Bibliotheca Sacra 42 (1885) 201-24.

                                                   Public Domain

 

 

                                                    ARTICLE I.

 

CREATION; OR, THE BIBLICAL COSMOGONY

        IN THE LIGHT OF MODERN SCIENCE.1

 

   BY JAMES D. DANA, LL.D., SILLIMAN PROFESSOR OF GEOLOGY AND

                                         MINERALOGY, YALE COLLEGE.

 

            THE grand history of creation with which the Bible

opens is thrown into the region of myths or dreams by

two classes of writers: the scientific, who know the many

positive scientific errors in the accepted interpretation,

and see no method of harmonizing the two diverse

records; the exegetical, who hold that exegesis alone

should determine the meaning of the chapter.

            One such short-sighted exegete, for example, referring

to Professor Guyot's recent work, seeks to enforce his

various objections by such remarks as the following:

"Biblical interpretation is older far than geology"!

"Skill and knowledge in the physical sciences by no

means necessarily involve skill and knowledge in the

science of interpretation." "A man may have consider-

able knowledge about terminal moraines, and little or no

such knowledge about the origin, history, and diction of

 

   1 Creation ; or, the Biblical Cosmogony in the Light of Modern Science.

By Arnold Guyot, LL.D., Blair Professor of Geology and Physical Geogra-

phy in the College of New Jersey. pp. 140. 12mo. New York: Charles

Scribner's Sons. 1884.

     [For Professor Dana's former statements of his views upon this subject,

see articles by him in BIBLIOTIIECA SACRA, vol. xiii. (1856) pp. 80-130,

631-655, and vol. xiv. (1857) pp. 338-413, 460-525, and 854-874.--EDS.]

            VOL. XLII. NO. 166.-APRIL, 1885.     14

 



204                             Creation.        [April,

 

mogony, and that the brief review of the majestic march

of events before man makes a wonderfully befitting pre-

lude to God's message of law and love to man, constitu-

ting the Bible.

            I do not mean to say that Professor Guyot's views as to

the interpretation, or as to the meaning of the Hebrew

words in which the oldest form of the document appears,

are in every case beyond question. But I do claim for them

the first place among all the interpretations that have

been offered. It is now thirty-five years since Professor

Guyot, two years after his arrival in America, gave me,

at my house one evening, his views on the first chapter of

Genesis. I listened to his interpretations of the successive

verses with increasing interest to the end, and with in-

creasing admiration and affection for the earnest, simple-

minded, and learned Christian. Professor Guyot took up

the subject after years of training in biblical as well as

natural science, and pursued it with deep and honest,

searchings for the truth, believing both in the Bible and

in Nature, and in the inspiration and truth of the first

chapter of the Bible.

            For convenience of reference I here insert

 

                        THE COSMOGONY OF GENESIS.1

 

            CHAP. I.-1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

   2 And the earth was waste and void; and darkness was upon the face of the

deep. And the Spirit of God brooded upon the face of the waters.

   3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. 4 And God saw

the light, that it was good : and God divided the light from the darkness.

  5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And

there was evening and there was morning, day first.

   6 And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and

let it divide the waters from the waters:  7And God made the firmament,

and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters

which were above the firmament : and it was so. 8 And God called the

firmament Heaven. And there was evening and there was morning, day

second.

 

  1 The few variations from the Authorized Version have been made by

Professor Wm. G. Ballantine.

 



1885.]                         Dana:  Creation.                                 205

 

 

   9 And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together

unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so. 10 And God

called the dry land Earth ; and the gathering together of the waters called he

Seas : and God saw that it was good. 11 And God said, Let the earth bring

forth grass; the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his

kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth : and it was so. 12 And the

earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree

yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it

was good. 13 And there was evening and there was morning, day third.

   14 And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to

divide the day from the night ; and let them be for signs, and for seasons,

and for days, and years : 15 and let them be for lights in the firmament of

the heaven to give light upon the earth : and it was so. 16 And God made

the two great lights ; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light

to rule the night : he made the stars also. 17 And God set them in the firma-

ment of the heaven to give light upon the earth, 18 and to rule over the day and

over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness : and God saw that it was

good. 19 And there was morning and there was evening, day fourth.

   20 And God said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving

creature that hath life, and let fowl fly above the earth in the open firma-

ment of heaven. 21 And God created the great sea monsters, and every

living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly,

after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind : and God saw that it

was good. 22 And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and

fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth. 23 And there

was evening and there was morning, day fifth.

   24 And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his

kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind : and

it was so. 25 And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle

after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind

and God saw that it was good.

   26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and

let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the

air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping

thing that creepeth upon the earth. 27 So God created man in his own

image, in the image of God created he him ; male and female created he

them. 28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and

multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over

the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing

that moveth upon the earth.

