BIBLIOTHECA SACRA 147 (July 1990) 286-308
Copyright © 1990 by
An Exposition of Psalm 22
Mark H. Heinemann
Lecturer in Practical Theology
German Theological Seminary,
"Extraordinary" is the word for Psalm 22. The craftsmanship of
its poetry, the boldness of its images, and the sweep of its historical
scope all contribute to this impression. But the most striking thing
about Psalm 22 is its messianic character. God inspired David to
write in such a way that certain aspects of the crucifixion of Jesus
Christ were clearly prefigured: His perplexed cry, "My God, my
God"1 (v. 1; see Mark 15:34), the mockings of the onlookers (Ps. 22:6-8;
see Matt. 27:39-43), the piercing of His hands and feet (Ps. 22:16, see
John 20:24-27), and the casting of lots for His garments (Ps. 22:18; see
John 19:24). The fact that the writer to the Hebrews quoted Psalm
22:22 in Hebrews 2:12 as the words of Jesus certainly validates the
view that the psalm is messianic.
In the course of studying the psalm, the messianic aspect must be
kept in mind. A number of intriguing questions arise. What experi-
ences was David describing? In what ways do his descriptions go be-
yond his own experience, if any? Did he knowingly prophesy?
But in seeking to answer these questions, it is important to note
that the psalm has a message in itself for both the readers of that
day and those of the present. This message is summarized in Psalm
22:24: "For He has not despised nor abhorred the affliction of the af-
flicted; and He has not hidden His face from him; but when he cried
to Him, He heard." Despite his feelings of being forsaken by God
and man, and despite his terrible sufferings at the hands of his ene-
mies, David kept praying in faith down to the last moment, and ul-
1 All Scripture quotations (other than from Ps. 22, which is translated by the
writer) are from the New International Version.
An Exposition of Psalm 22 287
timately found that God had heard his cries for help and had an-
swered him. The messianic aspect serves to underline this theme in
that Jesus Christ became the ultimate example of this kind of faith
under similar circumstances.
Psalm 22 has three virtually equal parts.2 The first section (vv.
1-10) is David's introductory address.3 Faced with severe trials, he
answered his doubts about God's care by remembering God's past
faithfulness to his believing forefathers and to himself. As he
moved through the four small groups of poetic lines in this section,
he told God about his tremendous inner battle with doubt. This con-
flict is reflected by the alternation between his describing the rejec-
tion he felt from God in the present, and his pointing out that God
had faithfully cared for his forefathers and for him in the past.
In the second section (vv. 11-21), David kept asking God for de-
liverance from his trials until he got an answer. This section includes
three parts: his introductory petition, his lament, and his primary
petition followed by God's answer. The two petitions bracket the
lament, in which David described his suffering at the hands of his
inhuman enemies. But this psalm is not just about suffering; it also
tells of victory. After stating at the end of the second section, "You
have heard me," he launched into a third section (vv. 22-31), one of
praise. Having once again experienced God's care in the midst of tri-
als, David publicly praised Him. In the first part of this section, he
2 This view of the psalm's structure is based on two observations: (1) the sections are
easily differentiated by their content; and (2) each of the three sections is delimited
by the use of a repeated word or phrase (vv. 1-10, "my God"; vv. 11-21, "far"; vv. 22-
32, "I will tell" and "They will declare") that brackets the section at the beginning
and end. Using W. G. E. Watson's terms, "my God" would be classified as an "envelope
figure," "far" as a "refrain," and the last device as "distant parallelism." But Watson
admits that these closely related types of poetic tools are not always easy to distin-
guish from one another. In Psalm 22 all three of these devices function like envelope
figures which, according to Kessler's definition (quoted by Watson), work "to frame a
unit; to stablize the material enclosed; to emphasize by repetition and to establish
rhetorical connection of the intervening material" (W. G. E. Watson, Classical He-
breza Poetry [
ternate view of the structure.
3 Claus Westermann (following Hermann Gunkel,
hoek and Ruprecht, 19261, p. 90) categorizes this psalm as an individual lament. As
such, it contains the typical elements in almost the typical order: introductory ad-
dress, lament, petition (in this psalm, split into two parts, an introductory petition be-
fore the lament and the primary petition after the lament), confidence of being heard
(in this psalm taking the place of the confession of confidence usually found after the
lament, and consisting of one phrase at the end of v. 21), and praise (including both the
vow of praise, vv. 22, 25; declarative praise, v. 24; and the two elements usually found
in the praise categories, call to praise, v. 23; and descriptive praise, v. 28). Wester-
mann writes, "This is the basic structure, but it never becomes a rigid pattern! The
possibilities for variation are exceptionally abundant." His terminology is used in
part in the outline presented here (Claus Westermann, Lob and Klage in den Psalmen,
288 Bibliotheca Sacra / July-September 1990
praised the Lord and exhorted his fellow believing Israelites to do
the same. In the second part, he predicted that God would be wor-
shiped by all nations and proclaimed by future generations.
Introductory Address (vv. 1-10)
In his introductory address David, faced with severe trials, an-
swered his doubts about God's care by remembering God's faithful-
ness to his believing forefathers and to himself.4
1 My God, my God, why have You forsaken me? Why are You so far
from saving me, so far from the words of my groaning?
2 0 my God, I cry out by day, and You do not answer, and at night, but I
have no rest.
3 But You are holy, You who are
enthroned upon the praises of
4 In You our fathers trusted; they trusted and You delivered them.
5 To You they cried out, and were delivered; in You they trusted and
were not ashamed.
6 But I am a worm, and not a man; a reproach of men and despised by
7 All who see me mock me; they sneer, shaking their heads:
8 “Commit yourself to the LORD! Let Him rescue him--let Him deliver
him, since He delights in him."
9 Yet You took me out of the womb, causing me to trust upon my
10 From birth I was cast upon You; from my mother's womb You have
been my God.
SINCE GOD APPARENTLY DID NOT RESPOND TO HIS CONTINUAL PLEAS
FOR HELP, DAVID ASKED GOD WHY HE HAD FORSAKEN HIM (vv. 1-2)
The wrenching cry "My God, my God, why have You forsaken
me?" is one of the most striking opening lines in the Psalms. David's
emotional pain is emphasized by the twofold repetition of "My
God," and yet the threefold repetition of the possessive suffix "my"
in the first two verses also emphasizes that he was clinging to his
relationship to God as his last hope in the face of despair. This is
the hope to which he returned at the close of this 10-verse section.
Jesus cried out these words when He died on the cross (Matt.
27:46; Mark 15:34). He must have read this psalm many times, al-
ready having at age 12 extensive knowledge of the Scriptures (Luke
4 The superscription reads, "For the director of music: to the tune of 'The Doe of the
Morning.' A psalm of David." Though the significance of this superscription is un-
known, it probably refers to either the tune or the content of the psalm. It could also
possibly be translated "On the help at daybreak." See Peter C. Craigie, Psalms 1-50,
Word Biblical Commentary, vol. 19 (Waco, TX: Word Books, 1983), p. 196, and Derek
Kidner, Psalms 1-72 (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1973), pp. 41-42.
An Exposition of Psalm 22 289
2:46-47). It seems logical to deduce that on the cross Jesus repeated
the words of Psalm 22:1 to express His agony and to emphasize the
prophetic connection between Himself and the psalm.
