Andrews University Seminary Studies 39.2 (Autumn 2001) 191-208.

Copyright © 2001 Andrews University Press, cited with permission;

digitally prepared for use at Gordon College]

 

THE SIGNIFICANCE OF JOSHUA'S

RECEPTION OF THE LAYING ON

OF HANDS IN NUMBERS 27:12-23

 

 

KEITH MATTINGLY

Andrews, University

 

            Because Christian rites of ordination regularly involve the imposition of

hands, scholars generally recognize the importance of understanding this

practice. Instituted early in the church's development and thus in close

proximity with its Jewish origins, the imposition of hands has been thought

by scholars to stem most likely from OT roots.l Jewish exegetes and

Pentateuchal critical scholars have often adopted the view that ordination was

performed for the first time when Moses ordained Joshua with the laying on

of hands and that Joshua's installation by Moses became the prototype of

rabbinic ordination.2 It has also been proposed that Christian ordination

originally structured itself on the model of rabbinic ordination, even though

it is also understood that it took on meaning of its own.3 Thus in both Jewish

and Christian traditions, Joshua's installation has powerfully influenced

ordination practice which includes the laying on of hands.4

 

1 Jean Thierry Maertens, "Un rite de pouvoir: l'imposition des mains," Studies in

Religion 7 (1978): 29. Eduard Lohse suggests that these OT roots are authenticated by the

linguistic relationships evident between Hebrew and Greek expressions for the imposition

of hands in Die Ordination im Spatjudentum und im Neuen Testament (Gottingen:

Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 1951), 18.

2 Lohse, Die Ordination, 29. See also J. Newman, Semikhah: A Study of Its

Origin, History and Function in Rabbinic Literature (Manchester: Manchester

University Press, 1950), 2; Paul Galtier, "Imposition des mains," Dictionnaire de theologie

catholique (1927), 7:1304; H. Revel, "Ordination," Universal Jewish Encyclopedia (1939),

8:318; Everett Ferguson, "Ordination in the Ancient Church, Part 1, " Restoration Quarterly

4 (1960): 128; M. H. Shepherd Jr., "Hands, Laying on of," IDB (1962), 2:251-252; Allen

Howard Podet, "Elements in the Development of Rabbinical Ordination in the Codes"

(Ph.D. dissertation, Hebrew Union College, 1964), 50-51.

3 Johannes Behro, Die Handauflegung im Urchristentum (Leipzig: A. Deichertsche

Verlagbuchhandlung, 1911; reprint, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1968),

142; Joseph Coppens, L'imposition des mains et les rites connexes dans le Nouveau Testament

et dans l'Eglise ancienne (paris: Gabalda, 1925), 162-163; Frank Gavin, The Jewish Antecedents

of the Christian Sacraments (London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge, 1928;

reprint, New York: Ktav, 1969), 103; Lohse, Die Ordination, 101; and R. Alan Culpepper,

"The Biblical Basis for Ordination," Review and Expositor 78 (1981): 472.

4 Arnoid Ehrhardt, "Jewish and Christian Ordination," The Journal of Ecclesiastical

History 5 (1954): 138. Ehrhardt sees the,OT influence on Christian ordination to be direct,

rather than channeled through rabbinic ordination.

191



l92                  SEMINARY STUDIES 39 (AUTUMN 2001)

 

While many scholars agree that Joshua's installation has prototypical

influence on Christian ordination practice, very few agree as to the

significance of Moses' laying hands on Joshua.5 Did Moses transfer

anything to Joshua through the hand-laying gesture, and if so, what did

he transfer? Did the gesture merely designate Joshua as the one to be

ordained or, on the other hand, merely identify Moses with Joshua?

Perhaps laying on of hands indicated Joshua as in some way a substitute

or a representative of YHWH or Moses. Finally, were two hands laid on

Joshua or one, and what is the significance of the number of hands used?

In order to answer these questions, one must exegetically study the

two Pentateuchal pericopes which describe the event, Num 27:12-23 and

Deut 34:9. It is the purpose of this article to present an exegetical study of

laying on of hands as presented in Num 27:12-23. The contribution or

Deut 34:9 and final conclusions addressing the procedural techniques,

symbolic meanings, and tangible effects of the hand-laying gesture will be

presented in a subsequent article.