   29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed,

which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the

fruit of a tree yielding seed ; to you it shall be for meat. 30 And to every

beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that

creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb



206                                         Dana:  Creation.                                 [April,

 

for meat: and it was so.  31 And God saw every thin; that he had made,

and, behold, it was very good. And there was evening and there was

morning, day the sixth.

     CHAP. II.-1 Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the

host of them. 2 And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had

made ; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had

made. 3 And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that

in it he had rested from all his work which God created and made.

 

In the following pages I briefly review and explain

Professor Guyot's interpretation, without following pre-

cisely the order in his work, adding in some parts other,

thoughts of his from our many conversations, where they

could aid in the illustration of the subject-thoughts which,

with more leisure than was afforded him in the few last

weeks of his life, he would probably have brought into

his volume. Where we differ on any point I make men-

tion of it. I have also here and there added an argument

in support of his views.

I. In approaching the subject we have to recognize

the fact that man's comprehension of any idea communi-

cated by another is limited by the amount and character

of his knowledge and beliefs, and that the interpretation

of the terms employed in the communication would be

determined thereby. For example, the idea of space

about the earth would necessarily take shape in the mind

as that of a solid firmament with men who never had any

other idea on the subject, even if the author imparting

the idea were divine. The idea of fluid in space, whether

liquid or gaseous, would become that of waters to those

who already believed in the "waters above the heavens."

(See 148th Psalm, from which Professor Guyot makes a

citation. The general expression "plants means to ordi-

nary men ordinary plants, such as are everywhere in

view; and only to one, educated in science or philosophy

are the essential attributes of a plant present in the sim-

plest of the species. Accordingly, the terms or words by

which the ideas in the Bible cosmogony are expressed

must necessarily, although these ideas were divinely com-

 



1885.]                                     Dana:  Creation.                                 207

 

municated, bear some impress of want of knowledge or

comprehension. This important psychological fact is not

referred to by Professor Guyot. My attention was drawn

to it nearly thirty years since by the eminent theologian

of New England, Dr. Nathaniel W. Taylor.

I suppose it to be far from certain that Moses was the

inspired man who received from God the record of his

creative works. It seems probable that the record was a

chapter of sacred truth among men long before his time,

and that it was the source of the early monotheism of the

world, and of some of the cosmogonic ideas associated

with this belief.

II. The brief review of creation in Genesis sets forth

only the grand stages of progress in the creative work,

or those great events that marked epochs in the history.

Such it should have been if written by a man of supreme

intelligence and exalted philosophy, and such it must be

if God is the author. The number of these epochs in the

account is eight. A method of interpretation that puts

among the eight an event not of this epochal character

should, therefore, be received with doubt.

III. System under law pervades God's works, and the

discovery of it is one great end of all philosophic study of

nature.  Professor Guyot looked for system in the arrange-

ment of the Mosaic record, as well as in the relations of

the works themselves; and the result he reached is in

itself profound testimony to its divine origin.

Of the six days of Genesis, the first three are like the

last three in having light as the work of the first of the

three days, and in having two great works on the last of

the three. There is, thus, a parallelism in movement

between the two halves, or the first and second triads.

On the first day, the light was the light of the universe,

dependent on the constitution of matter; on the fourth

day, the first of the second triad, it is light from the sun,

moon, and stars to the earth.

Further: the first triad included the events connected

 



208                                         Dana:  Creation.                                 [April,

 

with the inorganic history of the earth, the last of which,

on the third clay, was the arrangement of the lands and

seas; the second triad was occupied with the events of the

organic history, from the creation of the first animals to

man.

Further: the third day, or last of the first triad, ends

with the creation of plants, as its second great work, or

the introduction of the new element, life, which was to be

the chief feature of the progress during the succeeding

era; and on the sixth day, the last of the second triad, the,

second great work is the creation of man, a being made

"in the image of God," and destined through his spiritual

nature to immortal progress.

This system in the divine record is not a figment of the

student's fancy. It is a fact; a fact that displays purpose

in the author of the document, and knowledge beyond

that of ancient or any time, and philosophy more than

human.

IV. The first verse of the chapter, besides proclaiming

God the creator of the " heavens and the earth," teaches tfrat

the beginning of the heavens and the earth was the begin-

ning of the existing universe. The words imply that the,

heavens and the earth began to exist in some state or con-

dition; which condition, as regards the earth, was one

waste and void," or, as another translator writes it

"formless and naught."