In the second half of verse 1 a key word "far" is used for the first
time in the psalm.5 "Far" also occurs in verse 11 ("Do not be far from
me, for trouble is near and there is no one to help") and in verse 19 in
the final petition for help.6 The repetition of key words or phrases
is sometimes used in the Psalms to develop important themes.7 The
concept of being far from God is used in this psalm to help communi-
cate David's total aloneness and helplessness in the face of the
threat of death. By contrast, he associated the nearness of God with
rescue from his enemies, almost as if to say, "If God is near, then He
will do what is right and all will be well."
Verse 2 has two synthetically parallel lines that form a merism
in which "by day" and "by night" together convey the meaning "con-
tinually." To complete the parallel, the last phrase (lit., "and si-
lence is not to me") is translated "and I have no rest," in this case,
the rest from anxiety that would come if God answered him.8
DAVID ACKNOWLEDGED THAT GOD IS HOLY AND NEVER BETRAYED HIS
BELIEVING FOREFATHERS' TRUST (vv. 3-5)
The words "But You" (waw adversative) that begin verse 3 mark
a strong contrast between what David has just told God about how he
felt and the reminder he was now going to give God about what kind
of God he knew Him to be. Perhaps he was reminding himself as
well in an attempt to control his strong feelings.
5 N. H. Ridderbos maintains that "far" is a structural key that divides verses 1-21,
what he calls the "lament song" section of the psalm, into three parts (1-10, 11-18, 19-
21). This approach has the appeal of having a simple structural key and a good fit
with Westermann's typical individual lament structure. This is fine as far as it goes,
but the problem is that the repeated "far" does not mark off the obvious break be-
tween verse 21 and 22 and so is better seen as functioning as a catchword that links just
first two major sections (Die Psalmen [
89; cf. Watson, Classical Hebrew Poetry, p. 288).
6 The fact that "far" is used in verses 11 and 19 to describe God's relationship to the
psalmist supports the NIV translation of the second half of verse 1: "Why are you so
far from saving me, so far from the words of my groaning?" instead of the rendering of
the NASB--"Far from my deliverance are the words of my groaning"--which empha-
sizes the relationship between the psalmist's prayer and his deliverance. See J. A.
Alexander, The Psalms (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1975), pp. 98-99.
7 The use of "far" corresponds to what Robert Alter calls "anaphora," defined as
"the rhetorically emphatic reiteration of a single word or brief phrase, in itself not a
complete unit" (The Art of Biblical
1985], p. 64).
8 This phrase could also be translated "[I] am not silent' (NIV). The language used
here produces an ironic play on words in which the psalmist stated that he had no
"silence" as he complained about God's silence.
290 Bibliotheca Sacra I July-September 1990
The psalmist told God He is holy, meaning separate, or set
apart.9 Perhaps his idea was, "Because You are holy (i.e., set apart
from sin) I know You would never break your covenant with me by
suddenly abandoning me."10 But this notion of God's being set apart
is clarified by the second half of the line, "You who are enthroned
"sitting"] upon the praises of
and distinct from all others in that He has faithfully delivered
God-fearing Israelites of days gone by. He has been greatly praised
for this, and these praises form, in a figurative sense, a throne on
which God sits as King.11 Later David added to this his own praise
of God in Psalm 22:22-26 and celebrated the kingship of the Lord in
the verses following that (vv. 27-31).
In the spirit of this concept, in verses 4 and 5 David built a
three-line "throne" of synonymously parallel expressions of praise
for coming to the aid of his believing forefathers. He emphasized
the idea that God comes to the aid of those who trust Him. The rep-
etition of "but You" (v. 3), "in You" (v. 4), "to You," and "in You" (v.
5), as well as the threefold repetition of the idea of trust followed
by deliverance, also conveys the psalmist's point.
If the last word in verse 5 is translated "ashamed," rather than
"disappointed" (NASB, NIV), the important contrast that connects
verses 3-5 with verses 6-8 is established.12 David used this figura-
tive language (metonymy of effect and understatement) instead of
simply repeating "deliver" again so that he could more directly con-
trast the faith-victories of his forefathers with the shame he
presently felt as he was mocked for trusting God in the face of his
own apparent faith-defeat. This shame is described in the next
9 See Francis Brown, S. R. Driver, and Charles A. Briggs, A Hebrew and English
Lexicon of the Old Testament (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1907), s.v. “wOdqA,” p. 872.
10 J. J. S. Perowne, The Book of
Psalms (1878; reprint,
lishing House, 1966, p. 240). It could also be asserted that the psalmist mentioned
God's holiness at this point in order to explain God's silence--the idea being that
David's sinfulness was the cause of the problem. But this view is rejected because (1)
elsewhere in the Psalms, David was open and honest about personal sin when that
was his problem (Pss. 32, 38, 51, etc.), yet there is no confession of sin in Psalm 22; and
(2) the silence of God is only temporary and God in fact did hear his cry (vv. 21, 24).
11 A. F. Kirkpatrick believes this may be a figurative adaptation of the idea of God
being enthroned between the cherubim on the ark of the covenant (Exod. 25:22), as di-
rectly rectly expressed in Psalms 80:1 and 99:1 (The Book of Psalms [1902; reprint, Grand
Rapids: Baker Book House, 1982], p. 116).
12 Charles A. Briggs, The Book of the Psalms, The International Critical
2 vols. (1906; reprint,
Brown, Driver, and Briggs, A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament; s.v.
p. 101, which lists the basic meaning of the root as "be ashamed."
An Exposition of Psalm 22 291
DAVID, HOWEVER, FELT SUBHUMAN BECAUSE PEOPLE WERE MOCKING
HIM FOR TRUSTING GOD (vv. 6-8)
Another contrastive waw and emphatic pronoun ("But I . . .") in-
troduce a second small section in which David described to God his
feelings of rejection. He felt shame, the shame of being mocked for
his seemingly futile cries to God. He felt like a "worm," a subhuman
who was not in the same category as his forefathers. Besides feeling
ignored by God, he was also rejected by men. He was a "reproach"
and "despised." In verse 7 David intensified the word picture of the
mockery: they "mock," "sneer,"13 and were "shaking their heads."
Then in verse 8 he told the Lord specifically what they were saying.
The first word of verse 8 is translated as an imperative:
"Commit yourself to the Lord."14 This first clause should be under-
stood as an ironic, mocking charge to the helpless psalmist. The rest
of the verse, with all its pronouns in the third person, can be seen as
the mockers' cynical comments to one another in David's hearing.
The phrase, "since [yKi taken causally] He delights in him," implies
that the mockers were aware that he claimed to have a close, posi-
tive relationship with the Lord. From the New Testament perspec-
tive one can see a close resemblance between what David described
and what happened to Jesus. This claim by Jesus of a special rela-
tionship to God was derided by the mockers at the foot of the cross
(Matt. 27:43, "for he said, 'I am the Son of God"'). It is this close re-
lationship that David held up to God in the last of the four small
parts of this section.
NEVERTHELESS DAVID POINTED OUT TO GOD THAT HE HAD BEEN DAVID'S
GOD SINCE BIRTH (vv. 9-10)
David repeated the yKi that began the ironic last phrase of the
last section, but now gave it an adversative sense and tied to it an-
other emphatic pronoun--"Yet You. . . ."15 In this way he rebounded
from the mockers' questioning of his relationship to God into a rebut-
tal in which he insisted that he had always had the closest possi-
13 Literally, "separate the lip." This is taken as a description of a sneering facial
expression, but it could also describe the movement of lips in (insulting) speech, as the
NIV translates it: "hurl insults."