Num 27:12-23 plays an important role in the overall theme of the

book of Numbers. Israel had arrived on the plains of Moab and was

preparing to enter the Promised Land. The census of Num 26 established

a new generation, who was given permission to enter that land. The

necessity of new leadership to lead this new generation into the land must

be addressed, and Num 27:12-23 addresses this necessity.

An analysis of the pericope's structure provides the starting point

for an interpretation of the significance of the hand-laying gesture.

Numbers 27:12-23 contains four sections indicated by and related to

each other through external, internal, and sequential parallelism. In the

external parallelism, the last two sections repeat a pattern established by

the first two sections, designated as A, B, A', B'. Each of the A sections

presents statements made by YHWH, and each of the B sections present

Moses' responses. In the internal parallelism, each of the four sections

is further divided into four subsections, which generally follow the

pattern established by the four subsections of section A, designated as

a, b, c, d, in section B, as al, b1, c1, d1; in section A’, as a2, b2, c2, d2, and

in Section B', as a3, b3, c3, a4. Each of the "a" subsections introduces the

speaker of that section, each "b" subsection gives a request or response

to subsection "a," each of the "c" subsections addresses leadership issues,

and each of the "d" subsections addresses congregational issues. In the

sequential parallelism, each section responds to issues of the previous

 

5 For a thorough review of the various scholarly interpretations, see my dissertation,

"The Laying on of Hands on Joshua: An Exegetical Study of Numbers 27:12-23 and

Deuteronomy 34:9" (Ph.D. dissertation, Andrews University, 1997), 15-21.

 



    JOSHUA'S RECEPTION OF THE LAYING ON OF HANDS     193

section; in other words, B responds to issues raised in A, A' responds to

issues raised in B, and B' responds to issues raised in A' and may be

designated as A-B-A'-B'. The pericope parallels can be illustrated as

follows:

 

 

A YHWH Announced Moses' --      A' YHWH Instructed Moses to

    Death, vv. 12-14                                Install Joshua, vv. 18-21

    a Introductory Identifier,     --      a2 Introductory Identifier, v. 18a

       v. 12a

    b Request, v. 12b                   --     b2 Request, v. 18b

    c Leader Issues, v. 13          --    c2 Leader Issues, vv. 18c-20a

    d Congregation Issues,          --     d2 Congregation Issues,

v. 14                                                    vv. 20b-21

 

B Moses Requested YHWH to --    B' Moses Followed YHWH's

   Appoint a Leader, vv. 15-17          Instructions to Install Joshua,

vv.22-23

    al Introductory Identifier,      --  a3 Introductory Identifier, v. 22a

v.15

    bl Request, v. 16                      --   b3 Response to Request, v. 22b

    c1 Leader Issues, v. 17a,b     --  c3 Leader Issues, vv. 22c-22a

    dl Congregation Issues,

v.17c

                                                            a4 Concluding Identifier, v. 23b

 

The translation of the pericope:

 

A a and YHWH said to Moses,

b Go up into this mountain of Abarim

    and see the land which I have given to the sons of Israel.

c After you have seen it, you will be gathered to your people,

    even you, just as was gathered Aaron your brother,

d because you rebelled against my word in the wilderness

    of Zin, in the rebellion of the congregation, to sanctify

    me at the waters before their eyes. These are the Waters

    of Kadesh in the wilderness of Zin.

 

 



194                 SEMINARY STUDIES 39 (AUTUMN 2001)

 

B  a1 And Moses spoke to God, saying:

            bl Let YHWH appoint, the God of the spirits of all flesh, a man over

    the congregation,

   c1 who will go out before them and who will come in before

        them, who will lead them out and who will bring them in,

            d1 so that the congregation of YHWH will not be as sheep

     who have no shepherd.

A' a2 And YHWH said to Moses,

     b2 Take (to yourself) Joshua, son of Nun, a man in whom there is

spirit,

c2 and lay your hand on him, and stand him before Eleazar the

     priest and before all the congregation, and commission him

     before their eyes, and you shall confer some of your honor on

     him so that will listen all the congregation of the sons of Israel.

d2 He shall stand before Eleazar the priest and he shall ask for

     him by the judgment of the Urim before YHWH.

