference to these events, are still more apparent.

These Psalms are so closely allied to the one before us, that it

is impossible to consider them apart. They both bear a con-

siderable resemblance to it, even externally, as might be made

to appear,--Pss. xlii. and xliii. stand at the head of the Korahite

Elohim Psalms, and this Psalm at the head of the Korahite Je-

hovah Psalms, so that thus both are in a peculiarly close manner

connected together. And they possess the following points in

 

 


                                 PSALM LXXXIV.                                  51

 

common:—they were composed by the sons of Korah from the

soul of the Anointed; they are all characterized by an ardour of

feeling, and a tender pathos, which here, as is also indicated by

the title, assumes the form of a pathetic joy; in all, the Anointed

is in a state of suffering, and is separated from the sanctuary.

The fundamental thought also of this Psalm occurs in Ps. xlii. 6,

8, where the Psalmist obtains comfort in his misery, and the hope

of salvation because he becomes absorbed in a consciousness of

possessing the favour of God. As to particular expressions comp.

ver. 4 with Ps. xlii. 5, ver. 7 with Ps. xliii. 3, ver. 9 with Ps.

xliii. 5.a

            The sons of Korah perform here as in Ps. xliii. for David

in the time of Absalom, the same duty which David once per-

formed for Saul. They sang quietness and peace from their soul

to his, giving back to him a part of what they themselves had

ceived, from him the "teacher," ver. 6. They brought to his

recollection the foundations of his hope: the blessing of com-

munion with God yet remaining to him, which, as the fountain

all other blessings, must brighten his piety and his blameless

walk in the estimation of all who regard God, and finally his

suffering in joy.

            The contents are nearly allied to those of Ps. lxiii., which was

composed by David himself in the time of Absalom. There also

we find hope in reference to the future rising on the basis of in-

ward union with God enjoyed by the Psalmist at present.

            It has been maintained as an argument against the composi-

tion of the Psalm in the time of David, that the sanctuary in

per. 1, 2, 3, 10, must have been a temple, a large building. But

the mention of “habitations” of God, in ver. 1, does not imply

this; for even the tabernacle-temple was divided into several

apartments, and the habitations and sanctuaries of the Lord are

 

            a Even Ewald acknowledges that Ps. xlii., and Ps. lxxxiv., are inseparably con-

nected. "These Psalms are manifestly so similar, in colouring of language, in plan and

structure, in overflowing fulness of rare figures, finally, in refined delicacy and tender-

ness of thought, and yet every thing in both poems is so entirely original, while nothing

is the result of imitation from the other, that it is impossible to avoid coming to the con-

clusion that both are the product of the same poet." It is singular that with such ac- 

knowledgments and concessions the inference so necessarily flowing from them it

favour of the titles should be disregarded. How comes it that in the titles those

Psalms are attributed to the same authors which on internal grounds are so intimately

related, if these titles were composed upon mere conjecture?

 


 52                         THE BOOK OF PSALMS.

 

mentioned in other Psalms which manifestly belong to the times

of David, Ps. xliii. 3, lxviii. 35. The same cannot be said of

"courts " in ver. 2 and 10. The tabernacle, and therefore pro-

bably also the tent erected by David for the ark of the covenant

on Mount Zion, had certainly only one court. But in poetical

language we not infrequently find courts used in the sense of the

space before the sanctuary, where in reality there was only one

court. Thus, for example, in Ps. lxv. 4, which was composed by

David; again in Is: i. 12, "who hath required this of you that

ye tread my courts," Ps. xcii. 13, c. 4: the one of the two courts

of Solomon's temple was the court of the Priests, and it therefore

cannot be meant as included. Finally, it is only by adopting a

false rendering that ver. 3 can be considered as making any men-

tion of birds nests in the sanctuary; the same may be said of

ver. 5 ss., in regard to pilgrimages,—it is without any good rea-

soh, besides, that it has been said of these that they did not exist

in the time" of David. An intimation that the sanctuary at that

time existed in a tent, occurs in ver. 10. The reference to the

tabernacle-house of God undoubtedly called forth in that passage

the mention of the tents of wickedness, instead of its palaces:

            The Psalm has had the misfortune to be misunderstood in

various ways, particularly by the modern expositors whose per-

ception of its meaning is upon the whole much more profound

than was that of Luther. The main ground of the misunder-

standings is the falsely literal rendering of those passages in

which mention is made of the house of the Lord. It is from this

that has arisen the idea that there exists in the Psalm "an ex-

pression of earnest desire for the temple," in opposition to ver. 2,

where the Psalmist rejoices as one who already enjoys the privi-

lege of near access to God, to ver. 3, according to which the bird

has already found its house and the swallow its nest in the house

of God, and to ver. 10 in connection with to ver. 9, &c.

            On the title "to the chief Musician after the manner (or  ac-

cording to the harp, comp. at title of Ps. viii.) of Gath, by the

sons of Korah, a Psalm," Arnd remarks: The Gittith was a

spiritual musical instrument on which these Psalms were played,

which sounded pleasantly and joyfully. For the ancients did not

play all the Psalms upon the same instrument, but they varied

according to the strain of each Psalm. What should we learn


                           PSALM LXXXIV. VER. 1-4                        53

 

from this?  That our heart, mouth, and tongue, should be the true

spiritual musical instruments of God, the pleasant harps and the

good sounding symbols, both mournful and joyful instruments

according to the dispensation of God and the times." "To the

Chief Musician," shews that the Psalm was intended for some-

thing more than what immediately gave occasion to it, that along

with its individual application we must keep in view its applica-

tion for all the suffering people of God: comp. the Intro. at

Ps. xlii.

            Ver. 1-4.—Ver. 1. How beloved are thy dwelling-places, 0

Lord, (Lord) of Hosts. Ver. 2. My soul longeth and even

fainteth after the courts of the Lord. My heart and my flesh

rejoice to the living God. Ver. 3. Even the bird has found a

house, and the swallow a nest for herself, where she lays her

young, thine altars, 0 Lord of Hosts, my king and my God.

Ver. 4. Blessed are those who dwell in thy house, they shall

still praise thee.—The dydy in Ver. 1 signifies always beloved and

never lovely; comp. at Ps. xlv. 1; and the second verse is in

entire harmony with this, where the expression "how much loved

they are (by me)" is expanded; and also the parallel passage,

Ps. xxvii. "One thing I desire of the Lord, that do I seek after,

that I may dwell in the house of the Lord." The Psalmist loves

the habitations of the Lord; because he is sure of finding safety

and protection there: comp., among other passages, Ps. xxvii. 5.

The term Sabbaoth points to this ground as one to which marked

prominence is given in what follows. The Lord of Heaven is rich

in salvation on behalf of his own people; the man whom he takes

into his presence is protected, and that, too, although the whole

world were to rise up against, him: comp. Ps. xxvii. 1, “Nothing

can go entirely wrong with him whom the Most High has resolved

to aid."--The longing and fainting, in ver. 2, do not at all in-

dicate any desire completely unsatisfied at the time; but rather a

spiritual hunger, which is immediately connected with satiety, a

need which as it has arisen from enjoyment, also, calls for enjoy-

ment.  This is evident from the rejoicing, which , stands, as far

as the grammatical interpretation is concerned, inseparably con-

nected with the longing and fainting, but which, in consequence

of the erroneous view taken of the former, has been to no purpose,

considered as equivalent to to cry aloud. Nn.eri is of frequent oc-


54                      THE BOOK OF PSALMS.

 