14 See Brown, Driver, and Briggs, A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old
Testament, s.v. “llaGA,” p. 165. Proverbs 16:3 has the identical construction.
15 See E. Kautzsch, Gesenins' Hebrew
follows a negation virtually contained in the previous sentence in the form of an ironic
expression "since He delights in him." Another option would be to take it emphati-
cally as "indeed" (cf. Bruce K. Waltke and Michael O'Connor, An Introduction to Bib-
lical Hebrew Syntax [Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 19891, p. 665, sec. 39.3.4e).
292 Bibliotheca Sacra / July-September 1990
ble relationship to God. The idea that this relationship was of the
longest possible standing is strongly emphasized by the fourfold rep-
etition of birth images ("out of the womb," "upon my mother's
breasts," "from birth," and "from my mother's womb").
The relationship of a believer to God has roots that go back be-
fore birth. David wrote in Psalm 139:13, "You knit me together in my
mother's womb." Paul wrote in Ephesians 1, "For he chose us in him
[i.e., Christ] before the creation of the world" (v. 4), and "in love he
predestined us to be adopted as his sons through Jesus Christ" (v. 5).
He did not predestine believers to adoption and then knit them in
the womb only to abandon them later (cf. Job 10:8-12).
The poetry in verses 9-10 is intricate, as the diagram below
Verse 9 Verse 10
a . Yet You took me out d. upon You
b. from the belly (NF,BAmi) c. I was cast from the womb
c. causing me to trust b. from the belly (NF,B,mi) of my
d. upon my mother's breasts a. You are my God
Verse 10 is a mirror image of verse 9. Verse 9 talks about God,
then the belly, then an action done to the psalmist, and then the
place of the action, and verse 10 exactly reverses this order.17 The
two middle half-lines in both verses are linked by poetic devices--in
verse 9 by a type of rhyme between the Hebrew roots in "belly" and
"causing me to trust,"18 and in verse 10 by the synonymity between
"belly" and "womb." The reference to "my God" at the end of verse
10 points back to the opening words of verse 1. Neither God's silence
nor men's mockings could shake David's conviction that the Lord was
still his God.
David answered the sneers of the mockers. Did they question
whether God delighted in him? God personally took him from the
womb and caused him to rest on his mother's breasts. Did they laugh
as they told him to commit himself to (lit., "roll onto") God? He was
cast on his God from the beginning.
The idea in verse 9 that God took David from the womb can be
understood in the sense that God superintended the birth process.
But what does it mean that God caused him to trust on the breasts of
16 The translation in this diagram is literal in order to show the relationships be-
tween the words more clearly.
17 This technique is called chiasmus or mirror symmetry (Watson, Classical Hebrew
Poetry, p. 203).
18 This is called paronomasia (ibid., p. 242).
An Exposition of Psalm 22 293
his mother? The NIV renders "trust in you, even at, implying that
somehow even as a little baby David trusted God. Nowhere in the
Bible is there any solid evidence of a baby being able to have faith.
Therefore it seems best to take this as meaning that God made him
feel secure with his mother when he was a baby.19 David added
that he had been cast on the Lord from birth and from that time on
He had been his God. In other words God had watched over him all
his life. He claimed a special relationship with God.
In verses 9-10 images of the psalmist's mother abound, but no
mention is made of the father. Why? Because David was picturing
God as his Father. It is interesting to note with regard to the mes-
sianic aspect of this psalm that the Prophet Isaiah used remarkably
similar imagery to describe the Messiah's relationship to Yahweh.
He reported the Messiah as saying, "Before I was born the LORD
called me; from my birth he has made mention of my name. . . . And
now the LORD says--he who formed me in the womb to be his ser-
vant" (Isa. 49:1, 5).20
Despite his difficult situation, David clung to God, displaying
in his life, in the words of C. S. Lewis, "the union of total privation
with total adherence to God, to a God who makes no response, simply
because of what God is."21 He then turned his attention once more to
describing his situation to God and asking for His help.
Petition (vv. 11-21)
In this next section David kept asking God for deliverance from
his trials until he got an answer.
11 Do not be far from me, for trouble is near and there is no one to help.
12 Many bulls have surrounded me;
strong bulls of
13 They open wide their mouth at me, as a ravening and roaring lion.
14 I am poured out like water, and all my bones are out of joint. My
heart is like wax; it is melted within me.
15 My strength is dried up like a potsherd, and my tongue cleaves to my
palate; and You lay me in the dust of death.
16 For dogs have surrounded me; a band of evildoers has encircled me;
They are piercing my hands and my feet.
17 I can count all my bones; they stare, they look at me.
18 They divide my garments among them and cast lots for my clothing.
19 Alexander, The Psalms, p. 101; Mitchell Dahood, Psalms I, 1-50, The Anchor
Bible (Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Co., 1966), p. 739.
20 In this regard it is interesting to note that David anticipated Isaiah's descriptions
of the Suffering Servant in Isaiah 42:1-4; 49:1-6; and 52:13-53:12 (cf. James L. Mays,
"Prayer and Christology: Psalm 22 as Perspective on the Passion," Theology Today 42
[October 1985]: 329).
21 Reflections on the Psalms (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1958), p. 127.
294 Bibliotheca Sacra / July-September 1990
19 But You, 0 LORD, be not far off; 0 my Strength, come quickly to help
20 Deliver my life from the sword, my only life from the power of the
21 Rescue me from the lion's mouth; and from the horns of the wild
oxen You have heard me.
INTRODUCTORY PETITION: DAVID ASKED GOD TO BE CLOSE BECAUSE HE
WAS IN TROUBLE AND HAD NO ONE TO HELP HIM (v. 11)
This verse has the poetic structure of a tricolon (2+2+2) with the
last two cola functioning as causal clauses. Such structure gives the
verse special emphasis.22
Exegetes are divided as to whether verse 11 belongs with verse
10 (NIV, Alexander, Anderson, Delitzsch, Gunkel) or 12 (NASB, Briggs,
Kirkpatrick, Perowne, Ridderbos) or alone (Craigie). Given the
tight alternating four-piece structure of verses 1-10, it is better to
leave verse 11 standing alone or connect it with verse 12 as an intro-
ductory petition leading into (and delimiting, together with the re-
peated refrain in vv. 19-21-see note 2) the lament section.
The question of verse 1 now becomes a prayer, and this is a sign of
faith.23 In this brief prayer David asked for nearness and not rescue,
perhaps because the dangers he faced had yet to be described.
LAMENT: DAVID DESCRIBED FOR GOD HIS ENEMIES AND THE EXTREME
SUFFERING THEY WERE INFLICTING ON HIM (vv. 12-18)
David described his enemies surrounding him as being like
strong, ravenous animals (vv. 12-13). The bulls
strong animals (cf. Amos 4:1).24 There were many of them, he said,
and they encircled him, so the odds were overwhelming and he was
in a vulnerable position. Furthermore they were poised for attack.
Like hungry lions they opened their mouths wide and roared.
David described his physical suffering (vv. 14-15). He de-
scribed his suffering in graphic language that spoke of a total ("all
my bones") loss of control. The images of poured-out water and dislo-
cated bones seem to describe his loss of physical strength, while the
melted heart of wax seems to describe his loss of emotional strength.25
However, these could all be figures of great fear and loss of erno-
22 Ridderbos, Die Psalmen, p. 191.
23 Kirkpatrick, The Book of Psalms, p. 118.
24 Cf. A. A. Anderson, The Book of Psalms, 2 vols., New Century Bible Commentary
(Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1972),1:189.