     According to His word they shall go out and according to

     His word they shall come in, he and all the sons of Israel

     with him, even all the congregation.

B' a3 And Moses did just as YHWH commanded him.

b3 and he took Joshua

     c3 and stood him before Eleazar the priest and before all the

congregation and he laid his hands on him and he

commissioned him

     a4 just as YHWH spoke by the hand of Moses.

 

This study focuses on the third section of the pericope, A', vv. 18-21.

Sections A and B provide background material to A'. Section A’ gives the

information pertinent to interpreting laying on of hands; B' concludes by

repeating step by step Moses' accomplishment of YHWH's instructions in A'.

Interpreting the significance of the laying on of hands begins by

noting the flow in the subsections of A'. The flow begins in subsection a2

(v. 18a) by identifying the speaker, YHWH. The flow continues in

subsection b2 with YHWH's request, "take to yourself" Joshua. This

imperative then initiates a series of four actions in subsection c2 that relate

to leadership issues: lay, stand, command, and give. The four actions are

tied together by four second masculine singular waw perfect verbs

indicating how Israel's next leader is to be installed. It is interesting to

note that the waw perfect construction expresses a series of actions

 

 



JOSHUA'S RECEPTION OF THE LAYING ON OF HANDS      195

 

contingent or dependent upon the preceding action and at the same time

establishes a hierarchy: first, "lay"; second, "stand"; third, "command";

and fourth, "give." Subsection c2 concludes with a "so that" clause,

indicating that the actions of the waw perfect verbs have the purpose of

giving status to Joshua--the children of Israel are to listen to him. Finally,

in subsection d2 the flow moves to congregational issues. First, Joshua was

to stand before the high priest when he needs to know the will of YHWH

for leading the congregation. Second, once Joshua received YHWH's

word, he and the congregation were free to go out and to come back.

Study will now be given to each of these four subsections.

 

Introductory Identifier--"And YHWH

Said to Moses” (Subsection a)

The Hebrew verb for "said" (rmaxA) appears about 5,300 times in the

OT, never with the purpose of describing the technique of speaking, "but

to call attention to what is being said."6 Frequently, rmaxA is used by God

to introduce revelation, in which he expresses himself and his will: "One

would suppose that this usage emphasizes that God's revelation is a

spoken, transmissible, propositional, definite matter."7 The expression

"thus says YHWH" added authority and importance to any instruction.8

When YHWH spoke, Moses listened and Moses responded.

The instructions of Num 27:18-20 are initiated by YHWH's word.

These are no ordinary instructions, but have the weight of the divine

behind them. The words which describe Joshua's installation, and which

include laying on of hands, are attributed to God himself; they are not

words invented by Moses. The pericope concludes in v. 23 by

emphasizing that all was accomplished according as YHWH spoke (rB,Di),

by the hand of Moses.

 

The Imperative--"Take Joshua, a Man in

  Whom There is Spirit” (Subsection b)

This simple command provides a wealth of information. First, it is

parallel to the commands (v. 12) to "go up" the mountain and "see" the

Promised Land, which had the result of placing Moses in a position where

 

6 Siegfried Wagner, "rmaxA "amar," TDOT (1974), 1:328.

7 Charles L. Feinberg, "rmaxA (‘amar) say, speak, say to oneself (think), intend,

command, promise," TWOT (1980), 1:55.

8 This phrase was used in talking to Pharoah (Exod 9:13; 10:3), when announcing

YHWH's will for Israel to leave Egypt (Exod 11:4), and when Moses dealt with the rebellion

of the golden calf (Exod 32:27).

 



196                 SEMINARY STUDIES 39 (AUTUMN 2001)

 

YHWH could give a third command, "take" Joshua. Second, it is also parallel

to Moses' request in v. 16 to "appoint" a leader. YHWH responded that

Moses "take" Joshua, thus communicating to Moses that he too had a role to

play in establishing Israel's next leader. Third, the imperative "take" initiated

a process of subsequent actions, indicated by the series of waw perfect verbs

in subsection c2. Finally, Joshua, son of Nun, a man in whom there is spirit,

was the one identified as the one to be taken.