currence in the Psalms, and always signifies to rejoice. He who

can rejoice in God must be in possession of the object of his de-

sire. In proportion as the soul has already enjoyed the grace of

God, does it earnestly long after it; and in proportion as it longs

after it does it rejoice in God. Arnd:  "This is the effect of

holy desire, the fruit of holy longing after God, for God is so gra-

cious and condescending that he does not permit the heartfelt

love and the holy desire which man bears towards him to pass

unrewarded, but so gladdens the man that he refreshes him both

in body and soul. There arises, therefore, out of heartfelt desire

after God a heartfelt joy, or true joy of the heart." The Mg

does, not indicate a climax; but, as is frequently the case (comp.,

for example; Ps. cxxxvii. 1) is a mere particle of addition. The

soul, heart, and flesh are exceedingly appropriate, when used

together, as expressive of the whole than, and therefore, as

indicating the intensity of the desire (comp. at Ps: lxiii. 1), and

the second clause begins with "they rejoice," to which the nomi-

native is soul, heart, and flesh.  The "courts of the Lord" are

the courts of the outward temple, which is also designated in ver.

1 the habitations: the desire, however, is, not to be present

in this temple corporeally, but spiritually, which is possible even

in the case of external distance the servants of the Lord dwell

always spiritually with him in his temple, and are there cared for

by him with fatherly love, comp. at Ps. xxvii. 4; xxxvi. 8; lxv.

4, and the parallel passages referred to there. The court is spe-  

cially spoken of here, as in Ps. lxv. 4; xcii. 13, because in the.

"tabernacle of meeting" it formed the external place of concourse

for the congregation; it is, therefore, there also the spiritual seat

of its members; into it there flowed upon them out of the sanc-

tuary the stream of the grace and love of God. The Nnr with

lx, to rejoice to God, who makes himself known in grace and

love to the longing soul, in rejoice, in return or response; occurs

only here.  On yh lx comp. at Ps. xlii. 2.—The simple thought of

ver. 3 is this: the dwelling in thy house, confiding relationship

to thee, secures: thy grace, with confidence and protection. The

"bird" and the swallow is the Psalmist himself, the rvrz need

not to be very exactly defined; the connection in which it is used

defines nothing except that from the parallel rvpc, and the ge-

neral sense of the passage, it must denote a little, helpless bird:


                         PSALM LXXXIV. VER. 1-4.                           55

 

comp. Ps. xi, 1, where David calls himself a "little bird," Ps. lvi.

Title (comp. lv. 6), where he calls himself "the dumb dove of

distant places," 1 Sam. xxvi. 20, where he calls himself a flea, and

compares himself to a partridge on the mountains. There is an

abbreviated comparison: like a little bird, which, after a long

defenceless wandering, has found a house (Matth. viii. 20) in

which it may dwell securely, a nest to which it may entrust with

confidence its dearest possession, its young, thus have I, a poor

wanderer, found safety and protection in thy house, 0 Lord. Jo.

Arnd:  "David gives thanks to the Lord for this, and says, my

poor little soul, the terrified little bird has now found its right

house, and its right nest, namely, thy altars; and if I had not

found this beautiful house of God, I must have been for ever-

flying about, out of the right way. I would have been like a

lonely bird on the house-top, like an owl in the desert, Ps. cii:,

like a solitary turtle dove; give not thy turtle dove into the

hands of the enemies," says Ps. lxxiv.  The Mg does not connect,

the whole passage with what goes, before (comp. Ew. § 622, Ps.

lxxxv. 12); not: even the bird has found, but: the bird has even

found. Feeble man, in this hard, troublous world, destitute of

the help and grace of God, is compared to the "little bird," and

the, "swallow." The house, in an extended sense, is brought into

notice as a place of safety for the bird, for the little bird itself, the

nest, as a place of safety for its most precious possession. On rwx  

for "where" comp., Ew. § 589. The jytvHbzm tx is the accus.

as at 1 Kings xix. 10, 14. The plural refers to the altar of burnt-  

offering, and the altar of incense-offering: comp. Num. iii. 31.