25 In Joshua 7:5 the almost identical figure is used when the Israelites were defeated
at Ai: "the hearts of the people melted and became like water."
An Exposition of Psalm 22 295
tional strength.26 The concept of physical dryness is conveyed by the
figure of the potsherd and David's description of his tongue sticking
to the inside of his mouth. All his vital fluids were draining away,
and with them, his strength. Again, these could refer to great fear
that makes one feel weak and makes the mouth dry.
In other psalms emotional suffering is described in physical
terms. For example in Psalm 102, the psalmist, suffering from what
seems to be primarily emotional distress, nevertheless wrote using
physical images: "my bones burn like glowing embers" (v. 3), "my
heart is blighted and withered like grass" (v. 4), "because of my loud
groaning, I am reduced to skin and bones" (v. 5), and "I wither away
like grass" (v. 11).
Of course the obvious problem is that emotional and physical
distress are not easily separated. Psychosomatic medicine has arisen
out of the discovery that stress causes physical problems. And the
psalmists sometimes did not give detailed information about the
source of their problems. For example in Psalm 116:3 the psalmist
wrote, "The cords of death entangled me, the anguish of the grave
came upon me; I was overcome by trouble and sorrow." The psalm it-
self gives no clues as to what his trouble was and whether he faced
emotional stress or physical problems or a combination of the two.
In Psalm 22, however, the context of violence leads one to con-
clude that David was describing both emotional and physical suffer-
ing. He was being threatened by evil men who acted like wild ''
beasts. They are described as encircling David (vv. 12, 16), piercing
his hands and feet (v. 16), casting lots for his clothing (v. 18),
threatening him with the sword and attacking him like dogs (v. 20),
and threatening to tear him like lions and gore him like wild oxen
(v. 21). He clearly expected to die (v. 15).
Some have supposed that sickness is being described here.27 But
Kidner writes, "While verses 14, 15, taken alone, could describe
merely a desperate illness, the context is of collective animosity and
the symptoms could be those of Christ's scourging and crucifixion; in
fact verses 16-18 had to wait for that event to unfold their meaning
with any clarity."28
Ridderbos notes that after 15b the parallel structure of the verse
ends, and the last clause ("And You lay me in the dust of death") is a
monocolon "after-beat."29 As such it has a special emphasis appro-
26 Cf. Briggs, The Book of the Psalms, pp. 195-96.
27 Craigie, Psalms 1-50, pp. 198-200.
28 Kidner, Psalms 1-72, p. 107.
29 Die Psalmen, pp. 13, 191.
296 Bibliotheca Sacra / July-September 1990
priate to the content; David clearly believed that he would die.30
David further described his helplessness as he was mistreated
by his inhuman enemies (vv. 16-18). Dogs are the third type of ani-
mal used to characterize David's enemies, chosen no doubt because
they were so looked down on in the ancient Near East.31 This image
emphasizes the cruel, filthy nature of those who surrounded him.
Next he dropped the figurative language and called his enemies "a
band of evildoers." They were not only his enemies; as doers of evil
they were also enemies of God. The idea of being surrounded is re-
peated from verse 12 to emphasize the precariousness of his position.
The poetic arrangement emphasizes the last phrase of verse 16.
The first two parts of this tricolon (3+3+3) are parallel, but the last
one stands apart, highlighting its unusual statement: "They are
piercing my hands and my feet."32 This is a striking prefiguring of
30 Briggs notes that the phrase "the dust of death" is "especially appropriate . . . to
the previous context, the dry, brittle potsherd . . . and also the conception of death as
a return of the body to dust, Gn. 3:19" (The Book of Psalms, p. 196).
31 Cf. A. Cohen, The Psalms (London: Soncino Press, 1974), p. 63. Psalm 59 is another
example of the use of this image in which David characterized Saul's men, sent to
kill David, as a pack of dogs.
32 This passage is disputed. Perowne writes: "There is scarcely any passage of the
Old Testament, the true reading and interpretation of which have given rise to so
much discussion" (The Book of Psalms, p. 246). The Masoretic Text says, "like a lion
my hands and my feet," with no verb. If this is the correct reading, it requires that a
verb be supplied or understood. One option (Option A) is that there originally was a
verb which was subsequently lost through scribal error. Cohen, for example, suggests
that the original text "may have had both a verb and like a lion which were very
similar in spelling" (The Psalms, p. 64). The verb then must have been accidentally
omitted through haplography, in which "two identical or similar letters, groups of
letters, or words are found together in an immediate sequence, and one of them is
omitted by error" (Ernst Wurthwein, The Text of the Old Testament, trans. Erroll F.
option, a second textual corruption at this same place must be postulated to account for
the Septuagint reading. Another option (option B) is that the phrase never had a
verb. Ellipsis of the verb is not uncommon in Hebrew poetry, both in the Psalms and in
other poetic sections of the Old Testament (cf. Alter, The Art of Biblical Poetry, p. 7,
Michael O'Connor, Hebrew Verse Structure
pp. 122-29, for more on "verb gapping" [O'Connor's term]). With this technique the
verb preceding or (rarely) following does duty for two (and occasionally three) cola or
lines. Psalm 22:2 is an example: "O my God, I cry out by day, and You do not answer,
and [I cry out] at night, but I have no rest."
This hypothesis then suggests that the verb "encircled" would do duty for the
second and third cola of verse 16 as follows: "For dogs have surrounded me; a band of
i( evildoers has encircled me; like a lion [they have encircled] my hands and my feet."
A variation of this option is Cohen's idea that a verb of being and a preposition
should be supplied--"are at" (The Psalms, p. 64). Under Option B the reading in the
Septuagint would be accounted for by some sort of textual corruption.
The biggest problem with both of the above options is that the use of leads one to
expect a comparison between what David's enemies were doing and what a lion might
be expected to do. But what would a lion be doing to a victim's hands and feet? Dogs
may be expected to snap at one's hands and feet, but a big cat "stalks its prey to a point
An Exposition of Psalm 22 297
what happened to Jesus when He was crucified. Pre-Christian read-
ers must have thought it an obscure figurative expression, which
they perhaps attributed to poetic license.33
"I can count all my bones" is a poetic way of saying the psalmist
as close as allowed by available cover, then closes the final distance by a leap or a
short dash.... If overtaken the prey is thrown down and dispatched with a deep bite,
usually in the neck" (Encyclopedia Britannica, 15th ed., s.v. "Carnivora," by Howard
J. Stains [professor of zoology at Southern Illinois University]).
Option C is that the Septuagint reading is the correct one: "they are piercing my
hands and my feet." This view holds that the Septuagint (using the verb o]ru<ssw, "to
dig, bore through") represents a superior text that was corrupted to the Masoretic Text
reading either by (a) a scribal error in which UrxEKA (“they are piercing,” assuming the
root rUK "bore, dig, hew" [Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament, s.v. "rUK," by R.
Laird Harris, 1:4351 or root hrAKA "to dig" [mentioned as an option but not chosen by
Craigie, Psalms 1-50, p. 196]) was changed to yrxEKA ("like a lion"); or (b) a scribal error
in which the pointing was altered, changing a participle "piercing" (which would
have been the only occurrence in the Old Testament) into a noun with a prefixed
"like a lion" (Perowne, The Book of Psalms, pp. 246-47). The x may be explained as an
ancient mater lectionis.