The word for "spirit" in "a man in whom there is spirit" has no article,

making it difficult to develop a simple interpretation of what spirit Joshua

possessed. "Spirit" should be linked to its parallel subsection usage in Section

B (v. 16), which identifies YHWH as the "God of the spirits of all flesh."

YHWH is thus identified as the sovereign Creator. He is the one who gives

breath or spirit; therefore, he is the one who knows what the spirit of a man

really is. Identifying Joshua as a "man in whom there is spirit" indicates that

YHWH knows who Joshua is and can guarantee Moses that Joshua possesses

the requisite spiritual qualifications and skills for leadership.9

Is this spirit Joshua possesses a reference to God's spirit, or to the fact that

Joshua was a spirited man? The answer is yes to both questions. First, Leon

Wood argues that the lack of an article attached to the word "spirit" does not

necessarily preclude a reference to the Spirit of God. He uses for support 1

Chr 12:18, where the word "spirit" lacks an article yet obviously refers to

YHWH's Spirit. Wood further argues that Moses was endowed with

YHWH's Spirit, as evidenced by the story of the seventy elders with whom

he shared some of his spirit (Num 11:16-28) and by Isaiah's reference to the

"Holy Spirit within Moses" (Isa 63:11). If Moses was endowed with the Spirit,

"one should only expect that his successor would have to be."10

 

9 Most scholars accept the interpretation of spirit (HaUr) as an endowment for leadership;

for example: Jacob Milgrom, Numbers Bemidbar, The JPS Torah Commentary (Philadelphia:

Jewish Publication Society, 5750/1990), 235; Walter Riggans, Numbers, Daily Study Bible

(Philadelphia: Westminster, 1983), 202; "Numbers," The Wycliffe Bible Commentary, ed.

Charles F. Pfeiffer (Chicago: Moody Press, 1962),147; A. Clarke, The Holy Bible Containing

the Old and New Testaments: The Old Testament (New York: Abingdon-Cokesbury, 1938),

1:707-708; Julius H. Greenstone, Numbers, with Commentary (Philadelphia: Jewish

Publication Society, 1948), 297; R. B. Allen, "Numbers" Expositor's Bible Commentary

(Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1990), 2:946; Martin Noth, Numbers, A Commentary, Old

Testament Library, trans. James Martin (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1968), 214-215; F. B.

Huey, Numbers, Bible. Study Commentary (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1981),93-94; J. L.

Mays, The Book of Leviticus, the Book o/Numbers, LBC (Richmond: John Knox, 1963), 133;

F. C. Cook and T. E. Espin, The Fourth Book of Moses Called Numbers, The Holy Bible

 

 

According to the Authorized Version, 2 vols. (London: Murray, 1877), 759; A. Noordtzij,

Numbers, Bible Student's Commentary, trans. E. van der Maas (Grand Rapids: Zondervan,

1983), 256-257; O. J. Baab, The Theology of the Old Testament (New York: Abingdon-

Cokesbury, 1949),39-42.

10 Leon J. Wood, The Holy Spirit in the Old Testament (Grand Rapids: Zondervan,

 



JOSHUA'S RECEPTION OF THE LAYING ON OF HANDS      197

 

Second, "spirit" (HaUr) can indicate internal elements of an individual.

One particular element referred to is that of ability. YHWH endowed

Bezaleel with a divine spirit of skill, ability, and knowledge so that he

could construct the Tabernacle. In Joshua's case, spirit would refer to his

endowed leadership skill. YHWH had already chosen, authenticated, and

endowed him with a divine spirit of skill, ability, knowledge, and insight

to qualify him for the work. Additionally, the word "spirit" can depict a

person's dominant disposition of mind or attitude.11 In particular, "spirit"

is used as a synonym for "courage."12 Designating Joshua as a "man in

whom there is spirit" may in part refer not only to the spy scenario, but

also to Joshua's long service to Moses as well as to the entire

congregation.13 To describe Joshua as "a man in whom there is spirit" is

to describe him as a man full of life.14 As such, YHWH declared that

Joshua has the spirit of life and courage necessary to provide the kind of

strong leadership necessary to lead Israel into the Promised Land.

