Criswell Theological Review 2.1 (1987) 39-61

[Copyright © 1987 by Criswell College, cited with permission;

digitally prepared for use at Gordon and Criswell Colleges and elsewhere]

 

 

THE SUBTLE CRISES

OF SECULARISM: PREACHING

THE BURDEN OF ISRAEL

 

 

C. RICHARD WELLS

Criswell College, Dallas, TX 75201

 

The path from the "then" of biblical exegesis to the "now" of

biblical preaching always proceeds between borders. On one side

are the times, on the other, timeless principles. The contemporary

preacher must negotiate the path so as to bring the truly universal

teaching of Scripture to bear on conditions similar in some significant

ways to those addressed in Scripture. The path is strewn with debris

from earlier (and sometimes careless) travellers. And we must be sure

we actually remain on the path, lest we find ourselves digressing along

an overgrown trail that leads to a place where nobody lives.

Our plan for this article is to point out some of the significant

landmarks that lie on the path from the prophet Malachi to a genera-

tion approaching the last decade of a phenomenal century. We will

work in two ways. First, we will attempt to mark the path in broad

outline. We will suggest: (a) parallels between the conditions of Mala-

chi's age and those of our own; and (b) major theological themes

addressed to Malachi's audience; and, by application, to us. Second,

we will attempt to develop a preaching program from Malachi.

 

I. A Practical Theology of Malachi

 

Malachi and the Malaise of Israel

 

Most scholars agree that Malachi was written sometime during

the last half of the 5th century B.C. The reader will find extensive

introductory material elsewhere in this Review. The critical point here

is that Malachi's prophecy appears within a strategic nexus of social

and religious realities.

 



40                    CRISWELL THEOLOGICAL REVIEW

 

The Social Realities. Just as there were three deportations to

Babylon, there were three returns to Palestine. Zerubbabel returned

with a group of exiles in 536 B.C. After some delay (cf. Haggai and

Zechariah), the people completed the Second Temple in 516 B.C. In

458 B.C., Ezra the Scribe returned with a second group, and labored to

restore the knowledge of the Law (Ezra 7:14, 25-26). In 455 B.C.,

Nehemiah came with a third group. Under his twelve-year governor-

ship, the walls of Jerusalem were rebuilt, and numerous reforms

inaugurated (Neh 5:1-13; 13:7-27). If we assume that Malachi dates

from a period following Nehemiah's brief return to Persia (433 B.C.),

then the setting for his ministry is about one century after the end of

the Exile.

During this century of gradual return to the land, several impor-

tant changes occurred in the political environment of Israel. First, the

balance of power in the Near East began to shift from Persia west-

ward toward Greece. The Persians lost the historic Battle of Marathon

in August, 490 B.C. Ten years later they defeated the Spartans at

Thermophylae and briefly occupied Athens; but, Xerxes himself

watched his navy defeated at Salamis in the same year. From that

point on, the Persian government became less and less efficient, and

more and more corrupt and weak, an unnerving experience for Israel.

Second, the people who filled the void left by the deportations

continually frustrated the returning exiles. They evidently taxed the

Jews (Neh 5:4), a burden that lay on top of that imposed by Persia

itself. Some had to borrow money just to buy food and pay taxes

(Neh 5:14-15). These neighbors accused them to the central govern-

ment of Persia (Ezra 4:6; 4:7-23), and physically opposed their work,

so that it had to be done in shifts, with half the men working and half

standing guard (Neh 4:16-18).

The pragmatic realities which awaited the exiles may have proved

more distressing than the political. The situation in Jerusalem was

bleak. The extensive ruins (Neh 4:10), and the inferiority of the

project compared to those of the more glorious past (Ezra 3:12; Hag

2:3), diminished whatever initial enthusiasm may have existed. And

the prospects for a better life seemed no better now. Small wonder

that few in Babylon wanted to return to Israel. Many had grown

accustomed to life there, many knew no other life, and some had

prospered.

The Religious Realities. The greatest difficulty for Israel lay,

however, in what the Exile and subsequent events did to her identity.

The shattering experience of the Exile raised many questions about

Israel as the people of God. But the post-Exile raised these questions



Wells: THE SUBTLE CRISES OF SECULARISM                        41

 

in a new way. In the Exile, Israel wondered about the justice of God

in the face of catastrophe. Now she wondered about the presence of

God in the face of life!

Furthermore, the Exile had the advantage of being a trauma.