In favor of Option A or B are the following arguments: (1) lions are mentioned else-
where in the psalm; (2) the Gospels do not cite or apply this verse (which seems
strange if it so strikingly prefigures the piercing of Jesus' hands and feet); (3)
"piercing" in the Septuagint goes too far beyond David's experience and is too striking
a "prophecy" (suspicion of later textual corruption by Christians); and (4) most He-
brew manuscripts have "like a lion." The following points argue for adopting the
translation "they are piercing" (Option C): (1) the Masoretic Text reading is awk-
ward, for unlike other verb ellipsis situations in Hebrew poetry, the relationship
between the subject "lion" and the objects "my hands and my feet" is not easily ex-
plainable (Gunkel states bluntly, "the lion does not 'encircle' the 'hands and feet' of
his victim" [Die Psalmen, p. 96]) and therefore can be suspected of being corrupted; (2)
two Hebrew manuscripts do attest to the Septuagint reading (Perowne, The Book of
Psalms, p. 246), (3) elsewhere the Messiah is pictured as pierced (Isa. 53:5; Zech.
12:10); (4) point number 2 above in favor of options A and B is an argument from silence,
and (5) point number 3 above in favor of options A and B begs the question, does not ac-
knowledge that intentional corruption could be argued from either side, and fails to
take into account the pre-Christian origin of the Septuagint.
This is a complicated textual problem. The lack of sense (there is no logical rela-
tionship between a lion and the psalmist's hands and feet) of the Masoretic Text read-
ing makes it doubtful that this is a case of verb ellipsis, thus making Option B un-
likely. For Option A one must postulate two corruptions at the same place, making it a
less likely option than the other two. On the other hand the unique verbal form and
the obscure meaning (now no longer obscure) of the Septuagint reading make it a good
candidate for an intentional emendation according to the canon of textual criticism
that says that the more difficult reading (in the sense of using rare words or more com-
plicated constructions; cf. Wurthwein, The Text of the Old Testament, p. 109) is the
more likely one. Taking the third option, only one corruption need be postulated.
Adding to this the fact that reasonable solutions have been proposed for how the orig-
inal text represented by the Septuagint reading could have been corrupted to the Ma-
soretic Text reading, it seems best to adopt the translation "they are piercing."
33 Even if one holds to the reading, "like a lion my hands and my feet," the prefigur-
ing is only weakened in its directness; it is not disposed of entirely. It is important to
note that there would still be a strong correspondence between David's enemies doing
298 Bibliotheca Sacra / July-September 1990
was exposed and his flesh emaciated. It seems logical to conclude
that he was as close to death as one could be and still be alive.
Meanwhile his enemies watched him dying, dividing up his cloth-
ing. This shows that in their minds his death was a foregone conclu-
sion. Here again is an amazing correspondence between the experi-
ence of David and that of Jesus Christ.
PRIMARY PETITION: DAVID ONCE AGAIN ASKED GOD TO DELIVER HIM,
AND GOD ANSWERED HIM (vv. 19-21)
David asked God to deliver him (vv. 19-21a). This section be-
gins with an adversative "But You" as David looked away from his
enemies and back to God. Once again he picked up the catchword
"far" (compare vv. 1, 11), which ties together the first two-thirds of
the psalm. He repeated and expanded the petition of verse 11, thus
bracketing the middle section of the psalm at the beginning and end.
Having described his helplessness and total loss of strength, he now
called on God, his Strength, to help him. On the brink of death
("come quickly"), he petitioned God to save him.
David here exemplified praying with perseverance. The ac-
count of his praying for his first child by Bathsheba illustrates the
same point (2 Sam. 12:16-23). There we see him praying that the
child would be spared, seemingly against all hope, right up until the
child died. This is the same lesson taught by the parable of the
Widow and the Unjust Judge in Luke 18, as Jesus stated it, "that they
[the disciples] should always pray and not give up" (Luke 18:1).
At this point, David used the poetic device of repeating in re-
verse order the figurative designations he used for his enemies in
verses 12-13, and 16.
Verses 12-13, 16 Verses 20-21a, b
a . bulls d. (sword)
b. lion's mouth c. dogs
c. dogs b. lion's mouth
d. band of evildoers a. (wild oxen)
The chiasmus is not perfect, though "sword" could serve as a
metonymy of adjunct for "band of evildoers" and "wild oxen" is very
close to "bulls."34 This device serves to tie this petition closely to
the description of trouble in the preceding verses (vv. 12-18). The
"sword" here is a symbol of a violent end (at the hand of another
man).35 "My only life" is literally "my only one," referring to "the
something harmful to his hands and feet and the fact that Jesus' enemies did some-
thing harmful to His hands and feet when they crucified Him. The connection and
thus the prefiguring remains intact because of the specific and unusual mention of
David's hands and feet.
34 It may be that "sword" and "wild oxen" are used as figures because they correlate
to the previous designations and at the same time develop further the intensity of the
feeling of danger (the band now has swords, and the bulls are now wild).
35 Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament, s.v. br,H,, by R. Laird Harris, 1:320.
An Exposition of Psalm 22 299
one unique and priceless possession which can never be replaced."36
God answered him (v. 21b). The phrase "from the horns" may
refer to the place from which the prayer proceeded, and the place to
which the answer came "to the soul in the midst of its uttermost dis-
tresses."37 Kirkpatrick comments on verse 21b, "A singularly bold and
forcible construction. We expect a second imperative, repeating the
prayer for deliverance."38 Instead a perfect tense is used: "You have
heard me."39 David finally received an answer from God, and the
implication (from the fact that he was praising God in vv. 22-31) is
that he had been delivered from death at the last possible moment.
But why did David not state what God did? David wrote that
God heard (vv. 21, 24) and later (v. 31) that He did it. After such a
vivid description of David's problems, bringing the readers' emo-
tional focus to a white-hot point as he reached the brink of death,
one would expect more than a one-word reference to the mighty de-
liverance that God accomplished for him. One possible reason for
this brevity is that in the individual lament psalms, the psalmist
usually voiced only the confidence that he had been heard, without
giving details about the victory God accomplished on his behalf.40
Looking back from the present, it is clear, as stated at the outset
of this article, that there are several points of correspondence be-
tween David's experiences as he described them in this psalm and
the record in the New Testament Gospels of the crucifixion of the
Messiah, Jesus Christ. Some expositors deny that there is any corre-
spondence.41 Others, such as Westermann, see the connection, but
36 Brown, Driver, and Briggs, A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament,
p. 402; cf. the identical usage in Psalm 35:17.
37 Alexander, The Psalms, p. 104; Perowne, The Book of Psalms, p. 243.
38 Kirkpatrick, The Book of Psalms, p. 120.
39 Craigie, Psalms 1-50, p. 200; Perowne, The Book of Psalms, p. 243. This phrase
"You have heard me" translates one Hebrew word.
40 Westermann, Lob and Klage in dem Psalmen, pp. 49-50. Another reason may be
that the lack of explanation concerning the nature of the psalmist's deliverance con-
ceals the reality that the answer to the prayers of David's antitype (see discussion of
typology following this note), the Messiah, would not be rescue, but resurrection. For
the present-day Christian reader, then, the brief notice "You have heard me," fol-
lowed by a distinct break in the psalm (without a description or at least a notice that
he was saved from death), fits perfectly with the fact that Jesus accepted the Fa-
ther's answer that He must die for the sins of the world. Jesus' response was "Father,
into your hands I commit my spirit" (Luke 23:46) and ''It is finished" (John 19:30), and
He died. He was not delivered from the sword, the dogs, the lion's mouth, and the
horns of the wild oxen. Thus the lack of detail allows the passage to fit the situation
of both type and antitype.