To summarize, YHWH, the God of the spirits of all flesh, identified

Joshua, a man in whom there is spirit. Joshua is thus indicated as one with

an indomitable and courageous spirit. But more, as the giver of spirit,

YHWH also identifies Joshua as one to whom he had given a special

Spirit, a Spirit that has changed him and endowed him for leadership.

 

1976), 49-50. Allen (2:946) states that "spirit" can also refer to the Holy Spirit, noting that

though the word HaUr (spirit) in Num 27:18 is indefinite by spelling, it "may be regarded as

inherently defInite when used as a reference to deity"; see also Clarke, 1:707-708; Greenstone, 297.

11 Spirit describing a dominant disposition can describe the following emotions: crushed

in spirit, broken, forsaken, humble, smitten, troubled, faithful, high, cool, long-enduring,

anger, stubbornness, seat of, and excellence. Norman Henry Snaith, The Distinctive Ideas of

the Old Testament (London: Epworth Press, 1944), 146-150; William Ross Shoemaker, "The

Use of HaUr in the Old Testament, and of pneuma in the New Testament," JBL 23 (1904): 13-34;

J. B. Payne, "HaUr (ruah) wind, breath, mind, spirit," TWOT (1980), 2:836-837.

12 Joshua had displayed his courage early in his victory over the Amalekites. Caleb had

a different spirit than the ten faithless spies, meaning he had not angered YHWH by his

obstinacy and rebelliousness like the others, but had instead maintained wholehearted

commitment to YHWH, which resulted in an indomitable and positive attitude toward

invading Canaan. Though Joshua's spirit is not specifically mentioned in the discussion of

Caleb's spirit, the narrative indicates that he shared in that spirit of courageously following

YHWH wholeheartedly. Joshua built upon Caleb's spirit by making the case for invasion

even more specific and serious.

13 For example, Exod 17:8-16; 24:13-14; 32:15-20; 33:7-11; Num 11:26-30; 13:1-14:38.

Timothy R. Ashley, The Book of Numbers, NICOT, 551-552.

14 W. Vogels argues that though this translation is possible due to Ps 31:6, Joshua has

more than life; he has the spirit of YHWH ("The Spirit of Joshua and the Laying on of

Hands by Moses," in The Problem of the Hexateuch and Other Essays, trans. E W. Trueman

Dicken [New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966], 3-7).

 



198          SEMINARY STUDIES 39 (AUTUMN 2001)

 

Leadership Issues--"Lay, " "Stand," "Command," "Give,"

Congregation "Listen to" (Subsection c2)

 

To review, the flow in each of the four major sections of Num 27:12-23

first identifies the section's main character, then through an imperative either

makes a request or gives a response to the previous request, and then

introduces matters concerning leadership. In section A, YHWH clarified that

Moses as Israel's current leader would soon die. In section B, Moses indicated

the desire for a leader who had the internal fortitude necessary to lead the

congregation of Israel out and back in. In section A', YHWH responded by

instructing how Moses was to install Joshua as the next leader. The imperative

level (subsection b2)of section A' established a command (take) that was

intended to initiate a series of four actions by which Moses was to install

Joshua as a leader whom the congregation would obey. The four actions were

to lay hands on Joshua, stand (present) him before Eleazar and the

congregation, commission (charge) him, and give him some of Moses' honor.

"Lay your hand on him." The first action to be initiated by the

imperative "take" was that Moses was to lay his hand on Joshua. In order

to adequately develop the significance of the hand gesture, one must first

study all the other accompanying elements. It should be noted, however,

that laying on of hands is the first of the actions indicated by the

imperative "take," even though it was not intended that this hand gesture

be the first action Moses performed in the installation. YHWH's initial

instructions to Moses indicated that Joshua's installation take place in a

public setting, thus creating a situation in which public presentation must

precede any other action. The installation, as recorded in Num 27:22-23,

confirms this conclusion, for Moses first "stood" or presented Joshua to

the children of Israel, then "laid" hands on him. By placing hand-laying

first, even though it could not be performed first, YHWH appears to be

stating that all the other actions depend on it. Structural analysis thus

provides a preliminary conclusion. Joshua's public presentation,

commissioning, and reception of some of Moses' honor were to each

somehow find their meaning or expression in the laying on of Moses'

hands. Joshua's installation is rooted in Moses' hand-laying action.