The actual condition is partly indicated by the work of

the first day, "Let light be, and light was." The light

was the first light of the universe. The phenomena of

light have been proved to be a result of molecular action,

and to be dependent upon fundamental qualities of matter

as now constituted. Man has ascertained the wave-lengths

in the vibration of molecular force corresponding to light

of different parts of the spectrum, and also other laws of

light. He has found, moreover, that the laws of heat

and of electrical and chemical action are so involved with

those of light that all these conditions are convertible and

 



1885.]                         Dana:  Creation.                                             209

 

one in molecular origin. The fiat "Let light be" was,

consequently, the beginning of light, heat, and electrical

and chemical action in matter, which matter till then was

inert; the beginning of laws of action which have since

remained unchanged; the beginning of the activity which

led to chemical combinations, and later to systems of

worlds, to suns and to planets; the beginning, therefore,

of "the Generations of the Heavens," or of the develop-

ment of the universe.

The physical facts with regard to light--which, it

should be noted, are not modern facts, but as old as the

first creative day thus prove to us that the "waters,"

upon the face of which the Spirit of God moved when

the fiat of the first day went forth, were not literally

waters, whatever the strict meaning of the Hebrew word;

nor was "the earth" a defined sphere in space.

V. The word day in the chapter, with the accompany-

ing expression, evening and morning, is a stumbling-block

to many. The ordinary exegete finds only 24-hour days,

and stands to it that the earth in its revolution was the

timepiece then in use. Professor Guyot concludes from

the five: different uses of the word "day" in the narrative,

and the fact that it is employed for three days before

there was a sun to divide the day front the night (an argu-

ment which others have used), that the earth's day of

twenty-four hours may not be, and cannot be, the day of

Genesis ; and, hence, that the days were unlimited periods

--time of whatever length the work in each case re-

quired; and that the expression "evening and morning"

indicates, by a familiar metaphor, the beginning and con-

summation of each work. If, as is now clear, the Genesis

is an account of the creation of the universe, days of

twenty-four hours, measured off by the revolving earth,

can have no place, in the history. Moreover, it is hardly

possible that Moses, who wrote, "A thousand years in thy

sight are but as yesterday when it is past," and, "Before

the mountains were brought forth, or ever thou hadst

 



210                             Dana:  Creation.                                 [April,

 

formed the earth and the world, even from everlasting to

everlasting, thou art God," entertained so belittling an

idea of the Creator and his work. Before the first day

there was no literal evening; there was darkness; and then,

as the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters, at

the fiat, there was light. The succession was "evening

and morning," a beginning and a consummation of the

great work.

VI. The dividing of the waters from the waters by a

firmament is the recorded work of the second day. The

beginning of activity in matter took place on the first or

preceding clay; the appearance over the earth of dry land

amid the gathered waters was to be the work of the third

or following day. The historical event of chief impor

tance between the two was the making of the earth.

This division of the "waters from the waters" has usu-

ally been interpreted as a separation, by an expanse or

firmament, of waters of the earth's surface from the

waters, that is, the clouds, above; or, of the earth's molten

surface from the clouds. Such an event is too trivia? for

a place among the eight great works, and also is out of

place on the second day. It accomplished nothing, for it

left the earth under its swaddling-band of clouds. The

events of the first and third days help us to understand

that of the second or intervening day.

On the first day, matter was endowed with force: The

next great event was the making of the universe thus begun;

it was the dividing-up of this now active matter, diffused

through the immensity of space; the subdividing and

arranging of it, until the system of the universe had been

developed, and ultimately the earth had become a defined

sphere, with the "heavens of heavens," or a great expanse,

around it.  The words describe sufficiently well such a

division of the " waters from the waters"; or, perhaps,

more strictly, the final result, the earth separated from

the diffused matter of space in which, on the first clay, it

was still involved. By the fiat, the rotation of matter in

 



1887.]                         Dana:  Creation.                                 211

 

space was begun (if this was not part of the work of the

first clay), and the system of the universe was carried for-

ward. The earth, though thus defined, was still an unfin-

ished earth.

It matters little what may be the literal meaning of the

word translated "firmament." Although regarded gen-

erally among the Jews as signifying a solid firmament, it

is far from certain that Moses, who was versed in all

Egyptian learning, so considered it.1  Professor Guyot

quotes from verse twentieth of the narrative the expres-

sion, "fowl that may fly above the earth in the open

firmament," as evidence on this point.

VII. The gathering together of the waters into one

place, called seas, and, thereby, the appearing of the dry

land, was the work of the first half of the third day. After

the defining of the earth in the solar system--at first, no

doubt, a liquid sphere--slow cooling and consolidation

went on and, finally, the condensation of the larger part

of the enveloping vapors took place, covering the sphere

with water. Still later, the waters were gathered into

one place and the dry land appeared, thus determining

the arrangements of the surface, and making the sphere

ready for living species. With this finishing event the

inorganic history of the the earth was brought to an end.

Geological readings reach back to this period of the

first dry land--that of the so-called Archaean era, the

geography of which era is now pretty well understood.

Of the earth in its molten state the science has no facts

from observed rocks, and derives its conclusions and con-

jectures mostly from facts and general principles in chem-

ical and physical science.