41 Cohen writes (unconvincingly), "A Christological intention has long been read into
this Psalm, but modern Christian exegetes are agreed that it describes a situation then
existing and does not anticipate an event in the future" (The Psalms, p. 61).
300 Bibliotheca Sacra / July-September 1990
deny that it is prophetic, claiming that the primitive church saw
the connection and incorporated Psalm 22 in the passion story.42 It is
beyond the scope of this article to critique thoroughly the philology
and theology that underlies such denials. But it must be said that in
Acts 2:25-36, for example, Peter was convinced that David was a
prophet through whom God predicted the future. Commenting on
what David wrote in Psalm 16, Peter said, "Seeing what was ahead,
he spoke of the resurrection of the Christ" (Acts 2:31). And in his
first letter Peter wrote, "Concerning this salvation, the prophets,
who spoke of the grace that was to come to you, searched intently
and with the greatest care, trying to find out the time and circum-
stances to which the Spirit of Christ in them was pointing when he
predicted the sufferings of Christ and the glories that would follow.
It was revealed to them that they were not serving themselves but
you, when they spoke of the things that have now been told you" (1
Even if one accepts the historical reliability of both Testaments
and the possibility of predictive prophecy, further questions present
themselves in the case of Psalm 22. First, are David's descriptions of
suffering limited to or extended beyond his own experience?
Though David was once threatened by stoning (1 Sam. 30:6), the
details of the experience he described in Psalm 22 do not literally
correspond to any one recorded incident in his life. It could be that
David described some unrecorded incident in his life. But that seems
highly unlikely. Such an incident would surely have been recorded,
given the stature of David in the Old Testament and the grave na-
ture of the experience he described.
A second view is that the descriptions that seem to go beyond
David's experience could be attributed to the use of figurative lan-
guage. He obviously used figurative language in the psalm. For ex-
ample he called himself a "worm" (v. 6), and he described his ene-
mies in figurative terms, comparing them to bulls, lions, and dogs.
And as noted above, it is often difficult to determine whether his de-
scriptions of suffering refer to emotional suffering, physical suffer-
ing, or both. In addition when one looks closely at the parts of the
first two sections of the psalm (vv. 1-21) in which David clearly
used language directly, that is, without figurative meaning, very
little seems to go beyond David's experience, as seen in the following
42 See Claus Westermann, The Psalms: Stricture, Content and Message, trans. R.
Gehrke (1967; reprint,
also Mays, "Prayer and Christology: Psalm 22 as Perspective on the Passion," pp. 322-
An Exposition of Psalm 22 301
"My God, my God, why have You forsaken me?" (v. 1).
"O my God, I cry out . . . and You do not answer . . . I have no rest" (v. 2).
"But You are holy" (v. 3).
"In You our fathers trusted; they trusted and You delivered them" (v. 4).
"To You they cried out, and were delivered; in You they trusted and
were not ashamed" (v. 5).
"But I am . . . despised by the people" (v. 6).
"All who see me mock me ... shaking their heads" (v. 7).
"Commit yourself to the LORD! Let Him rescue him--let Him deliver
him, since He delights in him" (v. 8).
"Do not be far from me, for trouble is near and there is no one to help"
"My tongue cleaves to my palate" (v. 15).
"A band of evildoers has encircled me (?]" (v. 16).
"They divide my garments among them and cast lots for my clothing [?]"
"But You, 0 LORD, be not far off ... come quickly to help me" (v. 19).
"Deliver my life . . . my only life" (v. 20).
"Rescue me . . . You have heard me" (v. 21).
In the listing above, only verses 16 and 18 remain to be dealt
with as containing phrases that still sound suspiciously beyond
David's actual historical experience. In this view one would say
that the piercing of David's hands and feet (v. 16) is a figure or that
the Masoretic Text rendering "like a lion" (a simile) is correct. The
casting of lots for David's clothing (v. 18) would also be seen as figu-
rative, perhaps indicating how completely his enemies had suc-
ceeded in defeating him.
This may be how the pre-Christian era hearers and readers took
David's words. He probably wrote this poetry to describe some ter-
rible suffering that he was experiencing, and the contemporary lis-
teners and readers probably attributed the discrepancy between his
descriptions and his experience to the use of figurative language.
But a third position could be taken, namely, that David's de-
scriptions do go beyond his own experience, even taking into account
figurative language. Taken figuratively, verse 16 is strange and ob-
scure. But taken from the New Testament perspective as prefigura-
tive language, the sentence is striking and enlightening. The same is
true of the reference to casting lots for clothing in verse 18. Further-
more David clearly transcended his own experience in the last sec-
tion of the psalm (vv. 22-31) when he implied in verses 27-31 that
all the earth will praise God for what He has done for him. There-
fore the possibility cannot be ruled out that David went beyond him-
self in the earlier verses.
A second question presents itself. Was David aware that he was
in some way prefiguring future events?
It may be that David was unaware (until v. 27, at least, where
he directly prophesied) of any prophetic aspect of his writing in
302 Bibliotheca Sacra / July-September 1990
Psalm 22. However, that seems highly unlikely, especially if one
holds to the view that his descriptions go beyond his own experi-
ence. As noted above, I Peter 1:10-12 seems to indicate that prophets
who predicted the sufferings of Christ were aware that they were
doing so. And Peter, in Acts 2:30-31, indicated that David was
aware that he was prophesying in another psalm, Psalm 16, when
he predicted the resurrection of Christ. Psalm 110:1, quoted in Acts
2:34-35 by Peter and by Jesus in the Gospels (Matt. 22:44; Mark 12:36;
Luke 20:42-43), is another clear example in which David knowingly
prophesied. If David was aware that God had spoken about his de-
scendants in the distant future (2 Sam. 7:19; Ps. 89:29, 36), and if on at
least two other occasions he had knowingly looked into the future of
his greatest descendant, the Messiah, then it seems likely that he
wrote with awareness in Psalm 22. As David wrote about, and be-
yond himself, he also wrote about "the sufferings of Christ and the
glories that would follow," and his seeming hyperbole prefigured Je-
sus' future reality.
Though David did prophesy in a sense, he did not directly pre-
dict the sufferings of Christ, but rather indirectly prefigured them as
a type. Typology, a subcategory of prophecy,43 is traditionally de-
fined as "the preordained representative relation which certain per-
sons, events, and institutions of the Old Testament bear to correspond-
ing persons, events, and institutions in the New."44 Because David
went beyond his own experience in Psalm 22, the typology there can
be seen as blending into direct prophecy. The existence of this "hy-
brid" sort of typology caused Delitzsch to create a special class of
psalms he called typico-prophetically Messianic, "in which David,
describing his outward and inward experiences--experiences even in
themselves typical--is carried beyond the limits of his individual-
ity ity and present condition, and utters concerning himself that which,
transcending human experience, is intended to become historically
true only in Christ."45 Though Delitzsch does not list examples of
this class of psalms, Psalm 22 may have been one he had in mind.
To sum up this section, David's descriptions of his own suffering
in this psalm closely correspond to what Jesus must have experienced
43 S. Lewis Johnson writes that predictiveness is a principal feature of typology (The
Old Testament in the New [
and J. Dwight Pentecost writes, "By its very nature a type is essentially prophetic in
character" (Things to Come [Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1958], p. 52).