The altars are specially mentioned instead, of the whole house;

because there the relation to God was concentrated. There the

soul brings forward its spiritual offerings, which constitute the

soul even of material sacrifices, and hears the much-loved respon-

sive call of God; the assurance of his help, and his salvation, even

when the body is not near the altar. "My king and my God"

( joined together in this manner only in Ps. v. 2) gives, in connec-

tion with Sabbaoth, the ground why the Psalmist considers it

such a happy thing for him that he has been permitted access to  

the altars of God, why the house of God is to him what its house

and, nest are to the little bird. How should he not feel infinitely

safe whom his king and his God, he who guides the stars in their


56                    THE BOOK OF PSALMS.

 

courses, has taken him into his own dwelling-place. Luther took

a correct view of this verse, as is obvious from his "namely thine

altars." Modern expositors, however, have gone astray, in con-

sequence of their having unfortunately taken up the idea that the

Psalm contains the expression of the earnest longings after the

temple of one separated from it. They translate: "even the

sparrows find an house, and the swallows a nest; for themselves,

where they lay their young, in thine altars, Jehovah Sabbaoth,

my King and my God," and suppose the idea intended to be con-

veyed is: and are thus happier than I am, who am separated from

thy sanctuary. But the thought obtained in this way is one, not-

withstanding the defence which has been made of it by De Wette

and Maurer, of a trivial character, and unworthy the holy earnest-

ness of Israelitish poetry; a bird, certainly, was in no very en-

viable situation which had fixed its place of dwelling and its nest

in the house of the Lord. The main thing, moreover, I am less

fortunate than they is wanting, and added to the passage without 

any reason whatever. The "with thine altars," instead of "at,"

is very strange, and certainly the unusual    tx would not have

been used for the purpose of avoiding the ambiguity. The birds

durst build their nest if generally in the sanctuary, yet certainly

not in the neighbourhood of the altars. Finally, verse 4th is

not at all suitable, if we suppose that ver. 3 contains a lamenta-

tion over absence from the sanctuary; and even ver. 2 can only

by a false interpretation be brought, in this case, into harmony

with ver. 3.—The dwellers in the house of God, in ver. 4, are, as

was formerly shown at Ps. xxvii. 4, not those who regularly repair

to it, but the inmates (Jer. xx. 6) of God's house in a spiritual

sense. As the Psalmist, according to what has been said before,

belongs to their number, in praising their happiness, he praises

at the same time his own: happy, therefore, also I. In the

second clause, the ground of this praise is given: for they shall

still (even though for the present they may be in misery) praise

him; he by imparting to them his salvation, give them yet

occasion to do so: comp. "he will praise me," for "he will get

occasion to do so," Ps. 1. 15, 23, and also lxxix. 13. It is usually

translated: always they praise thee. But with this construction

the use of dvf in the parallel passage, Ps. xlii. 6, is not attended

to. Besides, dvf never means always. Gen, xlvi. 29 is to be trans-


                      PSALM LXXXIV. VER. 1-4.                         57

 

lated: and he wept still upon his neck when Israel spoke. In

Ruth i. 14, the dvf, "they wept still," refers back to

ver. 9.

            The sons of Korah now open up, in ver. 5-7, to the anointed

of the Lord the second fountain of consolation, they point out to

him the pledge of salvation which had been imparted to him

through his trust in God and the blamelessness of his walk.—

Ver. 5. Blessed is the man whose strength is in thee, in whose

hearts (are) ways. Ver. 6. Going through the valley of tears, they

make it a well; the teacher is even covered with blessing. Ver.

7. They go from strength to strength, he appears before God in

Zion.—Ver. 6 and 7 contain the grounds on which the declara-

tion of blessedness made in ver. 5 is founded: Blessed are they,

for in passing through the valley of tears, &c. Ver. 5 contains.

two conditions of salvation. First, that a man has his strength

in God, has him as his strength. Jo. Arnd: "But what

does having God for our strength mean? It means that we

place the trust of our heart, our confidence, help, and consolation

only in him, and in no creature, be it power, skill, honour, or

riches. That is a happy man who knows in his heart of no other

strength, help, and comfort than of God."