Traumata summon the reserves of the human spirit. They tend to

purify, to strengthen, even to ennoble. The post-Exile was not trauma;

but, to use the popular description of America's last decade, a "mal-

aise." As G. A. Smith put it, the Jews of Malachi's age were "denied

the stimulus, the purgation, the glory of a great persecution." Instead,

they were "severely left to themselves and to the petty hostilities of

their neighbors."1

Theologically and pragmatically, these were hard realities. After

all, the Jews had returned. They had returned to Yahweh from their

idols. They had returned to Israel from Babylon. They had returned

to build the Temple and the holy city out of its ruin. They had

returned to re-institute the true worship of the true God. It is in this

context of "obedience" that the crisis of God's presence develops.

Once again, Smith is helpful:

 

[The Jews] entered the period, it is true, with some sense of their

distinction. In exile they had suffered God's anger, and had been purged

by it. But out of discipline often springs pride. . . . The tide of hope,

which rose to flood with [the completion of the Temple], ebbed rapidly

away, and left God's people struggling, like any ordinary tribe of peas-

ants, with bad seasons and the cruelty of their envious neighbors. Their

pride was set on edge. . . . 2

 

This generation had done the "right things," but God had not re-

ponded in kind.

 

Malachi and the Crisis in Israel

 

T. V. Moore pointed out in the last century that whereas "before

the captivity the besetting sins of the Jews were idolatry and supersti-

tion," after the Exile "they were prone to the other extremes of

practical atheism and Epicureanism."3  Israel had indeed lost her dis-

tinctiveness. Out of disappointment and difficulty, she had lost any

sense of the nearness, the power, the glory, the relevance of God. The

irony is that she had thus become essentially pagan--"secularized,"

 

1 G. A. Smith, The Book of the Twelve Prophets (2 vols; New York: George H,

Doran, n.d.) 2.342.

2 Ibid.,  2.342-43.

3 T. V. Moore, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi (1856, reprinted; Philadelphia: Banner

of Truth, 1979) 350.



42                    CRISWELL THEOLOGICAL REVIEW

 

we might say. In her complaint that her faith did not get her any

advantages, she abdicated her faith. She joined secular culture, then

complained that God did not care! R. Braun puts it finely: "through

[Malachi] God spoke his word to a people sadly disappointed with

the course of events in their time and sorely tempted to give up their

religion as an irrelevant relic from the past."4

The Subtle Crisis of Secularism. Malachi's opening word re-

flects the extraordinary seriousness of this condition. Massa' ("a bur-

den") is rare in the prophets: "It never occurs in the title except when

it is evidently grave and full of weight and labor."5 The "burden"

belongs to Israel: "An oracle (massa): The word of the Lord to Israel.

through Malachi" (1:1). The prophet lays before Israel the reality of a

crisis6 which involves at least three elements.

First, it constitutes a subtle accomodation to the prevailing cul-

ture. G. Campbell Morgan points out in his fine little devotional

commentary that the character of the people was bound up in their

continued defense "wherein?" "Wherein hast Thou loved us," they

asked (1:2), or "despised Thy name" (1:6) and so forth (1:7; 2:17; 3:7;

3:8; 3:13):

They have been boasting themselves in their knowledge of truth, re-

sponding to that knowledge mechanically, technically; .  . . and, when the

prophet tells them what God thinks of them they, with astonishment and

impertinence, look into his face and say, "We don't see this at all!"7

 

Malachi is a prophet for our age. Certainly Christians suffer

terrible persecution in many parts of the world. But in most of

America and the Western world, the dangers are hidden. Christians

tend to accept dominant cultural values uncritically. Their commit-

ments frequently amount to little more than window dressing. Con-

temporary artist Steve Taylor puts this form of Christianity in the

mouth of his "Christian" politician who proudly declares:

 

4 R. Braun, "Malachi-A Catechism for Times of Disappointment," Currents in

Theology and Mission 4 (October 1977) 293.

5 Thus Jerome on Hab 1:1. Cited in C. F. Keil, The Twelve Minor Prophets

(2 vols.; 1868, reprinted; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1977) 2.3. All Scripture quotations

are NIV unless otherwise indicated.

6 J. Baldwin, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity,

1972) 162.

7 G. Campbell Morgan, Malachi's Message for Today (reprinted; Grand Rapids:

Baker, 1972) 30-31.



Wells: THE SUBTLE CRISES OF SECULARISM                        43

 

I'm devout, I'm sincere, and I'm proud to say,

That it's had exactly no effect on who I am today!8

 

D. R. Davies has put it more strongly. The sin of our age he

is the enthronement of Man at the centre of life, being and

thought.9 Modern culture seems (quite unconsciously) to assume that

it is within modern man's capacity to erect what is, in effect, a

Christian civilization on a basis of secular belief."10 The real tragedy,

however, is that

 

Church members are only a degree less secularized in their conscious-

ness than the public that is completely divorced from the Church.