44 Bernard Ramm, Protestant
Biblical Interpretation, 3d rev. ed. (
Baker Book House, 19; 0), pp. 227-28. Ramm quotes Milton S. Terry, who in turn quoted
45 F. Delitzsch,
The Psalms (1871; reprint,
An Exposition of Psalm 22 303
during His scourging and execution. What David wrote fits well
with the exhaustion, stretching, suffocation, and circulatory stop-
page that occur during crucifixion.46
It seems likely that David was conscious of speaking of the fu-
ture. And though it cannot be proven that his descriptions go beyond
his own experience, they are clearly hyperbolic in nature. Regard-
less of what position one holds on these matters, it is difficult to
deny that Psalm 22 contains one of the most striking and unique ex-
amples of typology in the Bible. The magnificent sovereignty of God
in ordering history and inspiring David to mirror the future in so
much detail, the trustworthiness of the Bible, and a strong witness to
the validity of Jesus' claims to be the Messiah are clearly displayed.
This typological aspect, of course, adds another dimension to the
meaning of the psalm. Jesus, as David's antitype, became the ulti-
mate example of trusting God in the face of trials. But in Jesus' case,
instead of being rescued, He was resurrected. Instead of sparing Jesus'
single life, God provided through Jesus' death a glorious resurrection
to new life for Him and for all who trust in Him. Also the event of
the crucifixion became the antitypical event in which the seemingly
exaggerated aspects of David's descriptions of his typical suffering
found their literal fulfillment. Likewise David's enemies are types
of the enemies of Christ. Those who mocked David prefigured the
mockers at Christ's crucifixion. The bulls, lions, and dogs also pre-
figured Jesus' enemies--the Jewish leaders who accused Him, the
Roman leaders who condemned Him, and the rabble who screamed,
Praise (vv. 22-31)
In this third major section David stated that having once again
experienced God's care in the midst of trials, he publicly praised
22 I will declare Your name to my brothers; in the midst of the assembly
I will praise You.
23 You who fear the LORD, praise Him; all you descendants of Jacob,
glorify Him, and revere
Him, all you descendants of
24 For He has not despised nor abhorred the affliction of the afflicted;
and He has not hidden His face from him; but when he cried to
Him, He heard.
25 From You comes my praise in the great assembly; I will fulfill my
46 See Bo Reicke, The New
Testament Era, trans. David E. Green (
Fortress Press, 1968), pp. 186-87; The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, ed.
G. W. Bromiley, 5 vols. (Grand Rapids: Wm B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1979), s.v.
"Cross," by D. G. Burke, 1:829-30; Josh McDowell, Evidence That Demands a Verdict
(San Bernardino, CA: Campus Crusade for Christ, 1972), pp. 172-73, 204-7.
304 Bibliotheca Sacra / July-September 1990
vows before those who fear Him.
26 The afflicted will eat and be satisfied; those who seek Him will praise
the LORD. May your heart live forever!
27 All the ends of the earth will remember and turn to the LORD, and all
the families of the nations will bow down before Him.
28 For the kingdom is the LORD's, and He rules over the nations.
29 All the prosperous ones of the earth will eat and bow down; all who go
down to the dust will kneel before Him--those who cannot keep
30 A seed shall serve Him; future generations will be told about the
31 They will come and declare His righteousness to a people who will be
born, that He has done it.
PRAISED GOD AND EXHORTED THE GOD-FEARERS IN
THE SAME (vv. 22-26)
David now added his praise (llahA appears four times in vv. 22-
to the "praises of
verse 6, had not despised him, but instead had heard his cry.47
David told God that he would publicly praise Him (v. 22). As
previously mentioned, the writer to the Hebrews quoted verse 22 in
Hebrews 2:12 as the words of the Messiah, establishing that his
a view of the psalm was also messianic. He further explained in He-
brews 2:10-11 that the "brethren" of Psalm 22:22 are those who have
received salvation. It is fellow-believers David now addressed as
my brothers, "you who fear the Lord, those who fear Him, and
"those who seek Him." Whereas he was surrounded before by a band
of evildoers, now he was surrounded by an assembly of those who
fear God. Just as the total absence of sympathizers in the first part
of the psalm emphasized David's wretched aloneness, now the ab-
sence of the evildoers and the oft-mentioned presence of his brethren
emphasizes the blessed fellowship he now experienced as part of
the assembly of the God-fearers.
David exhorted his fellow God-fearers to praise God because He
had heard David's cry for help (vv. 23-24).48 Verse 23 makes it clear
that it is specifically believing Israelites to whom David was
47 Ridderbos points out that the carry-over of themes through the repetition of vo-
cabulary establishes a close connection between verses 22-31 and the first two-thirds
of the psalm (Die Psalmen, p. 190). He mentions these instances: llh ("praise," vv. 22-
26) from tvlht "the praises of," v. 3); hzb xlo ("not despised," v. 24) from Mf yvzb
("despised of the people," v. 6); plus homonymic repetition of fvw in verse 1 (ytfvwym
"from saving me") and verse 24 (vfvwbv "he cried") and polysemantic repetition of
[h] rpsx in verse 17 ("I can count") and verse 22 ("I will declare").
48 Up to this point David addressed only God. He addressed God again in verse 25,
but in the bulk of the rest of the psalm he addressed the assembly, with possible li-
turgical participation by them (see esp. v. 24, where both God and the psalmist are re-
ferred to in the third person).
An Exposition of Psalm 22 305
declaring God's name and whom he now exhorted to praise (as op-
posed to the Gentiles of whom he would speak in verses 27-31).49 An-
derson writes, "Yahweh's saving work, even if it concerns primarily
the individual, is not a private matter; it is relevant not only to the
person concerned, but also to the whole congregation."50 The three-
fold parallel structure of this verse (praise Him/glorify Him/revere
Him) shows the depth of feeling behind this call to praise.
David now praised God, because the Lord had heard his cry. For
him, the recognition of an answer and the opportunity to praise came
while he was still living on earth. But this psalm teaches that
sometimes, as with David's antitype, Jesus Christ, God's timing and
procedure will mean that man's opportunity to praise will occur only
in the life to come. Believers are sometimes called on to trust that
God has heard them even though it seems as if He is silent. Their
solace is that He is not limited to earthly time and solutions.
The causal yKi plus the double length (six words) of the opening
line of verse 24 coupled with the threefold structure of the three syn-
thetically parallel lines serves to emphasize this verse, which, as
previously mentioned, summarizes the message of the psalm: God
hears the cry of the afflicted. It is important to point out that the
"afflicted" here refers to David, who used the same term in verse 26
to refer (implied through the synthetic parallelism of that verse) to
those who "seek Him." Therefore the assembly of the believers
could also be called the assembly of the afflicted ones (cf. Pss. 10;
14:6; 102). This fits perfectly with the concept that believers share
in the sufferings of Christ at the hands of the unbelieving world
(e.g., "the fellowship of sharing in his sufferings," Phil. 3:10, and
"you participate in the sufferings of Christ," 1 Pet. 4:13).