"Stand him before Eleazar the priest and before all the congregation."

The second action to follow "taking" was that of presentation. Four

observations can be made about the imperative to stand Joshua before

priest and congregation. First, the concept of "standing before" in the OT

can have the connotation of presentation.15 Joshua's formal presentation

 

l5 R. B. Allen, "dmafA/('amad) stand, remain, endure, etc," TWOT (1980), 2:673. Jacob is

presented to Pharoah (Gen 47:7), the cleansed leper is presented to YHWH at the door of the

Tabernacle (Lev 14:11), two goats are presented before YHWH (Lev 16:7), the scapegoat is





JOSHUA'S RECEPTION OF THE LAYING ON OF HANDS          199

had the dual purpose of giving him to the congregation and doing so in a

judicial setting which established that Joshua was legally Israel's next

leader. Second, the physical gesture of standing communicated Joshua's

acceptance of his responsibilities as well as the congregation's and

YHWH's acceptance of Joshua.16 Third, the verb "stand before" indicated

a cultic17 and covenantal18 event. Fourth, the concept of standing before

the priest and "congregation" give indication that Joshua's installation

ceremony took place at the tent of meeting, the normal meeting place of

the congregation. Joshua's leadership is thus connected to the Sanctuary

and to all that it represented in maintaining contact and covenant with

YHWH. His leadership must ever espouse these important principles.

"Commission him in their presence." The third action to follow

"taking" was that of giving a commission. Moses was to "commission him

(Joshua) before their eyes" (Num 27:19).19 The verb is a piel perfect,

second masculine singular of hvc, meaning either "to command" or "to

give a charge." Numbers 27:19-22 uses both meanings, first in Moses'

commissioning of Joshua (vv. 19,23), and second in Moses' obedience of

 

presented live before YHWH (Lev 16:10), a person is to be presented to the priest (Lev 27:8),

an animal is presented to the priest (Lev 27:11), Levites are presented to Aaron for service

(Num 3:6; 8:13), a suspected adulteress is presented by the priest or her husband before

YHWH for judgment (Num 5:16, 18, 30). See Ashley, 552-553, where he lists ten of the

eleven occurrences.

16 After seventy men died as a result of looking at the ark of the covenant, the men

of Beth Shemesh asked, "Who can stand before YHWH" (1 Sam 6:20); YHWH asks,

"What shepherd will stand before me?" (Jer 49:19; 50:44) implying that the shepherds are

not acceptable to himself; YHWH also asks those who have performed all manner of evil

how they think they can "stand before" him, meaning, they are to believe they are accepted

(Jer7:10); and Esther stood before Xerxes after he Indicated acceptance of her presence

(Esth 5:1-2).

17 The OT sanctuary provided the Israelites with a refuge in which to contact YHWH,

and its services gave institutional form to maintaining the covenant between YHWH and his

people. To state that the phrase "stand before" carries cultic overtones is to say that it

represents a ritual involved in Israel's worship of and maintaining contact with YHWH. The

phrase "stand before" carried a cultic connection in at least two areas: (1) "stand before" could

indicate ministry before or service to one of higher authority or to a group, or (2) stand

before" could indicate a representational element in which one representing a group "stands

before" another and intercedes in behalf of the group. In terms of leadership, if there was no

blessing from the high priest, there would be no leader. Including Eleazar the priest in the

formalities underscored the fact that Joshua's leadership of the Israelites was to be one of

cooperation with the high priest. Joshua’s rule was not to be profane; contact with YHWH

was to hold first place in his governance.

18 Joshua's installation ceremony was public, held before the entire congregation

(hdAfe--a term with strong covenantal connections). It is the congregation with whom YHWH has

made a covenant; it is the congregation who requires a leader sensitive to this covenant.

19 KJV, "give a charge"; RSV and NIV, "commission"; NKJV, "inaugurate."

 



200                             SEMINARY STUDIES 39 (AUTUMN 2001)

 

YHWH's command (v. 22). Why would both meanings be used in so few

verses? YHWH's control and input comprise one of the more important

m