Theoretical appreciation of belief in another world is, of course, stronger

in the Church than in the world. But it is not by any means a dynamic

disturbance in the life of the believer.11

 

The religion of Israel has ceased to be a "dynamic disturbance." The

danger is universal.

 

The Relation between Faith and Life. Second, the crisis in

Malachi involves the relation that exists between true faith and real

life. It is a crisis of relevance, that is, of the role God plays in the task

of living. Malachi indicts Judah for leaving God out of life. Their

lifestyles betray a cozy belief that what one did with God on the

Sabbath and what did Sunday through Friday had very little to do

with each other.

Christian psychologist Newton Maloney observes that this sort of

belief permeates contemporary society. He cites the influential "role"

theory of T. R. Sabin who hypothesizes that each individual moves in

five different environments, which together constitute a pattern of

roles leading to identity.12 The five environments are: (1) physical

(including the body and natural environment); (2) situational (one's

cultural life, including work, play and the like); (3) interpersonal (the

people with whom one interacts); (4) idealistic (one's goals, ambi-

tions, values and so forth); and (5) transcendental (one's experience

 

8 S. Taylor, "It's a Personal Thing" (Waco: Word Records, 1985).

9 D.R. Davies, The Sin of Our Age (New York: Macmillan, 1947) 23.

10 Ibid 12.5

11  Ibid.,61.

12 T. R. Sabin, "A Role Theory Perspective for Community Psychology: The

of Social Identity," Community Psychology and Mental Health (ed. D. Adel-

son and B. L. Kalis; Scranton: Chandler, 1970) 89-113.



44                    CRISWELL THEOLOGICAL REVIEW

 

of or with God, or the supernatural). Maloney illustrates the

this way:

 


Identity

a combination of one's status in all life roles

                     Role

           thoughts, words, feelings, and actions leading
                                      to status and satisfaction

Physical    Situational     Interpersonal    Ideal        Transcendental13

 

Maloney goes on to point out that while Sabin is right to include God

in human identity, he is wrong to make God just one more among

equals.14

Malachi would emphatically agree. God will not be one among

equals. One may live as though God were irrelevant, but God is still

relevant! Disaster follows the relegation of God to the periphery of

life. The priests may forsake the covenant of Levi, perhaps thinking

they will be more in tune with the times (2:7-8), but it explodes

before their eyes: "So I have caused you to be despised and humili-

ated before all the people"(2:9). And those who accept the pagan

view of marriage and sexuality uncritically (2:11) produce innumer-

able sorrows (2:13), destroy family life (2:15), and degrade themselves

("so guard yourself in your spirit," 2:15; 2:16).

Perhaps we may borrow again from Davies. He points to three

remarkable paradoxes that have ensued from the coronation of man:

(1) The "abolition of other-worldliness" has failed to produce a better

world here and now; (2) The "dissolution of the spirit" of man has

failed to produce a better knowledge of humanity; and (3) The

anthropocentric faith has actually resulted in "the degradation of the

human person."15 Accomodation is a subtle crisis, but a real one. In

trying to be relevant to culture, we make God irrelevant. But God will

never be irrelevant. He is eternally contemporary.

 

13 H. N. Maloney, "Introduction," Wholeness and Holiness (ed. H. N. Maloney;

Grand Rapids: Baker, 1983) 21.

14 Ibid., 25.

15 Davies, Sin, 58-123.



Wells: THE SUBTLE CRISES OF SECULARISM                        45

 

The Meaning and Value of Covenant. Third, the crisis in Mala-

chi centers on the meaning and value of covenant. The word for

"covenant" (berit) occurs six times in the prophecy (2:4; 2:5; 2:8; 2:10;

2:14; 3:1), but the idea permeates the book.16  And it has immense

homiletical significance.

It is of course well-established that various legal, contractual

agreements were known in the ancient world, and that many of the

essential features of these covenants appear in various biblical con-

texts.17 However, the biblical covenant is not merely a legal device. In

G. Quell's words, it "is a legal transaction for which there is no

analogy in the circle of experience"18 precisely because it is not,

strictly speaking, legal. It is personal and relational, as well as regula-

tive, judicial, normative, and obligatory. Quell seems to struggle put-

ting its exact character into words. He calls it "a regulated form of a

fellowship between God and man or man and God" (and, at times,

man and man as well).19 He also describes it as "a medium in man's

relation to God which is designed to promote reflection"20

These and similar definitions yield three distinctive features of

berit.  First, covenant is a personal relationship: "The Presence of

YHVH is built into the structure" of covenant.21 Second, the covenant

is a committed relationship. This explains why berit and hesed ("loyal

love