David told God that He was David's source of praise and he
promised to fulfill his vows publicly (v. 25). David turned back
again to God and declared that as the Giver of deliverance He was
both source and object of David's praise.51 The vows referred to in
this verse probably relate to the thank-offering mentioned in Leviti-
cus 7:11-13. Kidner writes, "The law encouraged those who vowed
some service to God, should their prayer be granted, to fulfil the vow
with a sacrifice, followed by a feast (26) which might last as long as
two days (Lev. 7:16)."52
49 The word translated "descendants" is literally "seed" (fraz,) which is repeated in
verse 30, producing distant parallelism that helps bind verses 22-31 together struc-
turally. See note 2.
51 Perowne, The Book of Psalms, p. 244.
52 Kidner, Psalms 1-72, p. 108.
306 Bibliotheca Sacra / July-September 1990
David encouraged his fellow God-fearers by predicting that
they too would be blessed (v. 26). Here it seems as if David once
again addressed the assembly, since "the Lord" is in the third per-
son. He continued the thanksgiving meal image, picturing his fel-
low-believers ("those who fear Him," v. 25, and "the afflicted," v.
26) as his guests. They will eat, be satisfied, and praise God, said
David. "May your heart live forever!" is taken as the psalmist's
blessing on his guests.53 A similar expression is found in Psalm 69:32,
"The poor will see and be glad--you who seek God, may your hearts
live!" There the meaning is something like, "May you be inwardly
revived!" It is notable that in Psalm 22:26 the word "forever" is
added, giving a permanent or eternal dimension to the blessing. From
the New Testament perspective, the antitype, Jesus Christ, invites
believers to His banquet table and gives them an eternal blessing.54
The ultimate meaning of the idea that God hears the cry of the af-
flicted (v. 24) is that He has provided Jesus to be their source of eter-
nal salvation. Hebrews 5:7-9 says: "During the days of Jesus' life on
earth, he offered up prayers and petitions with loud cries and tears
to the one who could save him from death, and he was heard because
of his reverent submission. Although he was a son, he learned obedi-
ence from what he suffered and, once made perfect, he became a
source of eternal salvation for all who obey him."
DAVID PREDICTED THAT ALL NATIONS IN THE FUTURE WILL PRAISE GOD
David predicted that all nations will someday turn to God and
worship Him (vv. 27-29). Kidner writes, "Now David's language
overflows all its natural banks."55 David was truly a great king, and
his impact on history is great, but the rescue of an earthly king
would not result in the dominion of God over the whole earth and the
enlistment of posterity for the purpose of proclaiming His righteous-
ness to future generations. The last five verses make sense only in the
light of the consequences proceeding from the death and resurrection
of Jesus Christ.
"All" is repeated four times in these verses. All nations (now
the Gentiles come into the picture) in the whole earth will turn to
the Lord and worship Him. This refers to that future time of which
Isaiah wrote, "For the earth will be full of the knowledge of the
53 Delitzsch, The Psalms, p. 324.
54 The figure of the banquet is elsewhere used to picture the joy of participation in
the blessings of God and especially those of the messianic kingdom (cf. Ps. 23:5; Isa.
25:6; Matt. 8:11; Rev. 3:20).
55 Kidner, Psalms 1-72, p. 109.
An Exposition of Psalm 22 307
Lord as the waters cover the sea. In that day the Root of Jesse will
stand as a banner for the peoples; the nations will rally to him" (Isa.
11:9-10).56 Having just sung of the joys of the salvation Christ has
won for all believers, David now spoke of the glories of His future
dominion over all the earth. The idea of all the nations of the world
worshiping the Lord is stated twice in verse 27, and the idea of God's
dominion over them is stated twice in verse 28. This hits both sides
of the relationship twice and thus emphasizes God's complete do-
minion in the strongest possible way.
In keeping with this idea that all people will worship God,
verse 29 returns to the figure of the banquet of verse 26. David wrote
that all the "prosperous ones" (lit., "fat ones") of the earth will eat
and worship, and all the perishing ("all who go down to the dust . . .
those who cannot keep themselves alive") will kneel before the
Lord.57 Of whom did David write here?
Most commentators hold that the contrast here is between the
prosperous and the poor.58 It is probable that David was utilizing
the poetic technique of merism. That is, the extremes of prosperity
and poverty are meant to communicate the idea that everyone, re-
gardless of socioeconomic status, will someday bow before God.59
David predicted that future generations will proclaim to suc-
ceeding generations what God has done (vv. 30-31). Finally David
saw "a seed" (posterity) serving God, whose task is to proclaim the
righteousness of the Lord to future generations, who in turn will tell
56 Exactly when and where in the future any given interpreter believes this will
happen depends on his eschatology. This writer takes the premillennial position
that these passages refer to the time of the millennium, the 1,000-year earthly reign
of Christ referred to in Revelation 20:1-6.
57 Some commentators, feeling that the meaning of the last phrase of verse 29 is ob-
scure, join it to the first line of verse 30, with the result: "As for him that could not
keep his soul alive, [his] seed shall serve Him" (Cohen, The Psalms, p. 66). However,
this change seems to create a new problem, since it is not clear how proclaiming the
Lord's righteousness to future generations is a form of service to those that have
passed on; such activity is clearly, however, a service to the Lord.
58 E.g., Perowne, The Book of
Psalms, p. 244.
and Craigie (Psalms 1-50, p. 197) feel the verse is obscure and emend the text to read
"those who sleep" (ynwy) instead of "fat ones" (ynwd) to provide a parallel to "those who
go down" in the following clause, but this has no manuscript support. Dahood comes up
with a similar emendation (Psalms I, 1-50, p. 143).
59 This commends itself as the simplest solution. A second possible interpretation is
that the idea of "the quick and the dead" is meant to be communicated. Kirkpatrick
likes this option of the physically living versus the dead but considers the idea (the
quick and the dead bowing in homage before the universal sovereign) "foreign to the
O.T." (The Book of Psalms, p. 123). In answer to this objection, however, it should be
remembered that David was speaking here about the future, and so the context is one
in which the presentation of new concepts could be expected. This idea is not foreign to
the New Testament picture of the future.
308 Bibliotheca Sacra / July-September 1990
generations beyond them. This is reminiscent of what Isaiah wrote
in Isaiah 12:4-5: "In that day you will say: 'Give thanks to the LORD,
call on his name; make known among the nations what he has done,
and proclaim that his name is exalted. Sing to the LORD, for he has
done glorious things; let this be known to all the world."' The two-
word colon at the end of Psalm 22:31 ("that He has done it") makes a
dramatic conclusion reminiscent of Jesus' words on the cross: "It is fin-
ished" (John 19:30). What has Jesus done? At the cross He accom-
plished the greatest victory in the history of the world. Having de-
feated sin, death, and Satan, He offers mankind the gift of eternal
life through faith in Jesus Christ.
Despite his feelings of being forsaken by God and man, David
drew encouragement from God's past record of faithfulness. And de-
spite his terrible sufferings at the hands of his enemies, he kept
praying, and he ultimately found that God had heard his cries for
help. As David's antitype, Jesus is the prime example of this kind of
persevering faith. The lesson comes through clearly that God hears
the prayers of the faithful and answers according to His own perfect
plan. In Jesus' case, God's answer took a totally unexpected form; in-
stead of being rescued, He was resurrected. Instead of sparing Jesus'
single life, God purchased through Jesus' death a glorious resurrec-
tion to new life for all who trust in Him. Likewise God's answers to
believer's prayers may not be perceived by them till they enter the
life to come. But then all their sorrows will be swallowed up in the
joy of His presence and the recognition of His dealing with them in
His perfect wisdom.
This material is cited with gracious permission from:
Please report any errors to Ted