VIII. The second fiat of the third day commences

with the words, "Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb

 

Professor Guyot places the actual defining of the earth under the work

of the third day, instead of with that of the second day, as above. The

order and character of the events are the same in the two methods of

arrangement.

 



212                             Dana:  Creation.                                 [April,

 

yielding seed, and the fruit-tree yielding fruit." In the

expressions, "yielding seed," "having seed in itself," the

words describe, with wonderful precision, as Professor

Guyot observes, the characteristic of a living species,

distinguishing it from mineral hr inorganic substances.

Beings having powers of growth and reproduction were

now facts, and this was the great creation. These powers

are exhibited in the simplest plants; and hence the new

creation was in an important sense complete, although

represented at first only by the lower tribes of plants.

Obedience to the fiat, "Let the earth bring forth," con-

tinued in after time; new and higher species coming forth

in succession, and ordinary fruit-trees not until the later

part of geological time, long after the Coal period..

With reference to the introduction of life, science has

no explanation; for no experiments have resulted, in mak-

ing from dead matter a living species. We can only say,

"God created." The growing plant is on a higher level

than that of ordinary molecular law; for it controls and

subordinates to itself chemical forces, and thereby is ena-

bled to make out of mineral matter chemical compounds

and living structures which the forces without this con-

trol are incapable of. Only when growth ceases, and

death consequently ensues, does ordinary chemical law

regain control, and then decomposition commences. More

than this, the living being, before it dies, produces germs

which develop into other like forms, with like powers;

and thus cycles of growth are continued indefinitely. In

making its tissues, the living plant is storing force for the

sustenance and purposes of beings of a still higher grade

--those of the animal kingdom ; beings that cannot live on

mineral materials. There is, hence, reason for believing that

the power which so controls and exalts chemical forces,

raising them to the level required by the functions of a

plant, cannot come from unaided chemical forces; and

much less that which carries them to a still higher level,

--that of the living, sentient animal.

 



1885.]                         Creation.                                            213

 

In the Bible record, the creation of plants preceded that

of animals; and this order is sustained by facts from

nature. For the reason just stated, the plant, as Guyot

says, "is the indispensable basis of all animal life." Fur-

ther, the lower species of plants are capable of existing

in waters hotter than animals can endure; and, therefore,

the condition of the waters of the globe would have

suited them very long before they were fitted for animal

life; very long, because diminution in temperature must

have gone on with extreme slowness.

Professor Guyot observes, further, that, since vegeta-

tion uses the animal-destroying gas, carbonic acid, as a

means of growth, it served to purify the ancient waters

and air, and, hence, was a befitting part of the inorganic

division of the history. He also well says that the living

principle fundamental to the plant was prophetic of a

higher organic, era beyond, that of animal life.

Distinct remains of plants have not yet been found in

Archaean rocks. These rocks have been so changed by

heat that relics of plants would have been obliterated or

obscured, had they existed. Some of the rocks contain

great quantities of graphite, or black lead, a variety of

carbon that in some cases (as in Carboniferous slates in

Rhode Island, and at Worcester, Mass.) has resulted from

the action of heat on coal beds. The graphite which is

common in the Archaean rocks of Canada is regarded by

many as evidence that Archaean time had marine plants in

great abundance.

IX. On the fourth day, "God said, Let there be lights

in the firmament of heaven." In a subsequent sentence, the

words are: " made the two great lights," "the stars also."

But the purpose of the lights is set forth in detail in each

of the five verses relating to the day's work: "to divide

the day from the night"; to be "for signs, and for seasons,

and for days, and years"; "to give light upon the

earth"; to rule over the day, and over the night "; "to

divide the light from the darkness"; "the greater light

 



214                             Dana:  Creation.                                 [April,

 

to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night."

The great purpose of the sources of light was, therefore,

accomplished by them, whether they were "made" or

made to appear. It was fully accomplished when the sun

became to the earth the actual source of day and night

and seasons, and that would have been when it first shone

through the earth's long-existing envelope of clouds.

Professor Guyot speaks of this envelope as consisting of

electrically lighted vapor, and calls it a photosphere,

resembling, in some respects, that now about the sun; and

he observes that the sun, moon, and stars became visible

only after its disappearance. The modern "Aurora" is

a result of electric disturbances over the present cold

sphere; and there can be no doubt of the vastly greater

intensity of such disturbances during the period of the

earth's cooling. But, whatever the fact as to the electric

light about the earth when the temperature had greatly

diminished, there is no doubt that the envelope of clouds

was of long continuance, and that the time was slowly but

finally reached when the earth was free from it. One of

the sublimest passages in literature is the reference to the

work of the third day in creation, contained in God's

answer to Job "out of the whirlwind " (chapter xxxviii.);

and, although often quoted, it may well be introduced

here